Abstract
The basic premise of the subjective theory of value for followership has already been stated: F will not act upon a R cue from L unless F sees R to be his own subjective preferred choice over perceived alternatives for time t. The corollary of this is that leadership is a form of exchange . This is because follower F will only comply with Leader L’s R cue instigation if he sees it as the preferable alternative. He exchanges it for the alternative of not complying. On the other hand, to L the R cue is a means to engage F. L chooses this over alternatives, such as attempting to engage F in another action. Moreover, from a perspective of action over time , F’s engagement in R has implications for further compliance in the future. This is not the least in an open society where L faces competition with the instigations of others. Hence, the sacrifice of future alternatives may be perceived as well.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
WRAP is an acronym for “Widen your options”, “Reality-test your assumptions”, “Attain distance before deciding”, “Prepare to be wrong” (Heath and Heath 2013, p. 23).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tonsberg, T.A., Henderson, J.S. (2016). The Subjective Theory of Value and Following. In: Understanding Leadership in Complex Systems. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40445-5_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40445-5_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40444-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40445-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)