Abstract
Velasco discusses contemporary literature on Bitcoin and distinguish between technical and social research, in an effort to provide a basis for identifying native social structures within this digital assemblage. The chapter is particularly interested in digital research sprouted from the technical affordances of digital objects, yet directed towards socio-political enquiries. With this as a guidance, Velasco develops indicators and a method to map some of the entities of the Bitcoin network on a geographical canvas. The chapter presents this method in detail, and discusses what it is able to show and what are its attached limitations. Ultimately, Velasco argues that many digital methods share unavoidable constraints for social research, embedded in their own digital objects: digital grammar, framework design intentions and epistemological clauses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agre, P. (1994) Surveillance and Capture: Two Models of Privacy. The Information Society 10(2): 101–27.
Androulaki, E., Karame, G., Roeschlin, M., et al. (2013) Evaluating User Privacy in Bitcoin. In A.-R. Sadeghi (Ed.), Financial Cryptography and Data Security (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), pp. 34–51.
Baumann, A., Fabian, B. and Lischke, M. (2014) Exploring the Bitcoin Network. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (Barcelona), pp. 369–74.
Beer, D. (2012) Using Social Media Data Aggregators to Do Social Research. Sociological Research Online 17(3): 10.
Bergstra, J. and Weijland, P. (2014) Bitcoin: A Money-like Informational Commodity. Working Paper (University of Amsterdam), http://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.4778.pdf (accessed 9 January 2016).
Berry, D. (2014) Critical Theory and the Digital (London: Bloomsburry).
Biryukov, A., Khovratovich, D. and Pustogarov, I. (2014) Deanonymisation of Clients in Bitcoin P2P Network. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (New York), pp. 15–29.
Bitcoin Block Explorer – Blockchain.info (2015) https://blockchain.info (accessed 7 January 2016).
Boase, R. (2013) Cypherpunks, Bitcoin & the Myth of Satoshi Nakamoto. Cybersalon Nov 5: http://www.cybersalon.org/cypherpunk/ (accessed 10 January 2016).
Castelle, M. (2013) Relational and Non-Relational Models in the Entextualization of Bureaucracy. Computational Culture 3: http://computationalculture.net/article/relational-and-non-relational-models-in-the-entextualization-of-bureaucracy (accessed 9 January 2016).
Cawrey, D. (2013) Baidu and China Telecom Stop Accepting Bitcoin, Price Slumps Again. CoinDesk. 7 Dec: http://www.coindesk.com/baidu-stops-bitcoin-price-slumps-again (accessed 10 January 2016).
Cramer, F. (2013) What Is ‘Post-digital’? APRJA 3(1): http://www.aprja.net/?p=1318 (accessed 9 January 2016).
Cusumano, M. and Goeldi, A. (2013) New Businesses and New Business Models. In W. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 239–61.
de Jong, E., Tkacz, N. and Velasco, P. (2015) ‘Live as Friends and Count as Enemies’: On Digital Cash and the Media of Payment. In G. Lovink, N. Tkacz, and P. de Vries (Eds.), Moneylab Reader: An Intervention in Digital Economy (Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures), pp. 257–67.
FAQ – Bitcoin (2015) https://bitcoin.org/en/faq (accessed 9 January 2016).
Franco, E. (2015) Inside the Chinese Bitcoin Mine That’s Grossing $1.5M a Month. Motherboard 6 Feb: https://motherboard.vice.com/read/chinas-biggest-secret-bitcoin-mine (accessed 10 January 2016).
Gehl, R. W. (2014) Power/Freedom on the Dark Web: A Digital Ethnography of the Dark Web Social Network. New Media & Society 18(7): 1219–35.
Gerlitz, C. and Helmond, A. (2013) The Like Economy: Social Buttons and the Data-Intensive Web. New Media & Society 15(8): 1348–65.
Global Legal Research Directorate (2014) Regulation of Bitcoin in Selected Jurisdictions. Law Library of Congress: http://www.loc.gov/law/help/bitcoin-survey/?loclr=bloglaw (accessed 9 January 2016).
Graham, M., Hale, S. and Stephens, M. (2012) Featured Graphic: Digital Divide: The Geography of Internet Access. Environment and Planning A 44(5): 1009–10.
Internet Live Statistics (2015) Internet Users by Country (2014). http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users-by-country (accessed 12 January 2016).
Jack, W. and Suri, T. (2011) Mobile Money: The Economics of M-Pesa. Working Paper 16721 (National Bureau of Economic Research, USA), http://www.nber.org/papers/w16721 (accessed 10 January 2016).
Karlstrøm, H. (2014) Do Libertarians Dream of Electric Coins? The Material Embeddedness of Bitcoin. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15(1): 23–36.
Kitchin, R. (2016) Thinking Critically About and Researching Algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20(1): 14–29.
Kitchin, R. and Dodge, M. (2011) Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Kittler, F. (1995) There Is No Software. ctheory. http://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14655/5522 (accessed 12 January 2016).
Kondor, D., Pósfai, M., Csabai, I. and Vattay, G. (2014) Do the Rich Get Richer? An Empirical Analysis of the Bitcoin Transaction Network. PLoS One 9(2): e97205.
Laszka, A., Johnson, B. and Grossklags, J. (2015) When Bitcoin Mining Pools Run Dry: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Long-Term Impact of Attacks between Mining Pools. 2nd Workshop on Bitcoin Research (San Juan: Puerto Rico).
Latour, B. (2007) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Law, J. and Ruppert, E. (2013) The Social Life of Methods. Journal of Cultural Economy 6(3): 229–40.
Huang, D., Dharmdasani, H., Meiklejohn, S., et al. (2014) Botcoin: Monetizing Stolen Cycles. Paper presented at NDSS 2014 Symposium (San Diego, USA), http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~snoeren/papers/botcoin-ndss14.pdf (accessed 10 March 2016).
Litke, P. and Stewart, J. (2014) BGP Hijacking for Cryptocurrency Profit. Dell SecureWorks R7 August: https://www.secureworks.com/research/bgp-hijacking-for-cryptocurrency-profit (accessed 6 January 2016).
Lovink, G. and Zehle, S. (2005) Incommunicado Reader (Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures).
Lupton, D. (2014) Digital Sociology (London: Routledge).
Lury, C. and Wakeford, N. (2012) Introduction: A Perpetual Inventory. In C. Lury and N. Wakeford (Eds.), Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social (London: Routledge), pp. 1–25.
Mackenzie, A. and McNally, R. (2013) Living Multiples: How Large-Scale Scientific Data-Mining Pursues Identity and Differences. Theory, Culture & Society 30(4): 72–91.
Marres, N. (2012) The Redistribution of Methods: On Intervention in Digital Social Research, Broadly Conceived. The Sociological Review 60(S1): 139–65.
Marres, N. (2015) Why Map Issues? On Controversy Analysis as a Digital Method. Science, Technology & Human Values 40(5): 655–86.
Marres, N. and Weltevrede, E. (2013) Scraping the Social? Issues in Live Social Research. Journal of Cultural Economy 6(3): 313–35.
Maurer, B. (2015) How Would you Like to Pay: How Technology Is Changing the Future of Money (Durham: Duke University Press).
Maurer, B., Nelms, T. and Swartz, L. (2013) ‘When Perhaps the Real Problem Is Money Itself!’: The Practical Materiality of Bitcoin. Social Semiotics 23(2): 261–77.
Meiklejohn, S., Pomarole, M., Jordan, G., et al. (2013) A Fistful of Bitcoins: Characterizing Payments among Men with No Names. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference (New York, USA), 127–40.
Mersch, Y. (2014) Euro Banknotes – A Means of Payment Recognised Worldwide. Speech given at the Bergeldsymposium of the Deutsche Bank 19 May, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2014/html/sp140519.en.html (accessed 15 January 2016).
Rogers, R. (2009) The End of the Virtual: Digital Methods (Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press).
Ruppert, E. (2012) Category. In C. Lury and N. Wakeford (Eds.), Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social (London: Routledge), pp. 36–47.
Ruppert, E., Law, J. and Savage, M. (2013) Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices. Theory, Culture & Society 30(4): 22–46.
Scott, B. (2014) Visions of a Techno-Leviathan: The Politics of the Bitcoin Blockchain. E-International Relations 1 Jun: http://www.e-ir.info/2014/06/01/visions-of-a-techno-leviathan-the-politics-of-the-bitcoin-blockchain/ (accessed 10 January 2016).
Smyth, L. (2014) The Politics of Bitcoin. Simulacrum 7 Mar: http://simulacrum.cc/2014/03/07/the-politics-of-bitcoin (accessed 6 January 2016).
Wynn, J. R. (2009) Digital Sociology: Emergent Technologies in the Field and the Classroom. Sociological Forum 24(2): 448–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Velasco, P.R. (2016). Sketching Bitcoin: Empirical Research of Digital Affordances. In: Kubitschko, S., Kaun, A. (eds) Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40700-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40700-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40699-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40700-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)