Advertisement

To Retain or to Recover National Brand Consumers? Effects of Price, Promotion and Product Innovation Strategies

  • Carmen AbrilEmail author
  • Joaquin Sanchez
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

This study addresses consumer switching between private labels and national brands. We empirically test the efficiency of product innovation, non-price promotions, and the price gap on two consumer-switching situations: recovering consumers that national brands lost to private labels and preventing consumers of national brands from migrating to private labels. We compare the effectiveness of these strategies using a Hazard model to simultaneously measure the effects on each consumer-switching situation. We find that the marketing strategies studied have different levels of effectiveness depending on whether the objective is to retain consumers or recover consumers lost to private labels. For example, reducing the price gap is a more effective strategy to prevent consumers from switching than to recover consumers from private labels. These results pose interesting managerial implications for both national brands and private labels.

Keywords

Private labels Price gap Switching Hazard models New products 

References

  1. Abril, C., & Martos-Partal, M. (2013). Is product innovation as effective for private labels as it is for national brands? Innovation, 15(3), 337–349.Google Scholar
  2. Abril, C., Sanchez, J., & García-Madariaga, J. (2015). The effect of product innovation, promotion, and price on consumer switching to private labels. Journal of Marketing Channels, 22(3), 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ailawadi, K. L., Neslin, S. A., & Gedenk, K. (2001). Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: Store brands versus manufacturer brand promotions. Journal of Marketing, 65, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blattberg, R., & Wisniewski, K. J. (1989). Price-induced patterns of competition. Marketing Science, 8, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cotterill, R., & Putsis, W. (2000). Market share and price setting behavior for private labels and manufacturer brands. Review of Industrial Organization, 17, 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fox, J. (2002). Cox proportional-hazards regression for survival data. In An R and S-PLUS companion to applied regression (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Garretson, J. A., Fisher, D., & Burton, S. (2002). Antecedents of private label attitude and manufacturer brand promotion attitude: Similarities and difference. Journal of Retailing, 78, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gedenk, K., & Neslin, S. (1999). The role of retail promotion on determining future brand loyalty: Its effect on purchase event feedback. Journal of Retailing, 75, 433–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gielens, K. (2012). New products: The antidote to private label growth? Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gielens, K., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2007). Drivers of consumer acceptance of new packaged goods: An investigation across products and countries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoch, S. J., & Banerji, S. (1993). When do private labels succeed? Sloan Management Review, 34, 57–67.Google Scholar
  12. Kamakura, W., & Russell, G. (1989). A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim, M., Kim, Y., & Schmidt, P. (2007). On the accuracy of bootstrap confidence intervals for efficiency levels in stochastic frontier models with panel data. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar, N., & Steenkamp, J. E. M. (2007). Private label strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lal, R. (1990). Price promotions: Limiting competitive encroachment. Marketing Science, 9, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manzur, E., Olavarrieta, S., Hidalgo, P., Farias, P., & Uribe, R. (2011). Store brand and manufacturer brand promotion attitudes antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 64, 286–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mills, D. E. (1999). Private labels and manufacturer counterstrategies. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(2), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neeley, L., & Van Auken, H. (2009). The relationship between owner characteristics and use of bootstrap financing methods. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 22, 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pauwels, K., & Srinivasan, S. (2004). Who benefits from private label entry? Marketing Science, 23, 364–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. PLMA. (2014). Yearbook. http://www.plmainternational.com
  21. Quelch, J. A., & Harding, D. (1996). Brands versus private labels: Fighting to win. Harvard Business Review, 74, 99–109.Google Scholar
  22. Rowley, J., Baregheh, A., & Sambrook, S. (2011). Towards an innovation-type mapping tool. Management Decision, 49, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sayman, S., Hoch, S., & Raju, S. (2002). Positioning of store brands. Marketing Science, 21, 378–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sayman, S., & Raju, J. (2007). Store brands: From back to the future. In N. K. Malhotra (Ed.), Review of marketing research. New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Schoenfeld, D. (1982). Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika, 69(1), 239–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Semeijn, J., Van Riel, A. C., & Ambrosini, A. B. (2004). Consumer evaluations of store brands: effects of store image and product attributes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(4), 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sethuraman, R. (2009). Assessing the external validity of analytical results from national brand and store brand competition models. Marketing Science, 28, 759–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sethuraman, R., & Cole, C. A. (1999). Factors influencing the price premiums that consumers pay for manufacturer brands over store brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8, 340–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sethuraman, R., & Gielens, K. (2014). Determinants of store brand share. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sethuraman, R., & Mittelstaedt, J. (1992). Coupons and private labels: A cross-category analysis of grocery products. Psychology & Marketing, 9, 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sprott, D. E., & Shimp, T. A. (2004). Using product sampling to augment the perceived quality of store brands. Journal of Retailing, 80, 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Srinivasan, S., Pauwels, K., Hanssens, D., & Dekimpe, M. (2004). Do promotions benefit manufacturers, retailers, or both? Management Science, 50, 617–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sriram, S., Balachander, S., & Kalwani, M. U. (2007). Monitoring the dynamics of brand equity using store-level data. Journal of Marketing, 71, 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Geyskens, I. (2013). Manufacturer and retailer strategies to impact store brand share: Global integration, local adaptation, and worldwide learning. Marketing Science, 33(1), 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steiner, R. L. (2004). The nature and benefits of manufacturer brand/private label competition. Review of Industrial Organization, 24, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Szymanowski, M., & Gijsbrechts, E. (2012). Consumption-based cross-brand learning: Are private labels really private? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Verhoef, P. C., Nijssen, E. J., & Sloot, L. M. (2002). Strategic reactions of manufacturer brand manufacturers towards private labels. European Journal of Marketing, 36, 1309–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsComplutense UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations