Advertisement

Measuring Disengagement and Chaos in Multitasking Interaction with Smart Devices

  • Yubo Zhang
  • Pei-Luen Patrick RauEmail author
  • Runting Zhong
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9741)

Abstract

In this study we developed an instrument to measure disengaged and chaotic experience of multitasking interaction with multiple smart devices. An online survey was conducted in a sample of 380 valid respondents. Via exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in equal-size subsets of the collected sample, we constructed a model with five factors with an acceptable goodness-of-fit. The five factors were: Confusion (CF), Flow experience (FE), Complexity and disorientation (CD), Time distortion (TD), Situation awareness (SA). This instrument provides a method to gain insight on how people behave and feel in multitasking contexts and it is beneficial for designing and evaluating information infrastructure to support people’s multitasking behaviors.

Keywords

Ubiquitous and mobile devices Disengagement Chaos Multitasking Instrument 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by a National Natural Science Foundation China grant No. 71188001 and State Key Lab of Automobile Safety and Energy.

References

  1. 1.
    Godley: THR’s social media poll: How facebook and twitter impact the entertainment industry (2012). Accessed http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/gallery/facebook-twitter-social-media-study-302273#3
  2. 2.
    Rideout, V.J., Foehr, U.G., Roberts, D.F.: Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8-to 18-Year-Olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mark, G., Voida, S., Cardello, A.: “A pace not dictated by electrons”: an empirical study of work without email. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2012, p. 555 (2012). http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207754
  4. 4.
    Jeong, S.-H., Fishbein, M.: Predictors of multitasking with media: media factors and audience factors. Media Psychol. 10(3), 364–384 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, Z., Tchernev, J.M.: The “myth” of media multitasking: reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. J. Commun. 62(3), 493–513 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ophir, E., Nass, C., Wagner, A.D.: Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106(37), 15583–15587 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kahneman, D.: Attention and effort. Am. J. Psychol. 88 (1973). http://doi.org/10.2307/1421603
  8. 8.
    Mark, G., Gudith, D., Klocke, U.: The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 107–110. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bardhi, F., Rohm, A.J., Sultan, F.: Tuning in and tuning out: media multitasking among young consumers. J. Consum. Behav. 9(4), 316–332 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mark, G., Wang, Y., Niiya, M.: Stress and multitasking in everyday college life: an empirical study of online activity. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 41–50. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mark, G., Iqbal, S., Czerwinski, M., Johns, P.: Capturing the mood: facebook and face-to-face encounters in the workplace. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2014. ACM, Baltimore (2014a)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mark, G., Iqbal, S.T., Czerwinski, M., Johns, P.: Bored mondays and focused afternoons: the rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Toronto (2014b)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brasel, S.A., Gips, J.: Media multitasking behavior: concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Networking 14(9), 527–534 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Brien, H.L., Toms, E.G.: What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 59(6), 938–955 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Josey-Bass, San Francisco (1975)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: the psychology of optimal performance. In: Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness (1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park, J.H.: Flow in multitasking: the effects of motivation, artifact, and task factors. University of Texas at Austin (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Agarwal, R., Karahanna, E.: Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Q. 24(4), 665–694 (2000). http://doi.org/10.2307/3250951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xie, B., Salvendy, G.: Review and reappraisal of modelling and predicting mental workload in single-and multi-task environments. Work Stress 14(1), 74–99 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leroy, S.: Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 109(2), 168–181 (2009). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.04.002 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dabbish, L., Mark, G., González, V.M.: Why do I keep interrupting myself?: environment, habit and self-interruption. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3127–3130. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jackson, S.A., Eklund, R.C., Martin, A.J.: The Flow Manual. Mind Garden Inc., California (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ahuja, J.S., Webster, J.: Perceived disorientation: an examination of a new measure to assess web design effectiveness. Interact. Comput. 14(1), 15–29 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C.: Multivariate Data Analyses with Readings. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith, B., Caputi, P., Rawstorne, P.: The development of a measure of subjective computer experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23(1), 127–145 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stiggelbout, A.M., Molewijk, A.C., Otten, W., Timmermans, D.R.M., Van Bockel, J.H., Kievit, J.: Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients’ and physicians’ views. J. Med. Ethics 30(3), 268–274 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lattin, J.M., Carroll, J.D., Green, P.E.: Analyzing Multivariate Data. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hu, L., Bentler, P.M.: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. Multi. J. 6(1), 1–55 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rau, P.-L.P., Peng, S.-Y., Yang, C.-C.: Time distortion for expert and novice online game players. CyberPsychology Behav. 9(4), 396–403 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yubo Zhang
    • 1
  • Pei-Luen Patrick Rau
    • 1
    Email author
  • Runting Zhong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations