Modelling Information Flow and Situational Awareness in Wild Fire Response Operations

  • Laila GoubranEmail author
  • Avi Parush
  • Anthony Whitehead
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9735)


Wild fire management is often an intense and highly dynamic context, which requires the continuous flow of large amounts of information. It requires effective preparedness, quick response, and efficient and effective team communication and situational awareness. Aside from the skills and experience of the management team, the success of the process often depends on effective tools and technology that can present, communicate, and document the fire information in a way that supports and facilitates the response process. The aim of this study was to assess the informational needs of the wild fire response process and model the information flow and situational awareness, with and without supporting technology. It aimed to translate the findings to definitions and requirements for enhancing the process through human-computer interaction (HCI) design solutions and improved usability.


Situational awareness Emergency response User-centered design Wildfire response Process analysis Design requirements 



Many thanks to all team members from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; their time and valuable and continuous feedback greatly assisted the full development of the study.


  1. 1.
    Chen, R., Sharman, R., Rao, H.R., Upadhyaya, S.J.: Coordination in emergency response management. Commun. ACM 51(5), 66–73 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    MacEachren, A.M., Jaiswal, A., Robinson, A.C., Pezanowski, S., Savelyev, A., Mitra, P., Zhang, X., Blanford, J.: SensePlace2: GeoTwitter analytics support for situational awareness. In: 2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), pp. 181–190, October 2011Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hueston, E.: Fire Update Support Engine (FUSE): Visual Integration of Information within the Complex Environment of Emergency Response. Carleton University, Ottawa (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neill, B.O.: A Model Assessment Tool for the Incident Command System: A Case Study of The San Antonio Fire Department. Texas State University, San Marcos (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salas, E., Burke, C., Samman, S.: Understanding command and control teams operating in complex environments. Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag. 2, 311–323 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brandigampola, S.R.: Team Situation Awareness Displays: An Empirical Evaluation of Team Performance. Carleton University, Ottawa (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37(1), 32–64 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurapati, S., Kolfschoten, G.: A theoretical framework for shared situational awareness in sociotechnical systems. In: 2nd Workshop on Situational Awareness for Logistic Multimodal Operations, pp. 47–53 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andre, A.D., Cutler, H.A.: Displaying uncertainty in advanced navigation systems. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 31–35 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Furuta, K., Shu, Y.: Team Situation Awareness and Its Assessment. Advancement on Operation and Maintenance for Nuclear Power Plant, no. 1–2, November 2004Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Macredie, R.D., Sandom, C.: Analysing situated interaction hazards: an activity-based awareness approach. Cogn. Technol. Work 5(3), 218–228 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Endsley, M., Jones, D.: Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design (2011) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wallace, J., Ha, V., Ziola, R., Inkpen, K.: Swordfish: user tailored workspaces in multi-display environments. In: CHI 06, Montreal (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Röcker, C., Magerkurth, C.: Privacy and interruptions in team awareness systems. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations