Skip to main content

Performance of NCMRWF Model TC Track Forecasts During 2013

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tropical Cyclone Activity over the North Indian Ocean

Abstract

There are two tropical cyclone (TC) seasons over the North Indian Ocean (NIO), (including the Bay of Bengal (BOB) and the Arabian Sea (AS)), i.e. during the pre-monsoon months (April–early June) and the post-monsoon months (October–December) (Mohanty et al., Mar Geod 33:294–314, 2010). Further the Indian subcontinent happens to be one of the world’s highly vulnerable areas since the coastal population density is very high leading to an extensive damage to life and property. Therefore, forecasting of TC track and landfall location is critical for early warnings and mitigation of disaster. Track forecast errors over the NIO though improved significantly in recent years (Mohapatra et al., J Earth Syst Sci 122:589–601, 2013, J Earth Syst Sci 124:861–874. doi:10.1007/s12040-015-0581-x, 2015) are still high relative to those over the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. With advancements in computational power, development of better NWP models (both global and regional), the forecasting capability of meteorologists have greatly increased. Several meteorological centers like NCEP, UKMet office, ECMWF, JMA, JTWC etc give a real time forecast of TC tracks from their global NWP models (deterministic as well as Ensemble Prediction Systems (EPS)) (Hamill et al. Mon Weather Rev 139:3243–3247, 2011; Froude et al. Mon Weather Rev 135:2545–2567, 2007; Buckingham et al. Weather Forecast 25:1736–1754, 2010; Heming et al. Meteorol Appl 2:171–184, 1995; Heming and Radford Mon Weather Rev 126:1323–1331, 1998). TC track prediction from an ensemble forecasting system besides providing a track from each ensemble member also provides the strike probability (Weber Mon Weather Rev 133:1840–1852, 2005). For the TCs of NIO, Mohapatra et al. (J Earth Syst Sci 122:589–601, 2013, J Earth Syst Sci 124:861–874. doi:10.1007/s12040-015-0581-x, 2015) provided a detailed verification of the official forecast tracks and its improvements in the recent past. This study provides a detailed verification of the NCMRWF NWP model forecasts of 2013 TC cases. Some of the earlier studies (Ashrit et al. Improved track and intensity predictions using TC bogusing and regional assimilation. In: Mohanty UC, Mohapatra M, Singh OP, Bandyopadhyay BK, Rathore LS (eds) Monitoring and prediction of TCs in the Indian ocean and climate change, Springer, Dordrecht, p 246–254, 2014; Chourasia et al. Mausam 64:135–148, 2013 and Mohandas and Ashrit Nat hazard 73:213–235, 2014) focused on the NCMRWF model TC forecasts and the impact of bogusing, assimilation and cumulus parameterisation etc. The present study is focused on the real time operational forecasts provided to India Meteorological Department (IMD). During May–December 2013, there were five TCs observed in the Bay of Bengal namely: Viyaru (May10–17), Phailin (October 4–14), Helen (November 19–23), Lehar (November 19–28) and Madi (December 6–13). This report summarises the performance of the real time prediction of these TC tracks by the NCMRWF Global Forecast Systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashrit, R.G, Iyengar, G.R, Sankar, S, Ashish, A, Dube, A, Dutta, S.K, Prasad, V.S, Rajagopal, E.N. and Basu, S. (2013). Performance of Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) during Monsoon 2012. RESEARCH REPORT, NMRF/RR/1/2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashrit, R.G, Chourasia, M, Johny, C.J. and George, J.P. (2014). Improved track and intensity predictions using TC bogusing and regional assimilation. In: Monitoring and Prediction of TCs in the Indian Ocean and Climate Change, Mohanty, U.C, Mohapatra, M, Singh, O.P, Bandyopadhyay, B.K. and Rathore, L.S. (Eds.), Springer, Netherlands, pp.246–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chourasia, M, Ashrit, R.G. and George, J.P. (2013). Impact of TC bogusing and regional assimilation on TC track and intensity predictions. Mausam, 64, 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, C, Marchok, T.P, Ginis, I, Rothstein, L. and Rowe, D. (2010). Short- and medium-range prediction of tropical and transitioning TC tracks within the NCEP Global Ensemble Forecasting System. Weather Forecasting, 25, 1736–1754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froude, L.S.R, Bengtsson, L. and Hodges, K.I. (2007). The Prediction of Extratropical Storm Tracks by the ECMWF and NCEP Ensemble Prediction Systems. Monthly Weather Review, 135, 2545–2567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamill, T.M, Whitaker, J.S, Kleist, D.T, Fiorino, M. and Benjamin, S.G. (2011). Predictions of 2010’s TCs using the GFS and ensemble-based data assimilation methods. Monthly Weather Review, 139, 3243–3247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heming, J.T, Chan, J.C.L. and Radford, A.M. (1995). A new scheme for the initialisation of TCs in the UK Meteorological Office global model. Meteorological Applications, 2, 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heming, J.T. and Radford, A.M. (1998). The performance of the United Kingdom Meteorological Office Global Model in Predicting the Tracks of Atlantic TCs in 1995. Monthly Weather Review, 126, 1323–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchok, T. (2002). In 25th Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, San Diego, CA, American Meteorological Society, 2002, p. 1.13, available at: http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/37628.pdf

  • Mohapatra, M, Nayak, D.P, Sharma, R.P. and Bandopadhyay, B.K. (2013). Evaluation of official TC track forecast over north Indian Ocean issued by India Meteorological Department. Journal of Earth System Science, 122, 589–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohapatra, M, Nayak, D.P, Sharma, M, Sharma, R.P. and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. (2015). Evaluation of official tropical cyclone landfall forecast issued by India Meteorological Department. Journal of Earth System Science, 124, 861–874, doi:10.1007/s12040-015-0581-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, U.C, Osuri, K.K, Routray, A, Mohapatra, M. and Pattanayak, S. (2010). Simulation of Bay of Bengal TCs with WRF Model: Impact of Initial and Boundary Conditions. Marine Geodesy, 33, 294–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohandas, S. and Ashrit, R. (2014). Sensitivity of different convective parameterization schemes on TC prediction using a mesoscale model. Natural hazards, 73, 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal, E.N, Iyengar, G.R, George, J.P, Das Gupta, M, Mohandas, S, Siddharth, R, Gupta, A, Chourasia, M, Prasad, V.S, Aditi, Sharma, K. and Ashish, A. (2012). Implementation of Unified Model based Analysis-Forecast System at NCMRWF, TECHNICAL REPORT, NMRF/TR/2/2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • RSMC, New Delhi (2014). Report on Cyclonic Disturbances over North Indian Ocean during 2013, 150–239 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, H.C. (2005). Probabilistic prediction of TCs. Part I: Position. Monthly Weather Review, 133, 1840–1852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Ashrit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Capital Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ashrit, R. et al. (2017). Performance of NCMRWF Model TC Track Forecasts During 2013. In: Mohapatra, M., Bandyopadhyay, B., Rathore, L. (eds) Tropical Cyclone Activity over the North Indian Ocean. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40576-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics