Usability Assessment of a Virtual Fitness Platform on Smart TV for Elderly Health Promotion

  • Chao-Hua WangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9755)


The elderly maintain healthy by exercise and friendships connection which not only can reduce the cost of social care but also can contribute their knowledge and experiences to help the younger generation. This study is aimed to investigate the usability and functionalities of the fitness platform with multi-user virtual situations on smart TV service content, which was developed by the author. The main modules of the platform include limb movements driven by motion sensing interaction with Kinect, contactless graphical user interface, alternative 3D avatars and situational environments, synchronous interaction of distributed multi-users, and interface of unified computing health data. Group interview and a questionnaire were designed to evaluate the feasibility and usability associated with using the virtual fitness platform. A total of 40 elderly users assess this set of content service. The results of this study showed that most of the users are satisfied by the system functionality and usability. Furthermore, the platform also offers the interface for data connecting the wearable devices which assist in increasing the effectiveness of the real time elderly health maintenance.


Elderly health promotion Virtual fitness platform Motion sensing Smart TV Usability assessment 



This study is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan with grant No: MOST 130-2218-E-025-001.


  1. 1.
    Larson, E.B., Wang, L., Bowen, J.D., McCormick, W.C., Teri, L., Crane, P.: Exercise is associated with reduced risk for incident dementia among persons 65 years of age and older. Ann. Intern. Med. 144(2), 73–81 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al Mahmud, A., Mubin, O., Shahid, S., Martens, J.B.: Designing and evaluating the tabletop game experience for senior citizens. In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges, pp. 403–406. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beswick, A.D., Rees, K., Dieppe, P., Ayis, S., Gooberman-Hill, R., Horwood, J., Ebrahim, S.: Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 371(9614), 725–735 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ingrosso, A., Volpi, V., Opromolla, A., Sciarretta, E., Medaglia, C.M.: UX and usability on smart TV: a case study on a T-commerce application. In: Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Tan, C.-H. (eds.) HCIB 2015. LNCS, vol. 9191, pp. 312–323. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shin, D.H., Hwang, Y., Choo, H.: Smart TV: are they really smart in interacting with people? understanding the interactivity of Korean smart TV. Behav. Inf. Technol. 32(2), 156–172 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Hsiao, S.L., Yang, H.L.: A service experience engineering (SEE) method for developing new services. Int. J. Manag. 27(3), 437–447 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, K.J., Widagdo, J., Lin, Y.S., Yang, H.L., Hsiao, S.L.: A service innovation framework for start-up firms by integrating service experience engineering approach and capability maturity model. Serv. Bus. 2015, 1–50 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    United Nations.: Ageing in Asia and the Pacific: Emerging issues and successful practices/Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, New York, United Nations (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yamamoto, G., Hyry, J., Krichenbauer, M., Taketomi, T., Sandor, C., Kato, H., Pulli, P.: A user interface design for the elderly using a projection tabletop system. In: 2015 3rd IEEE VR International Workshop on Virtual and Augmented Assistive Technology (VAAT), pp. 29–32. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barnard, Y., Bradley, M.D., Hodgson, F., Lloyd, A.D.: Learning to use new technologies by older adults: perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(4), 1715–1724 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Portet, F., Vacher, M., Golanski, C., Roux, C., Meillon, B.: Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: acceptability and objection aspects. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 17(1), 127–144 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bolt, R.A.: “Put-that-there” voice and gesture at the graphics interface. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH 1980, pp. 262–270 (1980)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Microsoft.: Meet Kinect for Windows.
  15. 15.
    Bowman, D.A., et al.: A survey of usability evaluation in virtual environments: classification and comparison of methods. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 11(4), 404–424 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Multimedia DesignNational Taichung University of Science and TechnologyTaichungTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations