Advertisement

Smart Living for Elderly: Design and Human-Computer Interaction Considerations

  • Ranjana Sharma
  • Fiona Fui-Hoon NahEmail author
  • Kavya Sharma
  • Teja Satya Sai Santosh Katta
  • Natalie Pang
  • Alvin Yong
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9755)

Abstract

To address aging challenges, we examine the concept of smart living and its applications for the elderly. Smart living refers to improving quality of life by transforming environments to become more intelligent and adaptable to users. In this paper, we discuss how smart living applications can help to address the needs of the elderly, as well as the design and human-computer interaction considerations for such applications.

Keywords

Smart living Elderly Design Human-computer interaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Missouri University of Science and Technology’s smart living signature area. http://research.mst.edu/signatureareas/smartliving/
  2. 2.
    Izekenova, A.K., Kumar, A.B., Abikulova, A.K., Izekenova, A.K.: Trends in ageing of the population and the life expectancy after retirement: a comparative country-based analysis. J. Res. Med. Sci.: Official J. Isfahan Univ. Med. Sci. 20(3), 250–252 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    United Nations. World population ageing: United Nations Publication (2013). http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2013.pdf
  4. 4.
    Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D.: Cognitive support for elders through technology. Generations 30(2), 38–43 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pendleton, H.M., Schultz-Krohn, W.: Pedretti’s occupational therapy: practice skills for physical dysfunction. Elsevier, St. Louis (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wallace, M., Shelkey, M.: How to try this: monitoring functional status in hospitalized older adults. Am. J. Nurs. 108(4), 64–72 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, S.B., Park, J.R., Yoo, J.H., Park, J.H., Lee, J.J., Yoon, J.C., Jhoo, J.H., Lee, D.Y., Woo, J.I., Han, J.W., Huh, Y., Kim, T.H., Kim, K.W.: Validation of the dementia care assessment packet-instrumental activities of daily living. Psychiatry Invest. 10(3), 238–245 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rogers, W.A., Meyer, B., Walker, N., Fisk, A.D.: Functional limitations to daily living tasks in the aged: a focus group analysis. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 40(1), 111–125 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shieh, L., Yeh, C., Lai, M.: Evaluating smart living technology strategies using the analytic network process. J. Test. Eval. 41(6), 1–13 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, M., Lughofer, E., Sakamura, K.: Information fusion in smart living technology innovations. Inf. Fusion 21, 1–2 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daniel, K., Cason, C.L., Ferrell, S.: Assistive technologies for use in the home to prolong independence. In: 2nd International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karmarkar, A.M., Chavez, E., Cooper, R.A.: Technology for successful aging and disabilities. In: Helal, A., Mokhtari, M., Abdulrazak, B. (eds.) The Engineering Handbook of Smart Technology for Aging, Disability, and Independence, pp. 27–48. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, C., Coughlin, J.F.: PERSPECTIVE: older adults’ adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 32(5), 747–759 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cheek, P., Nikpour, L., Nowlin, H.D.: Aging well with smart technology. Nurs. Adm. Q. 29(4), 329–338 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dohr, A., Modre-Opsrian, R., Drobics, M., Hayn, D., Schreier, G.: The internet of things for ambient assisted living. In: Seventh International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, pp. 804–809. IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deen, M.J.: Information and communications technologies for elderly ubiquitous healthcare in a smart home. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 19(3–4), 573–599 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Madhusudanan, J., Hariharan, S., Selvan, M.A., Venkatesan, V.P.: A generic middleware model for smart home. Int. J. Comput. Netw. Inf. Secur. 6(8), 19–25 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rialle, V., Duchene, F., Noury, N., Bajolle, L., Demongeot, J.: Health “Smart” home: information technology for patients at home. Telemedicine J. E-Health 8(4), 395–409 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hong, X., Nugent, C.D., Finlay, D.D., Mulvenna, M.: HomeADL for adaptive ADL monitoring within smart homes. In: 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 3324–3327. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Su, X., Tong, H., Ji, P.: Activity recognition with smartphone sensors. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 19(3), 235–249 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Le, Q., Nguyen, H.B., Barnett, T.: Smart homes for older people: positive aging in a digital world. Future Internet 4(2), 607–617 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Demiris, G., Hensel, B.K.: Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of “smart home” applications. Yearb. Med. Inf. 3, 33–40 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huber, L.L., Shankar, K., Caine, K., Connelly, K., Camp, L.J., Walker, B.A., Borrero, L.: How in-home technologies mediate caregiving relationships in later life. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 29(7), 441–455 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen, Y.H., Tsai, M.J., Fu, L.C., Chen, C.H., Wu, C.L., Zeng, Y.C.: Monitoring elder’s living activity using ambient and body sensor network in smart home. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 2962–2967. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hossain, M.S., Muhammad, G.: Cloud-assisted speech and face recognition framework for health monitoring. Mob. Netw. Appl. 20(3), 391–399 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lin, Z., Hanson, A.R., Osterweil, L.J., Wise, A.: Precise process definitions for activities of daily living: a basis for real-time monitoring and hazard detection. In: 3rd Workshop on Software Engineering in Health Care, pp. 13–16. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pirapinthan, M., Moulton, B., Lal, S.: Trends in home-based safety and health alert support systems for older people. In: 6th International Conference on Broadband and Biomedical Communications, pp. 206–212. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mynatt, E.D., Rowan, J., Craighill, S., Jacobs, A.: Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 333–340. ACM, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Erickson, J., Johnson, G.M.: Internet use and psychological wellness during late adulthood. Can. J. Aging 30(2), 197–209 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Abdulrazak, B., Mokhtari, M.: Assistive robotics for independent living. In: Helal, A., Mokhtari, M., Abdulrazak, B. (eds.) The Engineering Handbook of Smart Technology for Aging, Disability, and Independence, pp. 355–378. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhou, J., Rau, P.P., Salvendy, G.: Use and design of handheld computers for older adults: a review and appraisal. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 28(12), 799–826 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Baig, M.M., Gholamhosseini, H., Connolly, M.J.: A comprehensive survey of wearable and wireless ECG monitoring systems for older adults. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 51(5), 485–495 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Belic, D., Kunica, Z.: A concept of smart wheelchair. Ann. Fac. Eng. Hunedoara 13(1), 37–40 (2015)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Holzinger, A., Ziefle, M., Röcker, C.: Human-computer interaction and usability engineering for elderly (HCI4AGING): introduction to the special thematic session. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6180, pp. 556–559. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Effects of cognitive and personal factors on PDA menu navigation performance. Behav. Inf. Technol. 28(3), 251–268 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jia, P., Lu, Y., Wajda, B.: Designing for technology acceptance in an ageing society through multi-stakeholder collaboration. Procedia Manufact. 3, 3535–3542 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hawthorn, D.: Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interact. Comput. 12(5), 507–528 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kurniawan, S., Zaphiris, P.: Research-oriented web design guidelines for older people. In: Proceedings of the 7th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 129–135. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Henderson, V., Grinter, R.E., Starner, T.: Electronic communication by deaf teenagers. Technical report, Georgia Institute of Technology, College of Computing, GVU Center (2005)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gandy, M., Westeyn, T., Brashear, H., Starner, T.: Wearable systems design issues for aging or disabled users. In: Helal, A., Mokhtari, M., Abdulrazak, B. (eds.) The Engineering Handbook of Smart Technology for Aging, Disability, and Independence, pp. 317–338. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ziefle, M.: Information presentation in small screen devices: the trade-off between visual density and menu foresight. Appl. Ergonomics 41(6), 719–730 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F.: Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19(1), 25–59 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Heinemann, A.W., Pape, T.L.: Coping and adjustment. In: Scherer, M.J. (ed.) Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Successful Rehabilitation, pp. 123–141. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA (2001)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Burgess, A.M., Burgess, C.G.: Aging-in-place: present realities and future directions. Forum Public Policy J. Oxford Round Table 1, 1–17 (2007). http://forumonpublicpolicy.com/archive07/burgess.pdf Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dinev, T., Hart, P.: An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inf. Syst. Res. 17(1), 61–80 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cavoukian, A.: Privacy by design. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 31(4), 18–19 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Frisardi, V., Imbimbo, B.P.: Gerontechnology for demented patients: smart homes for smart aging. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 23(1), 143–146 (2011)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Demiris, G.: Interdisciplinary innovations in biomedical and health informatics graduate education. Methods Inf. Med. 46(1), 63–66 (2007)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
  50. 50.
  51. 51.
    Jones, W.D.: Keeping cars from crashing. IEEE Spectr. 38(9), 40–45 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
  53. 53.
    Chan, M., Esteve, D., Escriba, C., Campo, E.: A review of smart homes—Present state and future challenges. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 91(1), 55–81 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Peetoom, K.K., Lexis, M.A., Joore, M., Dirksen, C.D., De Witte, L.P.: Literature review on monitoring technologies and their outcomes in independently living elderly people. Disabil. Rehabil.: Assistive Technol. 10(4), 271–294 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ranjana Sharma
    • 1
  • Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kavya Sharma
    • 1
  • Teja Satya Sai Santosh Katta
    • 1
  • Natalie Pang
    • 2
  • Alvin Yong
    • 3
  1. 1.Missouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA
  2. 2.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.essentiallyMERIDIAN and ScentalWorldSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations