Advertisement

The Different Attachment to Virtual Possession Between Young and Elder Adults

  • Chia-Sui Hsu
  • Yuan-Chi TsengEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9741)

Abstract

This research explores emotional relationship between individual among different ages and their virtual possessions. We conducted 24 in-depth interviews with younger adults (under 20-year-old) and elder adults (above 40-year-old) in Taiwan. Data were collected and analyzed following grounded theory coding method. By understanding usage behaviors and feelings about participants’ important virtual possessions, we induced several differences of virtual possession attachment among different ages. We concluded four types of virtual possession, the causes of attachment development and usage behaviors among different ages. Finally, several similarities and dissimilarities between elder and young adults were discussed. Some guidelines of designing for improving virtual possession attachment for people in these two generations are proposed.

Keywords

Attachment Virtual possession Different generation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant, MOST 104-2628-E-006 -013 -MY3, from Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

References

  1. 1.
    Bilton, N.: I Live in the Future & Here’s How It Works: Why Your World, Work, and Brain are Being Creatively Disrupted. Crown Business, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowlby, J.: Attachment and Loss, vol. 3. Basic books, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic books, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mugge, R.: Product attachment, TU Delft, Delft University of Technology (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chapman, J.: Design for (Emotional) Durability. Des. Issue 25, 29–35 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Page, T.: Product attachment and replacement: implications for sustainable design. Int. J. Sustain. Des. 2(3), 265–282 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blevis, E., Stolterman, E.: Ensoulment and sustainable interaction design. In: Proceedings of IASDR, Hongkong (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J.: Teenagers and their virtual possessions: design opportunities and issues. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kleine, S., Baker, S.M.: An integrative review of material possession attachment. Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev. 1, 1–29 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cushing, A.L.: Possessions and self extension in digital environments: Implications for maintaining personal information. The University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Belk, R.: Possessions and Self. Wiley Online Library, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borgmann, A.: Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1984)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Belk, R.: Extended self in a digital world. J. Consum. Res. 40(3), 477–500 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants. On Horiz. 9(5), 1–6 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M.: Basics of Qualitative Research, vol. 15. Sage Newbury Park, CA (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cognition, Experience and Behavior Design Lab, Department of Industrial DesignNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations