Advertisement

Exploring Risk-Benefit Factors of Electronic Clinical Pathways Regarding Nursing Communication

  • Tadashi KanehiraEmail author
  • Taro Sugihara
  • Muneou Suzuki
  • Akio Gofuku
  • Kenji Araki
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9745)

Abstract

This study explores the influence of electronic clinical pathways (ECPs) on nurses’ daily activities, especially nursing communication, in a university hospital. Although an electronic clinical pathway enables medical-treatment processes to be standardized by interacting with different occupations, few studies have been conducted from the managerial perspective. We interviewed a doctor in the Department of Medical Information Systems and eight nurses who make entries and use ECPs. The results of the interview indicated that some nurses learned about the medical processes using electronic clinical pathways. The results also showed that the assessment abilities for patient care could decline, if the nurses failed to incorporate the electronic clinical pathways into their daily routines.

Keywords

Electronic clinical pathways communication standardization risks in nursing practice university hospital risk/benefit factors 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Our research was partly supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (21330089, 24330118, 26502008, 15K16168) of the JSPS. We would like to thank the doctor and nurses of Miyazaki University Hospital for their cooperation.

References

  1. 1.
    Every, N.R., Kopecky, S.: Critical pathways: A review. Circulation 101(4), 461–465 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zehr, K.J., Dawdon, P.B., Yang, S.C., Heitmiller, R.F.: Standardized clinical care pathways for major thoracic cases reduce hospital costs. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 66(3), 914–919 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soejima, H.: Iryō Kiroku Ga Kawaru Ketteiban Kurinikaru Pasu (in Japanese). Tōkyō: Igaku Shoin (2004). PrintGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Renholm, M., Leino-Kilpi, H., Suominen, T.: Critical pathways: A systematic review. J. Nurs. Adm. 32(4), 196–202 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Campbell, H., Hotchkiss, R., Baradshaw, N., Porteous, M.: Integrated care pathways. BMJ Br. Med. J. 316(7125), 133 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vanhaecht, K., Bollmann, M., Bower, K., Gallagher, C., Gardini, A., Guezo, J., Van Zelm, R.: Prevalence and use of clinical pathways in 23 countries—An international survey by the European Pathway Association. J. Integr. Pathways 10(1), 28–34 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cabitza, F., Simone, C., Sarini, M.: Knowledge artifacts as bridges between theory and practice: The clinical pathway case. In: Ackerman, M., Dieng-Kuntz, R., Simone, C., Wulf, V. (eds.) Knowledge Management in Action. IFIP, vol. 270, pp. 37–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Luc, K.: Care pathways: An evaluation of their effectiveness. J. Adv. Nurs. 32(2), 485–496 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coffey, R.J., Richards, J.S., Remmert, C.S., LeRoy, S.S., Schoville, R.R., Baldwin, P.J.: An introduction to critical paths. Qual. Manage. Healthc. 14(1), 46–55 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balatsoukas, P., Williams, R., Davies, C., Ainsworth, J., Buchan, I.: User interface requirements for web-based integrated care pathways: evidence from the evaluation of an online care pathway investigation tool. J. Med. Syst. 39(11), 1–15 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wakamiya, S., Yamauchi, K.: What are the standard functions of electronic clinical pathways? Int. J. Med. Inform. 78(8), 543–550 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Luc, K., Todd, J.: E-pathways: Computers and the Patient’s Journey Through Care. Radcliffe Publishing, Abingdon (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gooch, P., Roudsari, A.: Computerization of workflows, guidelines, and care pathways: A review of implementation challenges for process-oriented health information systems. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 18(6), 738 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patel, V.L., Kushniruk, A.W., Yang, S., Yale, J.F.: Impact of a computer-based patient record system on data collection, knowledge organization, and reasoning. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 7(6), 569–585 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hyde, E., Murphy, B.: Computerized clinical pathways (care plans): Piloting a strategy to enhance quality patient care. Clin. Nurse Spec. 26(5), 277–282 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang, H., Li, W., Liu, K., Zhang, J.: Knowledge-based clinical pathway for medical quality improvement. Inf. Syst. Front. 14(1), 105–117 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sugihara, T., Sakanishi, H., Gofuku, A., Umemoto, K., Suzuki, M., Araki, K.: Potential of electronic clinical pathways as triggers for eliciting implicit knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON2015), pp. 410–415 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leonard, M., Graham, S., Bonacum, D.: The human factor: The critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual. Saf. Health Care. 13(suppl 1), i85–i90 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Japan Council for Quality Health Care.: “iryou ziko joho syu-syu- tou zigyou hiyarihatto 2009–2015”, 7 June 2016. http://www.med-safe.jp/mpsearch/SearchReport.action
  20. 20.
    Kinoshita, Y.: Raibu Kōgi M-GTA: Jissenteki Shitsuteki Kenkyūhō: Shūseiban Guraundeddo Seorī Apurōchi No Subete. Tōkyō: Kōbundō (2007). PrintGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kinoshita, Y.: Guraundeddo Seorī Apurōchi No Jissen: Shitsuteki Kenkyū Eno Sasoi. Tōkyō: Kōbundō (2003). PrintGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tadashi Kanehira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Taro Sugihara
    • 1
  • Muneou Suzuki
    • 2
  • Akio Gofuku
    • 1
  • Kenji Araki
    • 2
  1. 1.Okayama UniversityOkayamaJapan
  2. 2.Miyazaki UniversityMiyazakiJapan

Personalised recommendations