Exploring the Relationship Between Computer Proficiency and Computer Use Over Time in the PRISM Trial

  • Walter R. BootEmail author
  • Joseph Sharit
  • Sara J. Czaja
  • Neil Charness
  • Wendy A. Rogers
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9755)


The aim of the PRISM trial was to examine the potential benefits of a Personal Reminder Information and Social Management (PRISM) computer system on the well-being and perceived social support of an older adult sample at risk for social isolation. Participants (N = 300) were randomly assigned to receive the PRISM system, which was designed to support social connections, information gathering, prospective memory, and access to local and national resources, or a binder that contained similar information. The intervention lasted one year, and the computer usage of the PRISM group was monitored. This trial represented a unique opportunity to explore potential barriers to the adoption and continued use of information and communications technologies. Specifically, this paper explored the relationship between computer proficiency and use of the PRISM system over time. Contrary to what one might predict, participants with initially low proficiency used the system more over the course of the trial (r(123) = −.22, p < .05). The fact that even those with the lowest levels or proficiency were able to become among the most active PRISM users may reflect that the system was designed well for older adult computer novices (the intended target of the intervention). Over the course of the trial, participants assigned to the PRISM condition improved substantially in their computer proficiency. Increased computer proficiency from baseline to 12 months was a much strong predictor of system use (r(123) = .53, p < .001), possibly reflecting increased proficiency as a result of greater use over time. Overall, data suggest a complex relationship between computer use, computer proficiency, and changes in computer proficiency over time worthy of additional exploration to further understand the effects of, and barriers to, the use of information and communications technologies.


Older adults Technology Computer proficiency 



We gratefully acknowledge support from the National Institute on Aging, NIA 3 PO1 AG017211, Project CREATE III– Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement ( Data were collected as part of a larger trial examining the benefits of the PRISM system, with a focus on social isolation and social support [ Identifier: NCT0149761]. In support of the PRISM project we also acknowledge and appreciate the assistance of Tracy Mitzner, Chin Chin Lee, and Sankaran Nair.


  1. 1.
    Charness, N., Boot, W.R.: Aging and information technology use potential and barriers. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18(5), 253–258 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi, M., Kong, S., Jung, D.: Computer and internet interventions for loneliness and depression in older adults: a meta-analysis. Healthc. Inf. Res. 18, 191–198 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, M.: Technology device ownership: 2015. Pew Research Center. (2015).
  4. 4.
    Zickuhr, K.: Who’s not online and why. Pew Research Center (2013).
  5. 5.
    Czaja, S.J., Charness, N., Fisk, A.D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S.N., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychol. Aging 21(2), 333–352 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, F.D., Davis, G.B.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J.: Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J.: Designing Training and Instructional Programs for Older Adults. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Czaja, S.J., Boot, W.R., Charness, N., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J., Fisk, A.D., Nair, S.N.: The personalized reminder information and social management system (PRISM) trial: rationale, methods and baseline characteristics. Contemp. Clin. Trials 40, 35–46 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boot, W.R., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J., Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D., Nair, S.: Computer proficiency questionnaire: assessing low and high computer proficient seniors. Gerontologist 55(3), 404–411 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mitzner, T.L., Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D., Boot, W.R., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J.: Predicting older adults’ perceptions about a computer system designed for seniors. Universal Access in Information Systems (in press)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roque, N.A., Boot, W.R.: A new tool for assessing mobile device proficiency in older adults: the mobile device proficiency questionnaire. J. Appl. Gerontol. (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter R. Boot
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joseph Sharit
    • 2
  • Sara J. Czaja
    • 3
  • Neil Charness
    • 1
  • Wendy A. Rogers
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  4. 4.School of PsychologyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations