Abstract
Conducting research in the field of development and social change entails working with communities, disadvantaged individuals and grassroots groups. This chapter takes such communities as skilled learners, and offers a ready-to-use community engagement checklist for research that is mindful of power relations. It explores five challenges, namely sharing, translation, relevance, accountability and power (STRAP), presented in the form of practical ‘questions’ that researchers should consider when doing fieldwork. The STRAP approach has the ability to create meaningful connections between researchers and the research subjects, while embedding the research into the process of social change itself. The chapter is illustrated with examples from our fieldwork with community Internet projects and radio stations across the world, and rural communities and grassroots women’s groups in Bosnia-Herzegovina.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Bibliography
Adler, P., Peter Adler, and Burke E. Rochford Jr. 1986. The politics of participation in field research. Urban Life 14(4): 363–377.
American Political Science Association (APSA). 2012. A guide to professional ethics in political science. 2nd edn. Revised 2012. http://www.apsanet.org/portals/54/Files/Publications/APSAEthicsGuide2012.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2012.
Benford, R.D. 1991. Framing Activity, Meaning, and Social Movement Participation: The Nuclear Disarmament Movement. Ann Arbor: UMI.
Boyer, E.L. 1996. The Scholarship of Engagement. Journal of Public Service & Outreach 1: 11–20.
Carragee, Kevin M., and Lawrence R. Frey. 2016. Communication activism research: Engaged communication scholarship for social justice. International Journal of Communication 10: 3975–3999.
Chesters, G. 2012. Social Movements and the Ethics of Knowledge Production. Social Movement Studies 11: 145–160.
Cox, L., and C. Forminaya. 2009. Movement Knowledge: What Do We Know, How Do We Create Knowledge and What Do We Do with It? Interface: A Journal For and About Social Movements 1: 1–20.
Croteau, D., W. Hoynes, and C. Ryan, eds. 2005. Rhyming Hope and History: Activists, Academics, and Social Movement Scholarship. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
della Porta, D. 2014. Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, 1 edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Denzin, N.K., and Y.S. Lincoln. 2005. Introduction. The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, eds. N.K. Denzin, and Y.S. Lincoln. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dewey, J. 1927. The Public and Its Problems. Denver, CO: Swallow Press/Ohio University Press.
Diamond, L. 2010. Liberation Technology. Journal of Democracy 3: 69–83.
Enghel, F. 2015. Towards a Political Economy of Communication in Development? Nordicom Review 36: 11–24.
Flacks, R. 2005. The Questions of Relevance in Social Movement Studies. In Rhyming Hope and History: Activists, Academics, and Social Movement Scholarship, eds. D. Croteau, W. Hoynes, and C. Ryan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Freire, P. 1994. Foreword. In Participatory communication for social change, ed. S. White, J. Ascroft, and S. Nair, 12–14. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Freire, P. 2012. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York and London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Gamson, W.A. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Hine, C. 2005. Virtual Methods and the Sociology of Cyber-Social-Scientific Knowledge. In Virtual Methods. Issues in Social Research on the Internet, ed. C. Hine. Oxford and New York: Berg.
Hintz, A., and S. Milan. 2010. Social science is police science. Researching grassroots activism. International Journal of Communication 4: 837–344.
Kivits, J. 2005. Online interviewing and the research relationship. In Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the internet, ed. Christine Hine, 35–50. Oxford: Berg.
Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kvale, S., and S. Brinkmann. 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Los Angeles and London: Sage.
Lewis, A.G. 2012. Ethics, activism and the anti-colonial: Social movement research as resistance. Social Movement Studies 11(2): 227–240.
Malthaner, S. 2014. Fieldwork in the Context of Violent Conflict and Authoritarian Regimes. In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, ed. D. della Porta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matos, S. 2013. Designing Food Cultures: Propagating the Consumption of Seaweed in the Azores Islands Through Recipes. Iridescent, Icograda Journal of Design Research 2: 24–33.
Melucci, A. 1992. Frontier Land. Collective Action Between Actors and Systems. In Studying Collective Action, eds. M. Diani, and R. Eyerman. London: Sage.
——— 1996. Challenging Codes. Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Milan, S. 2010. Towards an Epistemology of Engaged Research. International Journal of Communication 4: 856–858.
——— 2013. Social Movements and Their Technologies: Wiring Social Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Moravcsik, A. 2014. Transparency: The Revolution in Qualitative Research. PS: Political Science & Politics 47: 48–53.
Ryan, C., and K. Jeffreys. 2008. The Practice of Collaborative Theorizing, Unpublished manuscript.
Ryan, C., V. Salas-Wright, M. Anastario, and G. Camara. 2010. Making Research Matter… Matter to Whom? International Journal of Communication 4: 845–855.
Snow, D.A., R. Benford, and L. Anderson. 1986. Fieldwork Roles and Informational Yield: A Comparison of Alternative Settings and Roles. Urban Life 14: 377–408.
Stoecker, R. 2005. Research Methods for Community Change. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Underwood, e.d., and L.R. Frey. 2008. Communication and Community: Clarifying the Connection Across the Communication Community. In Communication Yearbook, vol 31, ed. C.S. Beck. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
World Bank, World Congress on Communication for Development. 2007. Lessons, Challenges, and the Way Forward, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Milan, C., Milan, S. (2016). Involving Communities as Skilled Learners: The STRAP Framework. In: Wildermuth, N., Ngomba, T. (eds) Methodological Reflections on Researching Communication and Social Change. Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40466-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40466-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40465-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40466-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)