Abstract
The human right to water is ultimately to be enjoyed by people as right-holders – men, women, and children – who live in local communities. Action for implementing the right for the people is undertaken by the agencies as duty-bearers. However, neither do the duty-bearers implement the actions in an impersonal and neutral manner, nor do the right-holders passively accept these actions and their outcomes as they come. The actors on both sides are influenced by factors located within their local contexts, the interactions of which at the interface lead to dynamic results. This chapter aims to present these realities at the lowest level of action as a practical framework of norm-triads which can be used to assess the situation in any community-level context and design improvements to promote realization of the right.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This has been done through adoption of General Comment No. 15 (CESCR 2002).
- 2.
A social group is dominant when it preponderates numerically over the others and when it also wields preponderant economic and political power. Besides, higher position in the local social hierarchy, access to Western education, and external occupation also support the phenomenon of dominance (modified from Srinivas 1959).
References
CESCR. (2002). General comment no. 15 (2002): The right to water. Geneva: UN.
Cowan, J. K., Dembour, M., & Wilson, R. A. (2001). Culture and rights: Anthropological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DWCD. (2001). National policy on empowerment of women. New Delhi: Department of Women & Child Development, Government of India.
FIAN. (2004). Investigating some alleged violations of the human right to water in India (Report of the International Fact Finding Mission to India), Heidelberg: FIAN International.
Hydén, H. (2002). Normvetenskap (norm-science), Lund studies in sociology of law. Lund: Lund University.
Hydén, H. (2008). Putting law in context – Some remarks for the implementation of law in China. In H. Hydén, & P. Wickenberg (Eds.), Contributions in sociology of law: Remarks from a Swedish Horizon (Lund series in sociology of law 29, pp. 147–176). Lund, Sweden.
IMIS Reporting. (2013). Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Government of India. http://indiawater.gov.in/imisreports/NRDWPSubMain.aspx?Rep=1&t=C. Accessed 7 Jan 2013.
Long, N. (1999). The multiple optic of interface analysis (UNESCO background paper on interface analysis). Wageningen: Wageningen University.
Long, N. (1992). From paradigm lost to paradigm regained? The case for an actor-oriented sociology of development’. In N. Long & A. Long (Eds.), Battlefields of knowledge. The Interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development. London/New York: Routledge.
MWR. (1987). National water policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India.
MWR. (2002). National water policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India.
Nyamu, C. (2000). How should human rights and development respond to cultural legitimization of gender hierarchy in developing countries? Harvard International Law Journal, 41, 381–418.
Nyamu-Musembi, C. (2002). Towards an actor-oriented perspective on human rights (IDS Working Paper 169). Sussex: Institute of Development Studies.
Planning Commission. (1980). Accessibility of the poor to the rural water supply. New Delhi: Programme Evaluation Organization, Planning Commission, Government of India.
RGNDWM. (2010). National Rural Drinking Water Program (NRDWP) guidelines. New Delhi: Rajiv Gandhi National Drinking Water Mission, Ministry of Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation, Government of India.
Singh, N., Bhattacharya, P., Jacks, G., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2006). Modern domestic water supply systems: Need for a holistic perspective. Water Resources Management, 18, 237–248.
Singh, N. (2006a). Women, society and water technologies: Lessons for bureaucracy. Gender, Technology and Development, 10(3), 341–360.
Singh, N. (2006b). Indigenous Water Management Systems: Interpreting symbolic dimensions in common property resource regimes’. Society and Natural Resources, 19(4), 357–366.
Srinivas, M. N. (1959). The dominant caste in Rampura. American Anthropologist, 61, 1–16.
UN. (2010). General assembly adopts resolution recognizing access to clean water, sanitation as human right. Department of Public Information, News and Media Division, United Nations. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2010/ga10967.doc.htm. Accessed 14 Jan 2013.
WHO/UNICEF. (2012). Progress on drinking water and sanitation, 2012 update. New York: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singh, N. (2016). Realizing the Human Right to Water in Local Communities: An Actor-Oriented Analysis. In: Singh, N. (eds) The Human Right to Water. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40286-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40286-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40285-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40286-4
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)