Skip to main content

Inside Synergy Assessment: Towards the Real Value of M&As

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Synergy Value and Strategic Management

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

This chapter develops an effective synergy assessment model to support the process of synergy valuation and the success of pre-deal planning. The effectiveness of the synergy value depends from the valuation models, the valuation path and the assessment process. We highlight that the synergy assessment process and the effective use of synergy valuation models are critical points to cut the failure rate of mergers and acquisitions. We analyze the most relevant valuation models and the strategic factors affecting synergy: the type of synergy, the size of synergy, the timing of synergy and the likelihood of achievement. The effective use of synergy assessment models is critical to improve the success of mergers and acquisitions due-diligence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Accenture (2007) Strategy in action. The synergy enigma. http://www.accenture.com

  • Ahuja G, Katila A (2001) Technological acquisition and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strateg Manag J 22(3):197–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allred BB, Boal KB, Holstein WK (2005) Corporations as stepfamilies: a new metaphor for explaining the fate of merged and acquired companies. Acad Manag Exec 19(3):23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angwin D (2004) Speed in M&A integration: the first 100 days. Eur Manag J 22(4):418–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff HI (1965) Corporate strategy. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JA, Mozier P (1984) A survey of the methods used by UK investments analysts to appraise investments in ordinary shares. Account Bus Res 14(55):195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker HK, Miller TO, Ramsperger BJ (1981) An inside look at corporate mergers and acquisitions. MSU Bus Top 29(1):49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkema HG, Schijven M (2008) Toward unlocking the full potential of acquisitions. Acad Manag J 51(4):696–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker RG (1999) The role of dividends in valuation models used by analysts and fund managers. Eur Account Rev 8:195–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J, Arikan A (2001) The resource-based view: origins and implications. In: Hitt MA, Freeman E, Harrison J (eds) The Blackwell handbook of strategic management. Blackwell Business, Oxford, UK, pp 124–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekier MM, Shelton MJ (2002) Keeping your sales force after the merger. McKinsey Q 12(4):106–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Bert A, MacDonald T, Herd T (2003) Two merger integration imperatives: urgency and execution. Strateg Leadersh 31(3):42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle GC, Bowen RM, Wallace JS (1997) Does EVA® beat earnings? Evidence on associations with stock returns and firm values. J Account Econ 24(3):301–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block SB (1999) A study of financial analysts: practice and theory. Financ Anal J 55(4):86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley M, Desai A, Kim HE (1988) Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their divisions between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. J Financ Econ 21(1):3–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brealey RA, Myers SC (2003) Principles of corporate finance. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner RF (2002) Does M&A pay? A survey of evidence for the decision maker. J Appl Financ Theory Pract Educ 12(1):48–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner RF (2004) Deals from hell: M&A lessons that rise above the ashes. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Campa JM, Hernando I (2004) Shareholder value creation in European M&A. Eur Financ Manag 10:47–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capron L, Dussauge P, Mitchell W (1998) Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America 1988-1992. Strateg Manag J 19(7):631–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S (1986) Types of synergy and economic value: the impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms. Strateg Manag J 7(2):119–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S (1992) Sources of value in takeovers: synergy or restructuring-implications for target and bidder firms. Strateg Manag J 13(4):267–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo G, Conca V, Buongiorno M, Gnan L (2007) Integrating cross-border acquisitions: a process-oriented approach. Long Range Plan 40(2):202–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland T (1994) Why value value? McKinsey Q 4:97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier D, Magnan ML (2005) From accounting to “Forecounting”. Can Account Perspect 4(2):243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courteau L, Kao J, Richardson G (2001) Equity valuation employing the ideal versus ad hoc terminal value expressions. Contemp Account Res 18(4):625–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinan G, Le Roux J, Weddigen R (2004) When to walk away from a deal. Harv Bus Rev 82(4):96–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran A (2005) The value of synergy. Stern School of Business, New York, NY, SSRN 841486(2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta DK (1991) Organizational fit and acquisition performance: effects of post-acquisition integration. Strateg Manag J 12(4):281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte (2007) Strategic acquisitions amid business uncertainty. http://www.deloitte.com

  • Demirakos EG, Strong N, Walker M (2004) What valuation models do analysts use? Account Horiz 18(4):221–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devos E, Kadapakkam P, Krishnamurthy S (2009) A comparison of taxes, market power, and efficiency improvements as explanations for synergies. Rev Financ Stud 22(3):1179–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles RG, Lanes KL, Wilson TC (1999) Are you paying too much for that acquisition? Harv Bus Rev 77(4):136–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensign PC (1998) Interrelationships and horizontal strategy to achieve synergy and competitive advantage in the diversified firm. Manag Decis 36(10):657–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans FC, Bishop DM (2001) Valuation for M&A: building value in private companies. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentino R, Garzella S (2015a) Synergy pitfalls management in mergers and acquisitions. Manag Decis 53(7):1469–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentino R, Garzella S (2015b) The synergy valuation models: towards the real value of mergers and acquisitions. Int Res J Financ Econ 124:71–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis J, Olsson P, Oswald D (2000) Comparing the accuracy and explainability of dividend, free cash flow, and abnormal earnings equity value estimates. J Account Res 38(1):45–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel R, Lee CMC (1998) Accounting valuation, market expectations, and cross-sectional stock returns. J Account Econ 25(3):283–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garzella S (2006) Il governo delle sinergie. Giappichelli, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Garzella S, Fiorentino R (2014) A synergy measurement model to support the pre-deal decision making in mergers and acquisitions. Manag Decis 52(6):1194–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goold M, Campbell A (1998) Desperately seeking synergy. Harv Bus Rev 76:131–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Goold M, Campbell A (2000) Taking stock of synergy. A framework for assessing linkages between business. Long Range Plan 33:72–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta D, Gerchak Y (2002) Quantifying operational synergies in a merger/acquisition. Manag Sci 18:517–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G, Prahalad CK (1995) Competing for the future. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding D, Rovit S (2005) Mastering the merger: four critical decisions that make or break the deal. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JS, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD (1991) Synergies and post-acquisition performance: differences versus similarities in resource allocations. J Manag 17(1):173–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspeslagh PC, Jemison DB (1991) Managing acquisitions. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward MLA (2002) When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990-1995. Strateg Manag J 23(1):21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintherhuber HH (2002) Taking time to integrate temporal research. Acad Manag Rev 27(2):170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg C, Bucerius M (2006) Is speed of integration really a success factor of mergers and acquisitions? An analysis of the role of internal and external relatedness. Strateg Manage J 27(4):347–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imam S, Barker R, Clubb C (2008) The use of valuation models by UK investment analysts. Eur Account Rev 17(3):503–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiymaz H, Baker HK (2008) Short-term performance, industry effects, and motives: evidence from large M&As. Q J Financ Account 47(2):17–44

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (1999) Unlocking shareholder value: the keys to success. KPMG, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson R, Finkelstein S (1999) Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: a case survey of synergy realization. Organ Sci 10(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (2008) Synergy. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Nissim D, Thomas J (2002) Equity valuation using multiples. J Account Res 40(1):135–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin M (1987) Merger strategies and stockholder value. Strateg Manag J 8(1):39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundholm RJ, O’Keefe T (2001) Reconciling value estimates from the discounted cash flow model and the residual income model. Contemp Account Res 18(2):311–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Jerez FA (2008) Governance and merger accounting: evidence from stock price reactions to purchase versus pooling. Eur Account Rev 17(1):5–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur SS, Kenyon A (1998) Creating value. Shaping tomorrow’s business. Butterwoth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan N, Ainina MF, Kaufman D, Winger BJ (1991) Acquisition/divestiture valuation practices in major US firms. Financ Pract Educ 1(1):73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee TK, Kiymaz H, Baker K (2004) Merger motives and target valuation: a survey of evidence from CFOs. J Appl Financ 14(2):7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurnberg H (2006) The distorting effects of acquisitions and dispositions on net operating cash flow. Account Forum 30(3):209–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman SH (2001) On comparing cash flow and accrual models for use in equity valuation. Contemp Account Res 18(4):681–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman SH, Sougiannis T (1998) A comparison of dividend, cash flow and earnings approach to equity valuation. Contemp Account Res 15(3):343–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter Liebeskind J (2000) Internal capital markets: benefits, costs, and organizational arrangements. Org Sci 11(1):58–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport A (1986) Creating shareholder value: the new standard for business performance. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport A, Sirower ML (1999) Stock or cash? The trade-offs for buyers and sellers in mergers and acquisitions. Harv Bus Rev 77(6):147–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger DM, Ivancevich JM, Frank R (1987) Power executive actions for managing human resources before and after acquisition. Acad Manag Exec 1(2):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirower ML (1997) Synergy trap: how companies lose the acquisition game. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirower ML (2003) Becoming a prepared acquirer. Eur Bus Forum 16:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga B (2004) Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business tracking series. J Financ 42(2):943–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer A, Castaner X, Souder R (2013) Synergy sources, target autonomy, and integration in acquisitions. J Manag 39(3):604–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YM (2011) Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strateg Manag J 32:624–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo M, Meier D (2008) What is M&A performance? Acad Manag Perspectives 22(3):55–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garzella, S., Fiorentino, R. (2017). Inside Synergy Assessment: Towards the Real Value of M&As. In: Synergy Value and Strategic Management. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40671-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics