Abstract
The controversial practice of ‘fracking’ as practised in the USA has offered the promise of energy independence, a climate-friendlier ‘bridge’ to renewable energy than coal, and a much needed economic boost. At the same time, fracking is linked with widespread water and air pollution, increased incidence of earthquakes, split communities and drastically altered landscapes. How has the proposed introduction of fracking in the UK fared in light of these concerns? What role has science played in the battle for public opinion fought by the shale industry and its opponents? This chapter examines efforts by the shale industry to ‘win hearts and minds’, including the use of intensive public relations as well as academic funding and lobbying activities, and assesses their impact on media coverage of the controversy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
AEA. (2012). Support to the identification of potential risks for the environment and human health arising from hydrocarbons operations involving hydraulic fracturing in Europe. Retrieved March 28, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/energy/pdf/fracking%20study.pdf
Balmer, J. M. T. (2010). The BP deepwater horizon debacle and corporate brand exuberance. Journal of Brand Management, 18(2), 97–104.
Bloomberg. (2014, September 17). Fracking in Europe: Fighting the revolution. Retrieved March 29, 2016, from http://www.bloombergview.com/quicktake/fracking-europe
Bosworth, T. (2014). Unconventional and unburnable: Why going all out for shale gas is the wrong direction for the UK’s energy policy. Issues in Environmental Science and Technology: Fracking, 39, 199–221.
Cairney, P., Fischer, M., & Ingold, K. (2016). Hydraulic fracturing policy in the UK: Coalition, cooperation and opposition in the face of uncertainty. In Comparing Coalition Politics: Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing in North America and Western Europe, ed. C. Weible, T. Heikkila, K. Ingold and M. Fischer: Palgrave. Retrieved May 2015, from http://www.icpublicpolicy.org/conference/file/reponse/1435316621.pdf
Cave, T., & Rowell, A. (2014). A quiet word: Lobbying, crony capitalism and broken politics in Britain. London: The Bodley Head.
CHEM Trust. (2015). Fracking pollution: How toxic chemicals from fracking could affect wildlife and people in the UK and EU. Retrieved March 20, 2016, fromhttp://www.chemtrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/chemtrust-fracking-briefing-june2015.pdf
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA). (2014). Shale gas rural economy impacts. Retrieved March 23, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/408977/RFI6751_Draft_Shale_Gas_Rural_economy_impact_paper.pdf
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA). (2015). Draft shale gas rural economy impacts [Unredacted]. Retrieved March 23, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/440791/draft-shale-gas-rural-economy-impact-report.pdf
Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). (2015). UK energy statistics, Q2 2015. Retrieved March 23, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/463016/Press_Notice_September_2015.pdf
Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). (2016). Guidance on fracking: Developing shale oil and gas in the UK. Retrieved March 24, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/about-shale-gas-and-hydraulic-fracturing-fracking/developing-shale-oil-and-gas-in-the-uk
Department of Energy and Climate Change blog (DECC blog). (2015). Shale gas—An inconvenient truth for the anti-fracking lobby. Retrieved March 23, 2016, from https://decc.blog.gov.uk/2015/09/23/shale-gas-an-inconvenient-truth-for-the-anti-fracking-lobby/
Elkins, P. (2012, December 6). The UK’s new dash for gas is a dangerous gamble. New Scientist. Retrieved March 23, 2016, from https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22594-the-uks-new-dash-for-gas-is-a-dangerous-gamble/
Friends of the Earth. (2015, January 25). Revealed: Secret government-industry plans to circumvent fracking opposition. Retrieved March 24, 2016, from https://www.foe.co.uk/blog/revealed-secret-government-industry-plans-circumvent-fracking-opposition
Gallup. (2016, March 30). Opposition to fracking mounts in the U.S. Retrieved March 23, 2016, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/190355/opposition-fracking-mounts.aspx
Gov.uk. (2013, January 13). Local councils to receive millions in business rates from shale gas developments. Retrieved March 19, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/local-councils-to-receive-millions-in-business-rates-from-shale-gas-developments
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Russell, G., & Kharecha, P. (2013). Climate sensitivity, sea level and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(2001), 20120294. Retrieved March 20, 2016, from http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.4846
Harrison, G., Parkinson, S., & McFarlane, G. (2014). Shale gas and fracking: Examining the evidence. Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) and the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH). Retrieved March 23, 2016, from http://www.sgr.org.uk/sites/sgr.org.uk/files/SGR-CIEH-Shale-gas-bfg.pdf
IPCC. (2014). Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri, & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC. Retrieved March 19, 2016, from http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
Jackson, R., Lowry, E., Pickle, A., Kang, M., DiGiulio, D., & Zhao, K. (2015). The depths of hydraulic fracturing and accompanying water use across the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(15), 8969–8976.
Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Comfort, D. (2013). Fracking and public relations: Rehearsing the arguments and making the case. Journal of Public Affairs, 13(4), 1479–1854.
Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Comfort, D. (2015). The contested future of fracking for shale gas in the UK: Risk, reputation and regulation. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 11(4), 337–390.
KPMG. (2011). Shale gas a global perspective. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from https://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/shale-gas-global-perspective.pdf
Lander, R. (2013). Knowledge and power: Fossil fuel universities. Platform, People & Planet and 350.org. Retrieved March 26, 2016, from https://peopleandplanet.org/dl/fossil-free/knowledge-power-report.pdf
MacKay, D., & Stone, T. (2013). Potential greenhouse gas emissions associated with shale gas extraction and use. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). Retrieved March 28, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/237330/MacKay_Stone_shale_study_report_09092013.pdf
McClenaghan, M. (2015). Investigation: Top universities take £134m from fossil fuel giants despite divestment drive. Greenpeace Energy Desk. Retrieved March 14, 2016, from http://energydesk.greenpeace.org/2015/10/23/data-top-universities-take-134m-from-fossil-fuel-giants-despite-divestment-drive/
McQueen, D. (2015). CSR and new battle lines in online PR war: A case study of the energy sector. In A. Adi, D. Crowther, & G. Grigore (Eds.), Online CSR corporate social responsibility in the digital age (Developments in corporate governance and responsibility, Vol. 7, pp. 99–125). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
New York State Health Department. (2014). A public health review of high volume hydraulic fracturing for shale gas development. Retrieved March 24, 2016, from https://www.health.ny.gov/press/reports/docs/high_volume_hydraulic_fracturing.pdf
Ofcom. (2015, December 15). News consumption in the UK: Research report. Retrieved March 27, 2016, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/tv-research/news/2015/News_consumption_in_the_UK_2015_report.pdf
O’Hara, S., Humphrey, M., Andersson-Hudson, J., & Knight, W. (2015). Public perception of shale gas extraction in the UK: Two years on from the balcombe protests. University of Nottingham. Retrieved March 17, 2016, from http://bettersociety.net/images/Public%20Perceptions%20of%20shale%20gas%20in%20the%20UK%20sept131015MH.WK.JA-H.pdf
Parliament.UK. (2016). Lord Browne of madingley. Retrieved March 17, 2016, fromhttp://www.parliament.uk/biographies/lords/lord-browne-of-madingley/2172
Petersen, M., Mueller, C., Moschetti, M., Hoover, S., Llenos, A., Ellsworth, W., et al. (2016). One-year seismic hazard forecast for the central and eastern United States from induced and natural earthquakes. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved March 30, 2016, from http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2016/1035/ofr20161035.pdf
Public Health England. (2014). Potential public health impacts of exposures to chemical and radioactive pollutants as a result of the shale gas extraction process. Retrieved February 28, 2014, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332837/PHE-CRCE-009_3-7-14.pdf
Ritchie, H., Lloyd, G., & Griffiths, P. (2014). A fracking good time? A planned approach to energy resilience in the UK and Ireland. Paper presented to the Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP) Annual Congress. “From control to co-evolution”, July 9–12, University of Utrecht & University of Delft.
Spinwatch. (2015, April 29). Access all areas: Westminster's (vast) fracking lobby exposed. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from http://www.spinwatch.org/index.php/issues/climate/item/5765-access-all-areas-frackers-lobbyists-and-the-revolving-door
Task Force on Shale Gas. (2015). Final conclusions and recommendations. Retrieved February 10, 2016, from https://www.taskforceonshalegas.uk/news-and-events/final-conclusions-and-recommendations
TEDX. (2016). Chemicals in oil and gas operations—Peer-reviewed papers. TEDX The endocrine disruption exchange. Retrieved March 24, 2016, from http://www.endocrinedisruption.org/chemicals-in-natural-gas-operations/peer-reviewed-articles
The Geological Society. (2012). Shale gas and fracking. Retrieved March 23, 2016, from https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/Policy-and-Media/Resources/Shale-Gas-and-Fracking
The Royal Society and The Royal Academy of Engineering. (2012). Shale gas extraction in the UK: A review of hydraulic fracturing. Retrieved February 28, 2015, fromhttp://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/shale-gas-extraction-in-the-uk
Tuodolo, F. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: Between civil society and the oil industry in the developing world. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 8(3), 530–541. Retrieved March 25, 2016, from http://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/acme/article/view/850/706
Tyndale Centre. (2011). Shale gas: An updated assessment of environmental and climate change impacts. Retrieved March 20, 2016, from http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/sites/default/files/coop_shale_gas_report_update_v3.10.pdf
UNEP. (2012, November). Gas fracking: Can we safely squeeze the rocks? Global Environmental Alert Service (GEAS). Retrieved March 28, 2016, from http://www.unep.org/pdf/UNEP-GEAS_NOV_2012.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McQueen, D. (2017). Fear, Loathing and Shale Gas. The Introduction of Fracking to the UK: A Case Study. In: Theofilou, A., Grigore, G., Stancu, A. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility in the Post-Financial Crisis Era. Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40096-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40096-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40095-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40096-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)