Skip to main content

An Ontologically Innovative Design of CSR Strategies: Enabling Value Added Institutional Collaborations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter introduces an ontological design of a corporate social responsibility (CSR) framework. Enterprise ontology contributes to CSR conceptualisation enabling institutional collaborations and arbitrage. In a post-financial crisis era where corporate budgets are limited, there is an increasing interest from organisational stakeholders to focus on the practical aspect of managerial applications of CSR. The specific objectives of this chapter are firstly, to design a framework entailing long-term critical success factors (CSFs) necessary for a sustainable CSR design, secondly, to identify key performance indicators (KPIs) necessary for the implementation of a CSR strategy and finally, to realise internal and external socio-economic and political forces of the indicated stakeholders that shape the CSR policies and collaborations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Barjis, J. (2011). Enterprise process modelling complemented with business rules. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management, 5(4), 276–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (2012). Treatise on basic philosophy: Ethics: The good and the right (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, T., Stinchfield, B. T., & Wood, M. S. (2011). A triptych inquiry: Rethinking sustainability, innovation, and financial performance (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. 11-026/2/DSF 9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, T. H. (2014). The role of institutional arbitrage in the search for product innovation: Firm level evidence from Norway. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 392–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., & Laura, J. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context. In A. Crane, D. Matten, & J. L. Spence (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context (2nd ed., pp. 3–20). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz J. L. G., & Hoogervorst, J. A. P. (2008). Enterprise ontology in enterprise engineering. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on applied computing, pp. 572–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. L. G., Hoogervorst, J. A. P., Albani, A., Aveiro, D., Babkin, E., Barjis, J., Caetano, A., et al. (2013). The discipline of enterprise engineering. International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering, 3(1), 86–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovinco, S. W. (2007). Image reputation management: What it is, and why you should care. Retrieved March 10, 2016, from Medium.com.Medium

    Google Scholar 

  • Girth, A. M. (2014). A closer look at contract accountability: Exploring the determinants of sanctions for unsatisfactory contract performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 317–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. (2004). How CSR contribute to the competitiveness of Europe in a more sustainable world. Netherlands: The World Bank Institute and The CSR Resource Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2008). Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 540–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusyk, S. M., & Lozano, J. M. (2007). SME social performance: A four-cell typology of key drivers and barriers on social issues and their implications for stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(4), 502–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, P. E. D., Mistry, D., & Davis, P. R. (2010). Price competitive alliance projects: Identification of success factors for public clients. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136, 947–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, S. P., Fontrodona, J., & Hernandez, J. (2010). Towards a sustainable innovation model for small enterprises. In C. Louche, S. O. Idowu, & W. L. Filho (Eds.), Innovative CSR: From risk management to value creation (pp. 305–330). Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marc, O., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organisational Studies, 24, 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. A., & Anderson, M. H. (2006). A general dynamic capability: Does it propagate business social competencies in the retail food industry? Journal of Management Studies, 43, 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Ann Arbor, 1001, 48109–41234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. (2005). CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society. Harverd Business Review, 84(12), 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 56–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., Habisch, A., & Schmidpeter, R. (Eds.). (2004). Responsibility and social capital: The world of small and medium sized enterprises. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., Schmidpeter, R., & Habisch, A. (2003). Assessing social capital: Small and medium sized enterprises in the UK and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business-society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Story, V., O’Malley, L., & Hart, S. (2011). Roles, role performance and radical innovation competences. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 952–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Papagiannis, F.A. (2017). An Ontologically Innovative Design of CSR Strategies: Enabling Value Added Institutional Collaborations. In: Theofilou, A., Grigore, G., Stancu, A. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility in the Post-Financial Crisis Era. Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40096-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics