Advertisement

Concepts of Voice and Feminism

  • Briony Lipton
  • Elizabeth Mackinlay
Chapter
  • 495 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education book series (GED)

Abstract

Concepts of voice and feminism and feelings of agency are in many ways connected to our multiple subjectivities as women and as feminists. In this chapter we explore the paradoxical concepts of voice and feminism, and focus on what speech acts do, whom they include and exclude, whose voices are valorised and whose are silenced. We critically interrogate notions of silencing and silence in relation to women’s voices, agency, and empowerment. In doing so it is possible to reconceptualise silence as a potential strategy for negotiating gender relations.

Keywords

Feminist Theory Gender Equity Feminist Identity Selection Committee Academic Woman 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2014). Willful subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cixous, H. (1976). The laugh of the Medusa. Signs, 1(4), 875–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cixous, H. (1997). Sorties: out and out: attacks/ways out/forays. In A. D. Schrift (Ed.), The logic of the gift: Toward and ethic of generosity. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, J. (2008). Living with/in and without neo-liberalism. Focaal-European Journal of Anthropology, 51, 135–147.Google Scholar
  5. Crowder, D. G. (1983). Amazons and mothers? Monique Wittig, Hélène Cixous and theories of women’s writing, Contemporary Literature, 24 (2), 117–144.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, B. (1991). The concept of agency: A feminist poststructrualist analysis. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, 30, 42–53.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, B. (1992). Women’s subjectivity investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. S. Smith, Trans. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  10. Franzway, S., Sharp, S., Mills, R., & Gill, J. (2009). Engineering ignorance: The problem of gender equity in engineering. Frontiers, 30(1), 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gal, S. (1991). Between speech and silence: The problematics of research on language and gender. In M. di Leonardo, ed., Gender at the crossroads of knowledge: Feminist anthropology in the postmodern era. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gatens, M. (1996). Imaginary bodies: Ethics, power and corporeality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Gay, R. (2014). Bad feminist: Essays. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  14. Gill, R. (2010). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of the Neoliberal University. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Leathwood, C. (2004). Doing difference in different times: Theory, politics, and women-only spaces in education. Women’s Studies International Forum, 27, 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lipton, B. (2016). Writing through the labyrinth: Using lectriture feminine in leadership studies. Leadership. doi: 10.1177/1742715015619969
  17. Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg, NY: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mahoney, M. A. (1996). The problem of silence in feminist psychology. Feminist Studies, 22 (3), 603–625.Google Scholar
  19. McGill, L. (2013). The silencing of women. In F. Jenkins & K. Hutchison (Eds.), Women in philosophy: What needs to change? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mewburn, I. (2013). Academic assholes and the circle of niceness. (https://thesiswhisperer.com/2013/02/13/academic-assholes/).
  21. Olsen, T. (2003). Silences. New York, NY: CUNY Press.Google Scholar
  22. Oseen, C. (1997). Luce Irigaray, sexual difference and theorising leaders and leadership. Gender, Work and Organization, 4(3), 170–184.Google Scholar
  23. Parapart, J. L. (2010). Choosing silence: Rethinking voice, agency and women’s empowerment. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Parsons, E., & Prioloa, V. (2013). Agents for change and changed agents: The micro-politics of change and feminism in the academy. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(5), 580–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Phillips, M. (2014). Re-writing corporate environmentalism: Ecofeminism, corporeality and the language of feeling. Gender, Work and Organization, 21(5), 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rozmarin, M. (2011). Creating oneself: Agency, desire and feminist transformations. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  27. Solnit, R. (2014). Men explain things to me. London: Granata Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Thornton, M. (2013). The mirage of merit: Reconstituting the “Ideal Academic”. Australian Feminist Studies, 28(76), 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tuana, N. (2004). Coming to understand: Orgasm and the epistemology of ignorance. Hypatia, 19(1), 195–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tuana, N. (2006). The speculum of ignorance: The women’s health movement and epistemologies of ignorance. Hypatia, 21(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
  31. White, J., & Drew, S. (2011). Collecting data or creating meaning? Qualitative Research Journal, 11(1), 3–12.Google Scholar
  32. Wise, S. (1997). What are feminist academics for? In L. Stanley (Ed.), Knowing feminisms. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Wrenn, M. V. (2015). Agency and neoliberalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(5), 1231–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Briony Lipton
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Mackinlay
    • 2
  1. 1.School of SociologyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations