Abstract
Contemporary mainstream economics has been a prime factor in the degradation of the public governing capacity in the United States and other western democracies. The marketization of American government, in particular, is the chief reason for its declining ability to reliably deliver goods and services. Market advocates, exploiting neoclassical economic theory, have transformed public goods production in imitation of a market model. This has led to the evisceration of public services and the dismantling of traditions of responsible public administration. The ravaging of government has proceeded largely unhindered because we have no adequate economic theory to explain the public non-market economy, no intellectual infrastructure to explain how its purposes and processes differ crucially from those of the market, and no effective conceptual model that demonstrates why such differences matter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
With respect, for example, to the assault on British public universities, Simon Head (2011) has described how the siege of the public sphere is part of an “American zeitgeist” of corporatization: “The theories and practices that are driving this assault are mostly American in origin, conceived in American business schools,” and transplanted elsewhere, he writes, by way of management consulting firms.
- 2.
“Corruption” is also blamed. But that is not my topic. Moreover, corruption is simply another term for private interests replacing the public interest. Cf. Teachout (2014).
- 3.
Recently, several new public administration theories have offered alternative prescriptions. As I shall discuss in Chap. 3, these have neither engaged with the fundamental problem of a flawed economic model, nor have they been put into general practice.
- 4.
In the fields of workforce training, adult education, economic development and employee ownership.
- 5.
The rise of rational choice theory after World War II has been a major factor in the devaluing of government and its de-legitimization as an economic actor, as I discuss in Chap. 6.
- 6.
For more on the vast array of government’s accomplishments and successful economic production, see Lind (2012) Land of Promise, and see Hacker and Pierson (2016) American Amnesia on how the collective memory of those accomplishments has been erased.
- 7.
Galbraith’s estimate of “over half” includes health care, higher education, housing, Social Security, and “nonmilitary public expenditures at the federal, state and local levels,” of which a large part is public K-12 education.
- 8.
McGarity offers a cogent and extensive argument for an “idea infrastructure ” meaning new visions and concepts to support the restoration of “robust institutions” of governmental protection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 June A. Sekera
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sekera, J.A. (2016). “Government Is Broken”: The Collapse of the Public Governing Capacity. In: The Public Economy in Crisis. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40487-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40487-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40486-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40487-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)