Abstract
Over the last three decades, two major waves of reform have established a system of governance popularly labelled the New Governance. This concept refers to one of the megatrends in industrial societies, the shift from government to governance. Generally, this shift entails a relaxation of the authority of the bureaucratic and hierarchic nation-state for the benefit of “the creation of a structure or an order which cannot be externally imposed but is the result of the interaction of a multiplicity of governing and each other influencing actors” (Stoker 1998: 17). The first wave emerged in the 1980s, when neoliberalism and rational economic theories were introduced in public service through the concept of New Public Management (NPM). The second wave of reform was largely a response to the first wave, whereby system and network theorists tried to make sense of the network society that had emerged. Both politicians and the government saw a tool in these theories for managing and steering the plurality of institutions and networks that were involved in public management following NPM (see e.g. Bevir 2010: 12). In other words, the first wave aimed at achieving efficiency, while the second wave sought improved steering. Consequently, the shift from government to governance has brought about a room for manoeuvre at the local level, i.e. bottom-up processes, that was not present earlier, at the same time as new kinds of steering processes restrict actions in ways that are difficult to interpret or predict in advance. In what ways is this new concept of governance influencing, for instance, democracy, legitimacy and efficiency? The assumption for this chapter is that New Governance and governance networks have been constructed as a consequence of changes in both the economic and political systems, and that New Governance accordingly has become the centrepiece of economic and democratic theory development. As mentioned, benefits for both democracy and economy of increased bottom-up processes are found in the academic literature, and when combined, suggest that an increased room for manoeuvre for these kinds of processes may offer both economic and democratic gains. Let us now take a look at these theories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adcock, R., Bevir, M., & Stimson, S. C. (2007). Historicizing the new institutionalism(s). In R. Adcock, M. Bevir, & S. C. Stimson (Eds.), Modern political science: Anglo-American exchanges since 1880. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1994). Living in the global. In A. Amin & N. Thrift (Eds.), Globalisation, institutions and regional development in Europe. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1995). Globalisation, institutional “thickness” and the local economy. In P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. Graham, & A. Madani-Pour (Eds.), Managing cities – The new urban context. Newcastle upon Tyne: University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Asheim, B. T. (1996). Industrial districts as “learning regions”: A con dition for prosperity? European Planning Studies, 4,4, 379-400.
Asheim, B. (2001). Learning regions as development coalitions: Partnership as governance in European workfare states? Concepts and Transformation: International Journal of Action Research and Organizational Renewal, 6, 73–101.
Asheim, B., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011a). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies Special Issue: Regional Innovation Systems: Theory, Empirics and Policy, 45(7).
Asheim, B., Moodysson, J., & Tödtling, F. (2011b). Constructing regional advantage: Towards state-of-the-art regional innovation system policies in Europe? European Planning Studies 19(7).
Becattini, G. (1990): The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In F. Pyke et al. (eds): Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operationin Italy. International Institute for labour studies, Geneva, 37-51.
Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bevir, M. (2010). Democratic governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brusco, S. (1990): The idea of the industrial district: Its genesis. In F. Pyke et al. (eds): Industrial districts and interfirm co-operation in Italy. International Institute for Labour Stu dies, Geneva, 10-19.
Camagni, R. (1991) Introduction: from the local ‘milieu’ to innovation through cooperation networks, in R. Camagni (Ed.) Innovation Mtworks: Spatial Perspectives, pp. 1-9. London: Belhaven Press.
Callahan, J., & Lasry, E. (2004). The importance of customer input in the development of very new products. R&D Management, 34(2), 107–120. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Carayannis, Elias G., David F. J. Campbell (2006), “Mode 3“: Meaning and Implications from a Knowledge Systems Perspective, 1–25, in: Elias G. Carayannis, David F. J. Campbell (eds.): Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters. A Comparative Systems Approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
Carayannis, Elias G., David F. J. Campbell (2009), “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management 46 (3/4), 201–234.
Carayannis, Elias G., David F. J. Campbell (2012), Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems. Twenty-first-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development. SpringerBriefs in Business 2012, VI, 63 p. 13 illus.
Cord, D. J. (2014). The decline and fall of Nokia. Helsinki: Schildts & Söderströms.
Crouch, C. (2011 [2005]). Post-democracy, Gius, Laterza, Rome, Swedish Edition in 2011: Postdemokrati, Bokförlaget Daidalos AB, Göteborg.
Damgaard, B., & Torfing, J. (2011). The impact of meta-governance on local governance networks: Lessons from Danish employment policy. Local Government Studies, 37, 291–316.
de Beus, J. (2011). Audience democracy: An emerging pattern in postmodern political communication. In K. Brants & K. Voltmer (Eds.), Political communication in postmodern democracy. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Etzioni-Halevy, Eva. (1993). The elite connection: Problems and Potentials of Western democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Florida, R. (1995). Toward the learning region. Futures, 27(5), 527–536.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community, and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.
Freeman, C., & Louca, F. (2001). As time goes by: From the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frenken Koen, van Oort Frank, Verburg Thijs (2007). Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth, Regional Studies, Vol. 41.5, pp. 685–697.
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (Eds.). (2003). Deepening democracy. London: Verso.
Goggin Gerard (2009). Adapting the mobile phone: The iPhone and its consumption, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 23:2, 231-244.
Johnson Björn, Lorenz Edward and Lundvall Bengt-Åke (2002). Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge? Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 11, Number 2, pp. 245–262.
Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action (Reason and the rationalization of society, Vol. 1). Cambridge: Beacon Press.
Halkier, H. (2012, November). Knowledge dynamics and policies for regional development: towards a new governance paradigm. European Planning Studies, 20(11).
Halkier, H., James, L., Dahlström, M., & Manniche, J. (2012, November). Knowledge dynamics, regions and public policy. European Planning Studies, 20(11).
Hassink, R. (1998). The paradox of interregional institutional learning. Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
Heywood Andrew (2013). Politics (fourth edition). Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan.
Hirsch. (1991). From the Fordist to the post-Fordist state. In B. Jessop, H. Kastendiek, K. Nielsen, & O. K. Pedersen (Eds.), The politics of flexibility. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Hirst, P. (1994). Associative democracy: New forms of economic and social governance. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Hirst, P. (2000). Globalisering, Demokrati og det civile samfund. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel Publishers.
Hood, C., James, O., & Scott, C. (2000). Regulation of government: Has it increased, is it increasing, should it be diminishes? Public Administration, 78, 283–304.
Hudson, R. (1999). The learning economy, the learning firm and the learning region: A sympathetic critique of the limits to learning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1), 59–72.
Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36, 680–693.
Jessop, B. (1991). The welfare state in the transition from Fordism to post-Fordism. In B. Jessop, H. Kastendiek, K. Nielsen, & K. O. Pedersen (Eds.), The politics of flexibility. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Jessop, B. (1993). Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state – Preliminary remarks on post-Fordist political economy. Studies in Political Economy, Vol. 40: Post-Fordist States and Regional Blocs.
Jessop, B. (1994). Post-Fordism and the state. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-Fordism. A reader (pp. 251–279). Oxford: Blackwell.
Jessop, B. (1997). Capitalism and its future: Remarks on regulation, government and governance. Review of International Political Economy, 4(3).
Kahila, P., Lakso, T., & Suutari, T. (2006). The role of policy and governance in European peripheral regions. Seinäjoki: Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki.
Kondriatev, N. (1926). About the question of the major cycles of the conjuncture. Planovoe Khoziaistvo, 8, 167–181.
Levi-Feur, D., & Jordana, J. (2005, March). The rise of regulatory capitalism: The global diffusion of a new order. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 598. Thousand Oaks/London: SAGE Publications.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (1996). The social dimension of the learning economy (DRUID Working Papers, No 96-1). Aalborg: Aalborg University.
Madison, J. (1787-8). Federalist 10. The Federalist Papers.
Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2006). Localized learning revisited. Growth and Change, 37(1), 1–18.
Manin, B. (2002). Den representativa demokratins principer. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. The organizational basis of politics. New York: The Free Press.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: The Free Press.
Mariussen, Å., & Virkkala, S. (2013). Learning transnational learning. London: Routledge.
Michels, Robert (2001). Political parties: a sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy, Ontario: Batoche Books.
Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Verso.
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonism. London: Verso.
Nalebuff, B., & Brandenburger, A. (1996). Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
National Institute for Working Life. (1997). Stronger partnership for learning region. Stockholm.
Nie, N. H., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J. R. (1979). The changing American voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. American Economic Review, 84(3), 359–368.
Laugesen John, Yuan Yufei (2010). What factors contributed to the success of Apple’s iPhone? Working paper, 2010 Ninth International Conference on Mobile Business / 2010 Ninth Global Mobility Roundtable.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Perez, C. (1983). Structural change and the assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social system. Futures, 15, 357–375. (1985).
Peters, G. (2010). Meta-governance and public management. In S. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. New York: Routledge.
Phillips, Kevin (1975). Mediacracy: American Parties and Politics in the Communications AgeNew York: Doubleday & Company, inc.
Pierre, J. (2000). Debating governance – Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Porter, M. (1990): The competitive advantage of nations. Macmillan, London.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and competition: New agendas for companies, governments, and institutions. In M. E. Porter (Ed.), On competition (pp. 197–287). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. (2004). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 199–220. Published by: Annual Reviews.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability (Public policy and management). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Room, G. (2005). The European challenge: Innovation, policy learning, and social cohesion in the new knowledge economy. Bristol: Policy Press.
Sandel, M. J. (1996). Democracy’s discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sørensen, Eva & Torfing, Jakob (2005) Network Governance and Post-liberal Democracy, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27 (2): 197–237.
Sørensen, Eva (2006) Metagovernance: The Changing Role of Politicians in Processes of Democratic Governance, The American Review of Public Administration 2006 36: 98-114.
Sørensen, Eva & Torfing, Jakob (2009) The Politics of Self-Governance of the Self and Others in Sørensen, Eva and Triantafillou Peter (Eds) The Politics of Self-Governance, Ashgate.
Sørensen, E. (2012). Governance networks as a frame for inter-demoi participation and deliberation. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 34(4).
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stoker, G. (1998). Public private partnerships and urban governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Partnerships in urban governance: European and American experience. London: McMillan.
Tödtling, F., Asheim, B., & Boschma, R. (2013). Knowledge sourcing, innovation and constructing advantage in regions of Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20, 161. Sage Publications.
Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62, 527–540.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nordberg, K. (2017). Revolutionising Economic and Democratic Systems. In: Revolutionizing Economic and Democratic Systems. Palgrave Studies in Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Growth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40633-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40633-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40632-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40633-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)