Abstract
The persistent differences in environment-related taxes across countries may be considered as a source of competitive (dis)advantage depending on countries’ commitments to sustainable development and environmental protection. In this study, an attempt is made to overcome at least two deficiencies associated with previous literature concerning the influence of environmental stringency on trade flows among transition economies, the measurement of environmental stringency that rarely accounts for the direct impact of taxing pollutant emissions, and the common use of cross-section analysis encompassing transition economies. Although, economists and policy makers generally agree that prices should incorporate the full costs of environmental degradation and that market-based instruments present an effective environmental policy measures, the introduction and the use of these measures has remained limited. Previous literature has not studied the impact of environment-related taxes on relative export performance of transition economies’ heavy pollutant industries in a dynamic and an integrated framework that allows for more validated assessment of costs/benefits of environmental regulation. This research attempts to fill-in this gap in the literature. The results of panel analysis in this chapter seem to render support to the hypothesis of the least regulated transition economies, i.e., CEE EU member states tend to specialize in pollution-intensive industries and tend to benefit from differences in compliance with environmental regulation among EU countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The EU-15 comprised the following 15 countries: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom. Since data for Belgium and Luxembourg are distributed together since 1999, they are included in the estimates together.
References
Arouri, M. H., Ben Youssef, A., M’Henni, H., & Rault, C. (2012). Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Middle East and North African countries. Energy Policy, 45, 342–349.
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Journal Review, 89, 634–647.
Crespi, F., Ghisetti, C., & Quatraro, F. (2015). Environmental and innovation policies for the evolution of green technologies: A survey and a test. Eurasian Business Review, 5(2), 343–370.
Decramer, S., Fuss, C., & Konings, J. (2014, December). How do exporters react to changes in cost competitiveness? (Working Paper Series, No 1752). ECB.
Egger, P. (2000). A note on the proper econometric specification of the gravity equation. Economic Letters, 66, 25–31.
Franco, C., & Marin, G. (2014). The effect of within-sector, upstream and downstream energy taxes on innovation and productivity (FEEM Working Paper No. 103.2014).
Harris, M. N., Kónya, L., & Mátyás, L. (2002). Modelling the impact of environmental regulations on bilateral trade flows: OECD, 1990–1996. The World Economy, 25, 387–405.
Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441–487.
Hettige, H., Lucas, R. E. B., & Wheeler, D. (1992). The toxic intensity of industrial production: Global patterns, trends, and trade policy. American Economic Review, 82, 478–481.
Jug, J., & Mirza, D. (2005). Environmental regulations in gravity equations: Evidence from Europe. World Economy, 28, 1591–1615.
Mc Laughlin, P. A., & Coffey, B. (2009). Trade flow consequences of the European Union’s regionalization of environmental regulations (Working Paper No. 09-26). Mercatus Center George Mason University.
Micco, A., Stein, E., & Ordonez, G. (2003). The Currency Union effect on trade: Early evidence from the European Union. Economic Policy, 18, 315–356.
Nakamura, E. (2011). Does environmental investment really contribute to firm performance? An empirical analysis using Japanese firms. Eurasian Business Review, 1(2), 91–111.
Porter, M. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 168.
Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), 97–118.
Quiroga, M., Sterner, T., & Persson, M. (2007). Have countries with lax environmental regulations a comparative advantage in polluting industries? (Resources for the Future Discussion Papers series, dp-07-08).
Rubashkina, Y. (2014). Environmental policy stringency: Measurement and effects. [online] Accessed October 22, 2015, from https://tesionline.unicatt.it/bitstream/…/tesiphd_completa_Rubashkina.pdf
Tobey, J. (1990). The effects of domestic environmental policies on patterns of world trade: An empirical test. Kyklos, 43, 191–209.
van Beers, C., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (1997). An empirical multi-country analysis of the impact of environmental regulations on foreign trade flows. Kyklos, 50, 29–46.
van Beers, C., & van den Bergh, J. C. (2000). The impact of environmental policy on foreign trade: Tobey revisited with a bilateral flow model (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. 00-069/3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Silajdzic, S., Mehic, E. (2017). The Impact of Environmental Taxes on Competitive Performance of Pollution-Intensive Industries Among Transition Economies: Evidence from Panel Analysis. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Financial Environment and Business Development. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39919-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39919-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39918-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39919-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)