Skip to main content

A New Paradigm: How Social Movements Shape Corporate Social Responsibility After the Financial Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Social Responsibility in the Post-Financial Crisis Era
  • 1599 Accesses

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) looks at the different dimensions of the relationship between the business and the society. Most of the current theories and points of view are, in our view, part of a paradigm of economic thinking established by the Chicago School of Economics represented by Milton Friedman who, since 1970, decreed that the only aim of business is to make profit (Friedman, M. ([1970]2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In W. Zimmerli, K. Richter, & M. Holzinger (Eds.), Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173–179). Berlin: Springer). New social movements, amplified by the financial crisis from 2007, like Occupy from the USA, Indignados from Spain or Uniti Salvam! from Romania shape a new paradigm to define CSR, inspired by the social and political texts of Noam Chomsky (Chomsky, N. (2010). Hopes and prospects. London: Penguin Books; Chomsky, N. (2011). Occupy the future. Retrieved April 23, 2016, from https://chomsky.info/20111101/; Chomsky, N. (2012). Noi cream viitorul. Ocupatii, interventii, imperialism, rezistenta. Bucharest: Corint). As part of this new Chomsky paradigm, the responsibility of the business must be oriented toward the whole society. In our view, this is a new paradigm, not a new theory, because the premises on which it is built are contradictory and mutually exclusive to the premises of the old Friedman paradigm. The question of the authors is if, after the financial crisis and in the context of the social movements which are becoming political movements too, we will see a paradigmatic conviction or conversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “The big question is how to get some of the wealthiest individuals and biggest corporations to pay anything like their fair share” (Corbyn 2015).

References

  • Berthoin-Antal, A., & Sobczak’s, A. (2014). Culturally embedded organizational learning for global responsibility. Business & Society, 53(5), 652–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, M. M. ([1995]2004). Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. In T. Clarke (Ed.), Theories of corporate governance: The theoretical foundations (pp. 174–189). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, B., & Wiggin, A. (2009). The new empire of debt. The rise of an epic financial crisis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortun, D., & Crisan, C. (2012). Levels of corporate community engagement. Who should provide the social license to operate. The Romanian Economic Journal, 15(46bis), 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutilier, R. G., & Thomson, I. (2011). Modelling and measuring the social license to operate: Fruits of a dialogue between theory and practice. Retrieved September 1, 2012, from http://socialicense.com/publications/Modelling%20and%20Measuring%20the%20SLO.pdf

  • Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate social performance as a bottom line for consumers. Business and Society, 38, 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2006). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management (6th ed.). Mason: Thompson/South Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Retrieved April 22, 2016, from http://library.uniteddiversity.coop/More_Books_and_Reports/Silent_Spring-Rachel_Carson-1962.pdf

  • Chittum, R., Schilis-Gallego, C., & Carvajal, R. (2016). Global banks team with law firms to help the wealthy hide assets. Leaked records show that hundreds of banks and their subsidiaries and branches registered nearly 15,600 shell companies. Retrieved April 16, 2016, from https://panamapapers.icij.org/20160404-banks-lawyers-hide-assets.html

  • Chomsky, N. (2010). Hopes and prospects. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2011). Occupy the future. Retrieved April 23, 2016, from https://chomsky.info/20111101/

  • Chomsky, N. (2012). Noi cream viitorul. Ocupatii, interventii, imperialism, rezistenta. Bucharest: Corint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T. ([1998]2004). The stakeholder corporation: A business philosophy for the information age In T. Clarke (Ed.), Theories of corporate governance: The theoretical foundations (pp. 189–203). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbyn, J. (2015). The economy in 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2016, from https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/jeremyforlabour/pages/70/attachments/original/1437556345/TheEconomyIn2020_JeremyCorbyn-220715.pdf?1437556345

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crisan, C. (2013). Corporatiile si societatea. Responsabilitatea sociala corporativa intre act voluntar si obligatie. Bucharest: Tritonic.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, F. J., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2009). The role of governance in corporate social responsibility: Lessons From dutch finance. Business & Society, 52(2), 282–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. (2008). Just another emperor. The myths and realities of philanthrocapitalism. Demos: A Network for Ideas & Action, The Young Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (2007). Enter the triple bottom line. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line, does it all add up? (pp. 1–17). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, G. H. (1976). Achieving corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 1(1), 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. (2006). Corporation, be good! the story of corporate social responsibility. Indianapolis: Dog Ear Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. R., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, relation and success. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. ([1962]2002). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. ([1970]2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In W. Zimmerli, K. Richter, & M. Holzinger (Eds.), Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173–179). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1980). Free to choose. A personal statement. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanivich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gond, J. P., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate social performance disoriented: Saving the lost paradigm? Business & Society, 49(4), 677–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P., Lovins, A., & Lovins, H. (1999). Natural capitalism. Creating the next industrial revolution. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. (2001). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. Wellington: New Zealand Business Roundtable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. ([1988]2002). Manufacturing consent. The political economy of mass media. New-York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, M. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility and International Development: Is Business the Solution? New York: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. (1985). The imperative of responsibility. In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. ([1962]2008). Structura revoluţiilor stiinţifice. Bucharest: Humanitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle. Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, J., K. Meehan and A. Richards. (2006) Corporate social responsibility: the 3C-SR model International Journal of Social Economics, 33 (5/6), 386-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, N. (1986). Corporate power, legitimacy, and social policy. The Western Political Quarterly, 39(2), 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porritt, J. (2007). Capitalism as if the world matters. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation. Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L. E. (2001). Consensus statement on stakeholder model of the corporation. Retrieved December 14, 2008, from http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/~stake/Consensus.htm

  • Ray, P., & Anderson, S. R. (2000). The cultural creatives. New York: Harmony Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (2007). Supercapitalism. The transformation of business, democracy, and everyday life. New York: Alfred. A. Knopf, Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2014). Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. Retrieved April 22, 2016, from http://gabriel-zucman.eu/files/SaezZucman2014.pdf

  • Schrempf-Stirling, J., & Palazzo, G. (2016). Upstream corporate social responsibility: The evolution from contract responsibility to full producer responsibility. Business and Society, 55(4), 491–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P. (1979). A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. The Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. ([2003]2007). Enron—Pride comes before the fall. In W. Zimmerli, K. Richter, & M. Holzinger (Eds.), Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 129–137). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzek, H., Pirson, M., & Dierksmeier, C. (2012). Introduction. In H. Spitzek, M. Pirson, & C. Dierksmeier (Eds.), Banking with integrity. The winners of the financial crisis (Kindle ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, E. (1999). The stakeholder concept: A mistaken doctrine. UK: Foundation for Business Responsibilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J., & Friedland, C. (1962). What can regulators regulate-the case of electricity. JL & Econ, 5, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (2008, October 7). Comments CSR 2.0. In CSR International > Blogspot > 2008 > CSR 2.0. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http://csrinternational.blogspot.com/2008/10/csr-20.html

  • Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S. (2007). The civil corporation. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenisek, T. J. (1979). Corporate social responsibility: A conceptualization based on organizational literature. The Academy of Management Review, 4(3), 359–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crisan, C., Adi, A. (2017). A New Paradigm: How Social Movements Shape Corporate Social Responsibility After the Financial Crisis. In: Theofilou, A., Grigore, G., Stancu, A. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility in the Post-Financial Crisis Era. Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40096-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics