Advertisement

Implications of Vehicle Automation for Planning

  • Sivaramakrishnan SrinivasanEmail author
  • Scott Smith
  • Dimitris Milakis
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mobility book series (LNMOB)

Abstract

The substantial uncertainty associated with the capabilities and deployment time lines of automated vehicle (AV) technologies makes it difficult to consider AVs in the long range transportation planning process. At the same time, given current and anticipated resource constraints, the consideration of AV technology could be critical for developing efficient and sustainable transportation systems. This paper documents findings from a workshop of modelers, planners, and researchers on (1) potential uncertainties associates with AV technology and adoption, (2) its implications for the transportation planning process, and (3) possible approaches (including immediate steps) that can help address planning under uncertainty. The workshop was held in the context of the Automated Vehicle Symposium 2015.

Keywords

Long range transportation planning Uncertainties Scenario planning Pilot projects Education 

References

  1. 1.
    Misener J (2015) Implications of vehicle automation for planning, presentation at the breakout session on planning, automated vehicles symposium, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    SAE International (2014) Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE International, Warrendale, PA. http://www.sae.org/misc/pdfs/automated_driving.pdf Accessed 12 Oct 2015
  3. 3.
    Mudge R (2015) Implication of vehicle automation for planning—policy links, presentation at the breakout session on planning, automated vehicles symposium, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith S (2015) User issues, automated vehicles symposium, breakout session on planning, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith S (2015) User issues, presentation at the breakout session on planning, automated vehicles symposium, Ann Arbor Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahmoud M, Liu Y, Hartmann H, Stewart S, Wagener T, Semmens D, Stewart R, Gupta H, Dominguez D, Dominguez F, Hulse D, Letcher R, Rashleigh B, Smith C, Street R, Ticehurst J, Twery M, van Delden H, Waldick R, White D, Winter L (2009) A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making. Environ Model Softw 24(7):798–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Milakis D, Snelder M, van Arem B, van Wee B, Correia G (2016) Scenarios about development and implications of automated vehicles in the Netherlands. In: Transportation Research board 95th annual meeting. Washington DC, TRB, 2016Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stead D, Banister D (2003) Transport policy scenario-building. Transportation Planning and Technology 26(6):513–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Childress S, Nichols B, Coe S (2015) Using an activity-based model to explore possible impacts of automated vehicles. In: Transportation research board 94th annual meeting, Washington DC, TRB, 2015Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sivaramakrishnan Srinivasan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Scott Smith
    • 2
  • Dimitris Milakis
    • 3
  1. 1.University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Volpe National Transportation Systems CenterU.S. Department of TransportationCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Transport & PlanningDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations