Advertisement

Provenance: An Archival Perspective

  • Giovanni MichettiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

Archival provenance is a complex concept, the sum of different factors that altogether trace archival records back to their creation and through their management and use. Provenance plays a major role in different archival functions, from arrangement and description to preservation. Therefore, principles and methods for capturing and representing provenance have been developed over a long time in the archival domain. However, further research in this area is needed to cope with the challenges and opportunities of new technology—on the one hand, the digital environment has made it extremely easy to mix and re-use digital objects, to a point that it is often difficult to trace provenance; on the other hand, tools like Resource Description Framework (RDF) can be used to represent provenance through new standards and models.

Keywords

Arrangement and description Digital preservation InterPARES Original order Principle of provenance Provenance RDF Trust 

References

  1. 1.
    International Council on Archives: ISDF. International Standard for Describing Functions. First Edition. Developed by the Committee on Best Practices and Standards. Dresden, Germany, 2–4 May 2007. International Council on Archives, Paris (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Instructions pour la mise en ordre et le classement des archives départementales et communales. Paris, 24 avril 1841. In: Lois, Instructions et Règlements Relatifs aux Archives Départementales, Communales et Hospitalières, pp. 16--28. H. Champion, Libraire, Paris (1884)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Muller, S., Feith, J.A., Fruin, R.: Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives, 2nd edn., trans. A.H. Leavitt. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nesmith, T.: Principle of provenance. In: Duranti, L., Franks, P. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Archival Science, pp. 284–288. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nesmith, T.: Still fuzzy, but more accurate: some thoughts on the “Ghosts” of archival theory. Archivaria 47, 136–150 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cook, T.: Macroappraisal in theory and practice: origins, characteristics, and implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Arch. Sci. 5, 101–161 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacNeil, H.: Trusting description: authenticity, accountability, and archival description standards. J. Arch. Organ. 7, 89–107 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Wide Web Consortium: PROV-O: The PROV Ontology. W3C Recommendation 30 April 2013, http://www.w3.org/TR/2013?REC-prov-o-20130430/
  9. 9.
    Duchein, M.: Theoretical principles and practical problems of Respect des Fonds in archival science. Archivaria 16, 64–82 (1983)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bastian, J.A.: Reading colonial records through an archival lens: the provenance of place, space, and creation. Arch. Sci. 6, 267–284 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horsman, P.: Taming the elephant: an orthodox approach to the principle of provenance. In: Abukhanfusa, K., Sydbeck, J. (eds.) The Principle of Provenance: Report from the First Stockholm Conference on the Archival Principle of Provenance, 2–3 September 1993, pp. 51--63. Swedish National Archives, Stockholm (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations