Advertisement

Role of Counseling in Fetal Congenital Heart Diseases

  • Maria Giovanna RussoEmail author
  • Fiorella Fratta
  • Beniamino Tormettino
  • Nicola Colacurci
Chapter

Abstract

Counseling is a profession that helps individual, family, or group through the relationship between the professional and client. Counseling facilitates the processes of change and improves the quality of life, enhancing both the resources and the relationships with the environment surrounding. The fetal echocardiography is a technique born in the late 1980s, when the improvement of ultrasound technology has made it possible to highlight the characteristics of the fetal heart. Huhta JC, one of the fathers of this method, wondered immediately if, without the possibility of dealing with in utero congenital heart disease, it was useful or advisable to diagnose before birth. Numerous studies have now clearly demonstrated that a team consisting of a gynaecologist and a cardiologist pediatrician can diagnose with very high accuracy a number of congenital heart defects in the fetal stage; so, the spectrum of the anomalies discovered in the uterus is almost superimposed on the heart disease observed at birth. Nowadays, high attention to the anatomy of the fetal heart is associated with an equally close attention to the psychological aspect of the matter: in practice it is not always possible to deal adequately with the counseling prospective parents.

Keywords

Congenital Heart Disease Fetal Heart Congenital Heart Defect Hypoplastic Leave Heart Syndrome Placental Abruption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Caniano A, Baylis F. Ethical considerations in prenatal surgical consultation. Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15:303–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flake AW. Prenatal intervention: ethical considerations for life-threatening and non-life threatening anomalies. Seminars Pediatr Surg. 2001;10:212–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aite L, Trucchi A, Nahom A, Zaccara A, La Sala E, Bagolan P. Antenatal diagnosis of surgically correctable anomalies: effects of repeated consultations on parental anxiety. J Perinatol. 2003;23(8):652–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Di Giusto M, Lazzari R, Giorgetti T, Paesano R, Pachi A. Psychological aspects of therapeutic abortion after early prenatal diagnosis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1991;18:169–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lorenz R, Kuhn M. Multidisciplinary team counselling for fetal anomalies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:263–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dallaire L, Lortie G, Des Rochers M, Clermont R, Vachon C. Parental reaction and adaptability to the prenatal diagnosis of fetal defect or genetic disease leading to pregnancy interruption. Prenat Diagn. 1995;15:249–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gotzmann L, Schonholzer S, Kolbe N, et al. Suspected fetal malformation in ultrasound examination: effects on the psychological well-being of pregnant women. Ultraschall Med. 2002;81:33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hunfield J, Agterberg G, Wladimiroff JW, Passchier J. Quality of life and anxiety in pregnancy after late pregnancy loss: a case–control study. Prenat Diagn. 1996;16:783–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gewillig M. The Fontan circulation. Heart. 2005;91:839–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rychik J, Szwast A, Natarajan S, et al. Perinatal and early surgical outcome for the fetus with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a 5-year single institutional experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;36:465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allan LD. Development of congenital lesions in mid or late gestation. Int J Cardiol. 1988;19:361e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yagel S, Weissman A, Rotstein Z, et al. Congenital heart defects: natural course and in utero development. Circulation. 1997;96:550e5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arzt W, Tulzer G. Fetal surgery for cardiac lesions. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:695e8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Golombeck K, Ball RH, Lee H, et al. Maternal morbidity after maternal-fetal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:834–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oepkes D, Moon-Grady AJ, Wilkins-Haug L, et al. 2010 Report from the ISPD Special Interest Group fetal therapy: fetal cardiac interventions. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:249–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gardiner HM, Kumar S. Fetal cardiac interventions. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;48:956–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McElhinney DB, Tworetzky W, Lock JE. Current status of fetal cardiac intervention. Circulation. 2010;121:1256–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mizrahi-Arnaud A, Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Marshall AC. Pathophysiology, management, and outcomes of fetal hemodynamic instability during prenatal cardiac intervention. Pediatr Res. 2007;62:325–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fouron JC. The changing and complex relationship between paediatric cardiologists and life. Cardiol Young. 2000;10:551–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Giovanna Russo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fiorella Fratta
    • 1
  • Beniamino Tormettino
    • 2
  • Nicola Colacurci
    • 2
  1. 1.Pediatric Cardiology UnitSecond University of Studies of Naples – Monaldi HospitalNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Woman, Child and of General and Specialized SurgerySecond University of Studies of NaplesNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations