Advertisement

The Management Model Development of User Experience Design in Organization

A Case Study for Taiwan Technology Industry
  • Henry Been-Lirn Duh
  • Jim-Jiunde LeeEmail author
  • Pei Luen Patrick Rau
  • Mu Qing Chen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9741)

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a holistic user experience management model for companies to evaluate and advance their management status. The research started with qualitative interviewed with corporations in Taiwan, then we used affinity diagrams to organize interview materials, through matching interview findings with Total Quality Management (TQM), Total User Experience Management (TUXM) is constructed to apply in local corporations. To provide corporations with a more effective management tool, TUXM is further paired with Corporation UX Maturity Model to generate tactical UX management guidelines. Our model provides assessment of user experience management from three dimensions:
  1. 1.

    Include all local corporations in our model to obtain a holistic view of the corporation UX development status in Taiwan.

     
  2. 2.

    For each corporation to examine its UX resource allocation.

     
  3. 3.

    Combine international advanced UX development cases into the checklist, local corporations can realize the UX development gap when compared with international competitors in the same industry.

     

Keywords

UX management User experience design Activity theory Corporate User-Experience maturity mode TUXM 

References

  1. Marcus, A., Gunther, R., Sieffert, R.: Validating a standardized usability/user-experience maturity model: a progress report. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 104–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bainbridge, W.S.: Survey Research: A Computer-Assistant Introduction. Wadsworth, California (1989)Google Scholar
  3. Bødker, S.: Applying activity theory to video analysis: how to make sense of video data in human-computer interaction. In: Context and ConsciousnessGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowles, C., Box, J.: Undercover User Experience Design. New Riders Publishing, pp. 144–166, San Francisco (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, S., Brand, R.: Total Quality Management in Government: A Practical Guide for the Real World. Jossey-Bass Inc., Pub., California (1993)Google Scholar
  6. Ebenreuter, N., Geerts, M.: Design Strategy: towards an understanding of different methods and perspectives. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, pp. 51:1–51:8. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  7. Ishikawa, K.: Guide to Quality Control. Asian Productivity Organization, Second Revised Edition, Tokyo (1986)Google Scholar
  8. Westcott, R.T.: The Certified Manager of Quality/Organizational Excellence Handbook. ASQ, Quality Press, Wisconsin (2005)Google Scholar
  9. Stokes, D., Bergin, R.: Methodology or “methodolatry”? An evaluation of focus groups and depth interviews. In: International Conference on Economics and Finance Research IPEDR, vol. 4 (2011). Qualitative market research: An international Journal 9(1), 26–37 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. Van Tyne, S.: Corporate user-experience maturity model. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 635–639. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry Been-Lirn Duh
    • 1
  • Jim-Jiunde Lee
    • 2
    Email author
  • Pei Luen Patrick Rau
    • 3
  • Mu Qing Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Engineering and ICTUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Communication StudiesNational Chiao Tung UniversityHsinchuTaiwan, ROC
  3. 3.Department of Industrial EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations