Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Financial Environment and Business Development pp 423–433Cite as

Tacit vs Explicit Knowledge Dichotomy: State-of-the-Art Review for Technology Transfer Purposes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 4))

Abstract

There is no consensus among scholars using and defining knowledge types and their interaction. Theoretical distinction between tacit and explicit knowledge has emerged. The tacit knowledge is positioned in contrast with the explicit knowledge as a result of this dichotomy. However, there are indications that every knowledge has both tacit and explicit elements that cannot exist one without the other—they are complementary and create synergy for the knowledge management. The aim of this paper is to explore relevance of knowledge distinction between the tacit and explicit knowledge for technology transfer purposes. Brief review of literature, draft discussion, and one-on-one interviews were performed in order to find the answer to the research question: Does distinction between tacit and explicit knowledge have place in the exploring of knowledge for technology transfer purposes? Content analysis was performed to process qualitative data that were collected through interviews. The research results show that the distinction between tacit and explicit knowledge is not suitable for technology transfer purposes. Knowledge consists of both tacit and explicit components. There is also an explanation for many contradictions in knowledge management studies exploring knowledge explicitness in this paper. The paper provides a better understanding of the issues related to tacit versus explicit knowledge dichotomy within technology transfer. There are theoretical implications as well as recommendations for future research in this study.

…we can know more than we can tell

Polanyi (1966, p. 4)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, T. J., & O’Shea, R. P. (2014). Introduction. In T. J. Allen & R. P. O’Shea (Eds.), Building technology transfer within research universities: An entrepreneurial approach (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Association of University Technology Managers, (n.d.). Bayh-Dole Act. Retrieved April 7, 2015, from http://www.autm.net/Bayh_Dole_Act1.htm

  • BusinessDictionary, (n.d.). Tacit knowledge. WebFinance, Inc. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/tacit-knowledge.html

  • Chobya, L. A. K., Eck, R. W., & Wyant, W. D. (1999). Teamwork and technology transfer in low-volume road safety. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1652(1), 59–67. Retrieved April 6, 2015, from http://apps.webofknowledge.com.resursi.rtu.lv/full_record.do?product=UA&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=12&SID=W2EOtmT2IJztz4Ykj3t&page=1&doc=1

  • Dasgupta, P., & Taneja, N. (2011). Low carbon growth: An Indian perspective on sustainability and technology transfer. Problems of Sustainable Development, 6(1), 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (2001). Knowledge (explicit and implicit): Philosophical aspects. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 8126–8132). Oxford: ElsevierScience Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dictionary.com Unabridged, (n.d.). Tacit. Random House, Inc. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tacit

  • European Commission. (2010a). Communication from the Commission. Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF

  • European Commission. (2010b). Project Europe 2030. Challenges and opportunities. A report to the European Council by the Reflection Group on the Future of the EU 2030. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from www.consilium.europa.eu/en/workarea/downloadasset.aspx?id=1081

  • Frechtling, J., Mark, M. M., Rog, D. J., Thomas, V., Frierson, H., Hood, S., Hughes, G., & Johnson, E. (2010). The 2010 User-friendly handbook for project evaluation. National Science Foundation. Retrieved April 1, 2015, from https://www.westat.com/sites/westat.com/files/2010UFHB.pdf

  • Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1992). The marketing and R & D interface (Working Paper). Cambridge: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotz, R., & Braun, B. (1993). Networks, milieux and individual firm strategies: Empirical evidence of an innovative SME environment. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography, 75(3), 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedesstrom, T., & Whitley, E. A. (2000). What is meant by tacit knowledge? Towards a better understanding of the shape of actions. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Information Systems, Trends in Information and Communication Systems for the 21st Century, ECIS 2000. Vienna, Austria, July 3–5, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M. (2012). Balancing between inward and outward technology transfer in open innovation paradigm (Working Paper). Espoo: Aalto University—School of Science. Retrieved April 7, 2015, from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2170967

  • Ichikawa, J. J., & Steup, M. (2014). The analysis of knowledge. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition). Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/knowledge-analysis

  • Jennex, M. (2008). Introductory chapter: Contemporary research in knowledge management. In M. Jennex (Ed.), Knowledge management: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. xxxviii–xxxix). New York: Hershey.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kneller, R. (2001). Technology transfer: A review for biomedical researchers. Clinical Cancer Research, 7(4), 761–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Persaud, A. (1999). Building technological capability through importing technology: The case of Indonesian manufacturing industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Gao, F. (2003). Why Nonaka highlights tacit knowledge: A critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., & Sugiyama, K. (2006). The concept of knowledge in KM: A dimensional model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mom, T. J. M., Oshri, I., & Volberda, H. W. (2012). The skills base of technology transfer professionals. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(9), 871–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, M. T., & Almonacid, S. (2005). Rethinking technology transfer. Journal of Food Engineering, 67(1–2), 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. L. (2007). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Online Etymology Dictionary, (n.d.). Tacit. Douglas Harper, Historian. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tacit

  • Phillips, R. (2002). Technology business incubators: How effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technology in Society, 24(3), 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puusa, A., & Eerikainen, M. (2010). Is tacit knowledge really tacit? Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(3), 307–318. Retrieved April 1, 2015, from http://www.ejkm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=280

  • Ray, T. (2009). Rethinking Polanyi’s concept of tacit knowledge: From personal knowing to imagined institutions. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 47(1), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., Takegami, S., & Yin, J. (2001). Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation, 21(4), 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salin, J. G. (2010). Problems and solutions in wood drying modelling: History and future. Wood Material Science and Engineering, 5(2), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sazali, A. W., & Raduan, C. R. (2011). The handbook of inter firm technology transfer: An integrated knowledge-based view and organizational learning perspective. Saarbrücken, Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sazali, A. W., Raduan, C. R., & Suzana, I. W. O. (2012). Defining the concepts of technology and technology transfer: A literature analysis. International Business Research, 5(1), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2012). Product design and development (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of California Museum of Paleontology. (2015). Misconceptions about science. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://undsci.berkeley.edu/teaching/misconceptions.php

  • Virtanen, I. (2009). How tacit is tacit knowledge? Proceedings of the ER 2009 PhD Colloquium. Retrieved April 1, 2015, from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-597/paper-3-1.pdf

  • Virtanen, I. (2010). Epistemological problems concerning explication of tacit knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 11(4). Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://www.tlainc.com/articl246.htm

  • Zhenhua, Y. (2003). Tacit knowledge/knowing and the problem of articulation. Tradition & Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 30(2), 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work has been supported by the European Social Fund within the project “Support for the implementation of doctoral studies at Riga Technical University.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia

    Mikus Dubickis & Elīna Gaile-Sarkane

Authors
  1. Mikus Dubickis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elīna Gaile-Sarkane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikus Dubickis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Political Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin

  2. MUFG Union Bank, San Francisco, California, USA

    Hakan Danis

  3. Faculty of Tourism, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ender Demir

  4. Eurasia Business and Economic Society, Fatih Istanbul, Turkey

    Ugur Can

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dubickis, M., Gaile-Sarkane, E. (2017). Tacit vs Explicit Knowledge Dichotomy: State-of-the-Art Review for Technology Transfer Purposes. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Financial Environment and Business Development. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39919-5_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation