Skip to main content

Learning for Search Results Diversification in Twitter

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9659))

Abstract

Diversifying the results retieved is an effective approach to tackling users’ information needs in Twitter, which typically described by query phrase are often ambiguous and have more than one interpretation. Due to tweets being often very short and lacking in reliable grammatical sytle, it reduces the effectiveness of traditional IR and NLP techniques. However, Twitter, as a social media, also presents interesting opportunies for this task (for example the author information such as the number of statuses). In this paper, we firstly address diversitication of the search results in Twitter with a learning method and explore a series of diversity features describing the relationship between tweets which include tweet content, sub-topic of tweet and the Twitter specific social information such as hashtags. The experimental results on the Tweets2013 datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the learning approach. Additionally, the Twitter retrieval task achieves improvement by taking into account the diversity features. Finally, we find the sub-topic and Twitter specific social features can help solve the diversity task, especially the post time, hashtags of tweet and the location of author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tweets come from Tweets2013 corpus.

  2. 2.

    Tweets come from Tweets2013 corpus.

  3. 3.

    The software can be downloaded from http://mloss.org/software/view/527/.

  4. 4.

    The corpus is publicly available at http://wis.ewi.tudelft.nl/airs2013.

  5. 5.

    http://trec.nist.gov/data/web10.html.

  6. 6.

    Tweets come from Tweets2013 corpus.

  7. 7.

    Tweets come from Tweets2013 corpus.

  8. 8.

    Tweets come from Tweets2013 corpus.

References

  1. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., Tseng, B.: Why we twitter: an analysis of a microblogging community. In: Zhang, H., Spiliopoulou, M., Mobasher, B., Giles, C.L., McCallum, A., Nasraoui, O., Srivastava, J., Yen, J. (eds.) WebKDD 2007. LNCS, vol. 5439, pp. 118–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Busch, M., Gade, K., Larson, B., Lok, P., Luckenbill, S., Lin, J.: Earlybird: Real-time search at twitter. In: IEEE 28th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2012), Washington, DC, USA (Arlington, Virginia), 1–5 April 2012, pp. 1360–1369 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agrawal, R., Gollapudi, S., Halverson, A., Ieong, S.: Diversifying search results. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 5–14. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carbonell, J.G., Goldstein, J.: The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 1998, August 24–28 1998, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 335–336 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Santos, R.L.T., Macdonald, C., Ounis, I.: Exploiting query reformulations for web search result diversification. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2010, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, 26–30 April 2010, pp. 881–890 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu, Y., Lan, Y., Guo, J., Cheng, X., Niu, S.: Learning for search result diversification. In: The 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2014, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, 06–11 July 2014, pp. 293–302 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Teevan, J., Ramage, D., Morris, M.R.: #Twittersearch: a comparison of microblog search and web search. In: Proceedings of the Forth International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining, WSDM 2011, Hong Kong, China, 9–12 February 2011, pp. 35–44 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ozsoy, M.G., Onal, K.D., Altingovde, I.S.: Result diversification for tweet search. In: Benatallah, B., Bestavros, A., Manolopoulos, Y., Vakali, A., Zhang, Y. (eds.) WISE 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8787, pp. 78–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Jabeur, L.B., Tamine, L., Boughanem, M.: Uprising microblogs: a bayesian network retrieval model for tweet search. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2012, Riva, Trento, Italy, 26–30 March 2012, pp. 943–948 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, X., He, B., Luo, T., Li, B.: Query-biased learning to rank for real-time twitter search. In: 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2012, Maui, HI, USA, 29 October–02 November 2012, pp. 1915–1919 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luo, Z., Osborne, M., Petrovic, S., Wang, T.: Improving twitter retrieval by exploiting structural information. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 22–26 July 2012, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luo, Z., Osborne, M., Wang, T.: Opinion retrieval in twitter. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Dublin, Ireland, 4–7 June 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carterette, B., Chandar, P.: Probabilistic models of ranking novel documents for faceted topic retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2009, Hong Kong, China, 2–6 November 2009, pp. 1287–1296 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Radlinski, F., Dumais, S.T.: Improving personalized web search using result diversification. In: SIGIR 2006: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Seattle, Washington, USA, 6–11 August 2006, pp. 691–692 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. He, J., Hollink, V., de Vries, A.P.: Combining implicit and explicit topic representations for result diversification. In: The 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2012, Portland, OR, USA, 12–16 August 2012, pp. 851–860 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tao, K., Hauff, C., Houben, G.-J.: Building a microblog corpus for search result diversification. In: Banchs, R.E., Silvestri, F., Liu, T.-Y., Zhang, M., Gao, S., Lang, J. (eds.) AIRS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8281, pp. 251–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Clarke, C.L.A., Kolla, M., Cormack, G.V., Vechtomova, O., Ashkan, A., Büttcher, S., MacKinnon, I.: Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2008, Singapore, 20–24 July 2008, pp. 659–666 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.D.: A risk minimization framework for information retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 42(1), 31–55 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, Y., Luo, Z., Yu, Y. (2016). Learning for Search Results Diversification in Twitter. In: Cui, B., Zhang, N., Xu, J., Lian, X., Liu, D. (eds) Web-Age Information Management. WAIM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9659. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39958-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39958-4_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39957-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39958-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics