Skip to main content

Twitter User Clustering Based on Their Preferences and the Louvain Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends in Practical Applications of Scalable Multi-Agent Systems, the PAAMS Collection (PAAMS 2016)

Abstract

In this paper, a novel agent-based platform for Twitter user clustering is proposed. We describe how our system tracks the activity for a given topic in the social network and how to detect communities of users with similar political preferences by means of the Louvain Modularity. The quality of this clustering method is evaluated against a subset of human-labeled user profiles. Finally, we propose combining community detection with a force-directed graph algorithm to produce a visual representation of the political communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008(10), P10008 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bostock, M., Ogievetsky, V., Heer, J.: D3 data-driven documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17(12), 2301–2309 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Klusch, M. (ed.): Intelligent information agents: agent-based information discovery and management on the Internet. Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, B.: Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies 5(1), 1–167 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 415–444 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, K.P., Druschel, P., Bhattacharjee, B.: Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pp. 29–42. ACM, October 2007

    Google Scholar 

  7. Newman, M.E.: Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(23), 8577–8582 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen, D., Demeester, T., Trieschnigg, D., Hiemstra, D.: Federated search in the wild: the combined power of over a hundred search engines. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1874–1878. ACM, October 2012

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pfalzner, S., Gibbon, P: Many-Body Tree Methods in Physics. Cambridge University Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schrenk, M.: Webbots, Spiders, and Screen Scrapers: A Guide to Developing Internet Agents with PHP/CURL. No Starch Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stefanidis, A., Crooks, A., Radzikowski, J.: Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds. GeoJournal 78(2), 319–338 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tapscott, D.: Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World HC. McGraw-Hill (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Westerman, D., Spence, P.R., Van Der Heide, B.: Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(2), 171–183 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanchez Martin, A.J., de la Prieta Pintado, F., De Gasperis, G.:Fixing and evaluating texts: mixed text reconstruction method for data fusion environments. In: 2014 17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), pp. 1–6. IEEE, July 2014

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando De la Prieta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sánchez, D.L., Revuelta, J., De la Prieta, F., Gil-González, A.B., Dang, C. (2016). Twitter User Clustering Based on Their Preferences and the Louvain Algorithm. In: de la Prieta, F., et al. Trends in Practical Applications of Scalable Multi-Agent Systems, the PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 473. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40159-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40159-1_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40158-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40159-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics