Skip to main content

Human Right to Water in a Bottled Water Regime

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Human Right to Water

Abstract

The bottled water industry is a strong manifestation of privatization of water as a resource, which is often promoted by protagonists as a means to improve “accessibility” to “safe” water for all at “affordable” prices. However, for antagonists, the sole aim of the bottled water industry is to earn profit out of a generally minimally priced resource, even at the cost of human health and well-being. This chapter aims to examine the implications of bottled water for realization of the human right to water, arguing that it fails to meet most of the criteria for enjoying the right, considering the circumstances of the consumers of bottled water as well as the residents of the areas from where bottled water is mined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mega right stands here as a key to other rights in the same sense in which Yehezkel Dror has used the term “mega policy” (1971).

  2. 2.

    Social interests are claims or demands or desires involved in social life in civilized society and asserted in title of that life (see Pound 1943).

  3. 3.

    Salmond defines “rights” as legal interests (Salmond 2013 [1910]).

  4. 4.

    As this right is to be read in Article 21 of the Constitution which has a normative character.

  5. 5.

    “[T]he right of property in water is usufructuary, and consists not so much of the fluid itself as the advantage of its use.” Capital Water Co. v. Public Utilities Comm’n, 262 P. 863, 870 (Idaho 1926).

  6. 6.

    1 US<Footnote ID=”Fn6”><Para ID=”Par38”>1 US$ = Rs. 55 (approx.).</Para></Footnote>#x2009;= Rs. 55 (approx.).

  7. 7.

    For details, see http://www.nrdc.org/Water/Drinking/bw/exesum.asp

  8. 8.

    μg/L is micrograms per liter.

  9. 9.

    The study suggested that “In Bisleri, pesticide concentration levels was 79 times higher than the stipulated limits. Kinley had concentration levels 14.6 times above the maximum permissible amounts. Aquaplus, favored by the Indian Railways, topped the dubious list, crossing the limit by 104 times.”

References

  • Bailey, K., Chilton, J., Dahi, E., Lennon, M., Jackson, P., & Fawell, J. (2006). Fluoride in drinking water. London: WHO/IWA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, M., & Clarke, T. (2005). Blue gold: The fight to stop the corporate theft of the world’s water. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. (1992). The commons, property, and common-property regimes. In D. Bromley (Ed.), Making the commons work (pp. 3–16). San Francisco: Institute for Self-Governance Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caponera, D. (1992). Principles of water law and administration. Rotterdam: Balkema Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Science and Environment (CSE). (2004). Poison vs nutrition: A briefing paper on pesticide contamination and food safety. New Delhi: CSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR. (2002). General comment no. 15 (2002): The right to water. Geneva: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T. (2007). Inside the bottle: An exposé of the bottled water industry. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, Y. (1971). Design for the policy sciences, and ventures in policy sciences. New York: American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evandri, M. G., Tucci, P., & Bolle, P. (2000). Toxicological evaluation of commercial mineral water bottled in polyethylene terephthalate: A cytogenetic approach with Allium cepa. Food Additives & Contaminants, 17(12), 1037–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, C. (2001). Bottled water: A social phenomenon. AMBIO, 30(2), 118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1977). Community action on water pollution. Human Ecology, 5(4), 329–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzler, J. (2004). A history of water rights at common law. London: Oxford University Press. 396 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, H. (2000). The changing water paradigm a look at twenty-first century water resources development. Water International, 25(1), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, P. H. (2006). Bottled water: An unpdate. In: The world’s water. Biennial report on freshwater resources 2006–2007 (pp. 169–174). Island Press: Pacific Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattam, J. (2001). Who owns water? Sierra, September 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, M. (1977). The transformation of American law, 1780–1860. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hukka, J., & Katko, T. (2003). Water privatization revisited – Panacea or Pancake? (IRC Occasional Paper Series No. 33). Delft: IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report (Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Geneva: IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, V. R. K. (2005). Plachimada’s right. Frontline. 22(16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krachler, M., & Shotyk, W. (2009). Trace and ultratrace metals in bottled waters: Survey of sources worldwide and comparison with refillable metal bottles. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 1089–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickson, R., Sengupta, C., Mitra, P., Dave, S. N., Banerjee, A. K., Bhattacharya, A., Basu, S., Kakoti, N., Moorthy, N. S., Wasuja, M., Kumar, M., Mishra, D. S., Ghosh, A., Vaish, D. P., Srivastava, A. K., Tripathi, R. M., Prasad, R., Bhattacharya, S., & Deverill, P. (2007). Current knowledge on arsenic in groundwater in five states of India. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 42(12), 1707–1718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisani, D. J. (1987). Enterprise and equity: A critique of western water law in the nineteenth century. The Western Historical Quarterly, 18(1), 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postel, S. (2000). Entering an era of water scarcity: The challenges ahead. Ecological Applications, 10(4), 941–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pound, R. (1914). A feudal principle in modern law. International Journal of Ethics, 25(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pound, R. (1943). A survey of social interests. Harvard Law Review, 57(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pound, R. (1959). Jurisprudence. New Jeresy/St. Paul: West Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. (1998). Mill on liberty. London: Routledge. 241 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmond, J. W. (2013). Jurisprudence or the theory of the law. Book on Demand Ltd. (originally published in 1910).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2002). Water wars: Privatization, pollution and profit. London: Pluto Press. 156 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susheela, A. K. (2001). Fluorosis: Early detection and management. In Touch, 3, 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully, S. (2000). Water, water everywhere. Fortune, 141(10), 342–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. webpage: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/. Accessed on 24 Nov 2011.

  • UN Habitat. (2003). Changing perspectives and roles in urban water and sanitation provision: Privatization and beyond in water and sanitation in the world’s cities. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2010, July 28). General assembly Adopts resolution recognizing access to clean water, sanitation as human right. Department of Public Information, News and Media Division, United Nations. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2010/ga10967.doc.htm. Accessed 14 Feb 2013.

  • WMO. (1992). International conference on Water and development: The Dublin Statement, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi Shankar Shukla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shukla, R.S., Singh, N. (2016). Human Right to Water in a Bottled Water Regime. In: Singh, N. (eds) The Human Right to Water. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40286-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40286-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40285-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40286-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics