Advertisement

Resin Infiltration: A Microinvasive Treatment for Carious and Hypomineralised Enamel Lesions

  • Leandro A. HilgertEmail author
  • Soraya C. Leal
Chapter

Abstract

The rationale for using resin infiltration is based on the success achieved in obliterating the diffusion pathways of demineralised enamel with a low-viscosity resin. After treating enamel surface with an acid, and rinsing and drying, this resin is infiltrated into the lesion’s porous enamel, filling the voids and arresting carious lesion progression. This microinvasive technique is indicated for treating non-cavitated proximal lesions in both primary and permanent teeth. Also, resin infiltration may be used aesthetically to improve the appearance of white-spot lesions and other hypomineralised lesions in anterior teeth, since successfully infiltrated lesions clinically look similar to sound enamel. This chapter discusses the principles of the resin infiltration technique on the basis of the available scientific evidence and presents clinical applications of this treatment option.

Keywords

Caries infiltration Infiltrant Enamel carious lesion White-spot lesion Microinvasive treatment 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Kidd EA, Fejerskov O. What constitutes dental caries? Histopathology of carious enamel and dentin related to the action of cariogenic biofilms. J Dent Res. 2004;83 Spec No C:C35–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim S, Kim EY, Jeong TS, Kim JW. The evaluation of resin infiltration for masking labial enamel white spot lesions. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011;21(4):241–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Masking of labial enamel white spot lesions by resin infiltration – a clinical report. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(9):713–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C, Borges AB, Torres LM, Gomes IS, de Oliveira RS. Effect of caries infiltration technique and fluoride therapy on the colour masking of white spot lesions. J Dent. 2011;39(3):202–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Featherstone JD. Dental caries: a dynamic disease process. Aust Dent J. 2008;53(3):286–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mattousch TJ, van der Veen MH, Zentner A. Caries lesions after orthodontic treatment followed by quantitative light-induced fluorescence: a 2-year follow-up. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29(3):294–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ogaard B. Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-year-olds: a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96(5):423–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ekstrand KR, Bakhshandeh A, Martignon S. Treatment of proximal superficial caries lesions on primary molar teeth with resin infiltration and fluoride varnish versus fluoride varnish only: efficacy after 1 year. Caries Res. 2010;44(1):41–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Improved resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res. 2008;87(12):1112–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Cölfen H, Kielbassa AM. Resin infiltration of artificial enamel caries lesions with experimental light curing resins. Dent Mater J. 2007;26(4):582–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Phark JH, Duarte S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Caries infiltration with resins: a novel treatment option for interproximal caries. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2009;30 Spec No 3:13–7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mejàre I, Källestål C, Stenlund H, Johansson H. Caries development from 11 to 22 years of age: a prospective radiographic study. Prevalence and distribution. Caries Res. 1998;32(1):10–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kugel G, Arsenault P, Papas A. Treatment modalities for caries management, including a new resin infiltration system. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2009;30 Spec No 3:1–10; quiz 1–2.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paris S, Hopfenmuller W, Meyer-Lueckel H. Resin infiltration of caries lesions: an efficacy randomized trial. J Dent Res. 2010;89(8):823–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fejerskov O, Kidd EAM. Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management. Blackwell/Munksgaard: Oxford/Ames; 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kielbassa AM, Muller J, Gernhardt CR. Closing the gap between oral hygiene and minimally invasive dentistry: a review on the resin infiltration technique of incipient (proximal) enamel lesions. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(8):663–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Walsh T, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M, et al. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(3):CD001830.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Splieth CH, Ekstrand KR, Alkilzy M, Clarkson J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Martignon S, et al. Sealants in dentistry: outcomes of the ORCA Saturday Afternoon Symposium 2007. Caries Res. 2010;44(1):3–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gomez SS, Basili CP, Emilson CG. A 2-year clinical evaluation of sealed noncavitated approximal posterior carious lesions in adolescents. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9(4):239–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martignon S, Ekstrand KR, Ellwood R. Efficacy of sealing proximal early active lesions: an 18-month clinical study evaluated by conventional and subtraction radiography. Caries Res. 2006;40(5):382–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martignon S, Ekstrand KR, Gomez J, Lara JS, Cortes A. Infiltrating/sealing proximal caries lesions: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2012;91(3):288–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Kielbassa AM. Surface layer erosion of natural caries lesions with phosphoric and hydrochloric acid gels in preparation for resin infiltration. Caries Res. 2007;41(3):223–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meyer-Lueckel H, Chatzidakis A, Naumann M, Dörfer CE, Paris S. Influence of application time on penetration of an infiltrant into natural enamel caries. J Dent. 2011;39(7):465–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Infiltration of natural caries lesions with experimental resins differing in penetration coefficients and ethanol addition. Caries Res. 2010;44(4):408–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Infiltrants inhibit progression of natural caries lesions in vitro. J Dent Res. 2010;89(11):1276–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Inhibition of caries progression by resin infiltration in situ. Caries Res. 2010;44(1):47–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Belli R, Rahiotis C, Schubert EW, Baratieri LN, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Wear and morphology of infiltrated white spot lesions. J Dent. 2011;39(5):376–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Torres CR, Rosa PC, Ferreira NS, Borges AB. Effect of caries infiltration technique and fluoride therapy on microhardness of enamel carious lesions. Oper Dent. 2012;37(4):363–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Soviero VM, Paris S, Leal SC, Azevedo RB, Meyer-Lueckel H. Ex vivo evaluation of caries infiltration after different application times in primary molars. Caries Res. 2013;47(2):110–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meyer-Lueckel H, Bitter K, Paris S. Randomized controlled clinical trial on proximal caries infiltration: three-year follow-up. Caries Res. 2012;46(6):544–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Paris S, Bitter K, Naumann M, Dörfer CE, Meyer-Lueckel H. Resin infiltration of proximal caries lesions differing in ICDAS codes. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119(2):182–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A, Danielsen B, Nyvad B. Reliability of visual examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bite-wing radiography, and reproducibility of direct visual examination following tooth separation for the identification of cavitated carious lesions in contacting approximal surfaces. Caries Res. 1998;32(3):204–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pitts NB, Rimmer PA. An in vivo comparison of radiographic and directly assessed clinical caries status of posterior approximal surfaces in primary and permanent teeth. Caries Res. 1992;26(2):146–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Thylstrup A, Bille J, Qvist V. Radiographic and observed tissue changes in approximal carious lesions at the time of operative treatment. Caries Res. 1986;20(1):75–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schwendicke F, Meyer-Lueckel H, Stolpe M, Dörfer CE, Paris S. Costs and effectiveness of treatment alternatives for proximal caries lesions. PLoS One. 2014;9(1), e86992.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Øgaard B. White spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: mechanisms and fluoride preventive aspects. Semin Orthod. 2008;14(3):183–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Heymann GC, Grauer D. A contemporary review of white spot lesions in orthodontics. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(2):85–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Benbachir N, Ardu S, Krejci I. Indications and limits of the microabrasion technique. Quintessence Int. 2007;38(10):811–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Murphy TC, Willmot DR, Rodd HD. Management of postorthodontic demineralized white lesions with microabrasion: a quantitative assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131(1):27–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Knösel M, Eckstein A, Helms HJ. Durability of esthetic improvement following Icon resin infiltration of multibracket-induced white spot lesions compared with no therapy over 6 months: a single-center, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144(1):86–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Eckstein A, Helms HJ, Knösel M. Camouflage effects following resin infiltration of postorthodontic white-spot lesions in vivo: one-year follow-up. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(3):374–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Muñoz MA, Arana-Gordillo LA, Gomes GM, Gomes OM, Bombarda NH, Reis A, et al. Alternative esthetic management of fluorosis and hypoplasia stains: blending effect obtained with resin infiltration techniques. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(1):32–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Operative DentistryUniversity of BrasiliaBrasíliaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric DentistryUniversity of BrasiliaBrasiliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations