“Fake It or Make It” – Selfies in Corporate Social Media Campaigns

  • Tina Gruber-MueckeEmail author
  • Christiane Rau
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9742)


The usage of selfies has become increasingly popular as a central element in social media campaigns. This study interviewed 9 professionals from marketing agencies to explore the role of selfies in corporate social media campaigns. We identified three distinct types of selfies, i.e. “classic selfies”, “polished selfies”, and “faked selfies”. We found that professionals strive for perceived authenticity of user communication (which is best conveyed by “classic selfies”), while they want to maintain control over the campaigns (e.g. to ensure the aesthetic value and the ad authenticity) leading to the use of “polished selfies” or “faked selfies”. As a result of this tension, we identified three distinct approaches agencies and their clients adopt balancing this tension. Our research offers insights how to design and manage selfie campaigns.


Social media Selfie Corporate branding 


  1. 1.
    Vranica, S.: A ‘Crisis’ in Online Ads: One-Third of Traffic Is Bogus. Wall Street Journal (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golding, N.: How many ‘likes’? Does your business have a place on Instagram?
  3. 3.
    Svelander, A., Wiberg, M.: The practice of selfies. Interactions 22, 34–38 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    OxfordWords blog: Oxford Dictionaries Word of the Year 2013: Selfie (2013). [Accessed 01/30/2016] (2013)
  5. 5.
    Deller, R.A., Tilton, S.: Selfies as charitable meme: charity and national identity in the #nomakeupselfie and #thumbsupforstephen campaigns. Int. J. Commun. 9, 1788–1805 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sorokowski, P., Sorokowska, A., Oleszkiewicz, A., Frackowiak, T., Huk, A., Pisanski, K.: Selfie posting behaviors are associated with narcissism among men. Pers. Individ. Differ. 85, 123–127 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saltz, J.: Art at arm’s length: a history of the selfie. N.Y. Mag. 47, 71–75 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Birkner, C.: Sharing the LOVE. Mark. News 45, 11–12 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luxton, S., Reid, M., Mavondo, F.: Integrated marketing communication capability and brand performance. J. Advertising 44, 37–46 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! challenges Opportunities Soc. Media Bus. Horiz. 53, 59–68 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carroll, G.R., Wheaton, D.R.: The organizational construction of authenticity: an examination of contemporary food and dining in the US. Res. Organ. Behav. 29, 255–282 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grayson, K., Martinec, R.: Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality and their influence on assessment of authentic market offerings. J. Consum. Res. 31, 296–312 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fuchs, C., Schreier, M., van Osselaer, S.M.J.: The handmade effect: what’s love got to do with it? J. Mark. 79, 98–110 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Napoli, J., Dickinson, S.J., Beverland, M.B., Farrelly, F.: Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. J. Bus. Res. 67, 1090–1098 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bruhn, M., Schoenmüller, V., Schäfer, D., Heinrich, D.: Brand authenticity: towards a deeper understanding of its conceptualization and measurement. Adv. Consum. Res. 40, 567–576 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stern, B.: Authenticity and the textual persona: postmodern paradoxes in advertising narrative. Int. J. Res. Mark. 11, 387–400 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miller, F.: Ad authenticity: an alternative explanation of advertising’s effect on established brand attitudes. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advertising 36, 177–194 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fine, G.A.: Crafting authenticity: the validation of identity in self-taught art. Theor. Soc. 32, 153–180 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gilmore, J.H., Pine II, J.B.: Authenticity: What Consumers Really Want. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holt, D.B.: Poststructuralist lifestyle analysis: conceptualizing the social patterning of consumption on post-modernity. J. Consum. Res. 23, 326–350 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beverland, M.B.: Crafting brand authenticity: the case of luxury wines. J. Manag. Stud. 42, 1003–1029 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Beverland, M.B.: Building Brand Authenticity: Seven Habits of Iconic Brands. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Holt, D.B.: Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectic theory of consumer culture and branding. J. Consum. Res. 29, 70–90 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Keller, K.L.: Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J. Mark. 57, 1–22 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chalmers, T.D., Price, L.L.: Perceptions of authenticity in advertisements: negotiating the inauthentic. Adv. Consum. Res. 36, 72–75 (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gilpin, D., Palazzolo, E., Brody, N.: Socially mediated authenticity. J. Commun. Manag. 14, 258–278 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grow, G., Ward, J.: The role of authenticity in electoral social media campaigns. First Monday 18, 1–15 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Coleman, S., Moss, G.: Governing at a distance – politicians in the blogosphere. Inf. Polity 13, 7–20 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Montgomery, M.: The uses of authenticity: speaking from experience in a UK election broadcast. Commun. Rev. 4, 447–462 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beverland, M.B., Luxton, S.: Managing integrated marketing communication (IMC) through strategic decoupling: how luxury wine firms retain brand leadership while appearing to be wedded to the past. J. Advertising 34, 103–116 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kadirov, D., Varey, R.J., Wooliscroft, B.: Authenticity: a macromarketing perspective. J. Macromarketing 24, 73–79 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kadirov, D.: Private labels ain’t bona fide! Perceived authenticity and willingness to pay a price premium for national brands over private labels. J. Mark. Manag. 311, 773–1798 (2015)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Marshall, C., Rossman, G.B.: Designing Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (1999)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Scheiner, C.W., Eder, A., Goranova, M., Baccarella, C., Voigt, K.I.: The use and evaluation of social media by new enterprises in Germany – an empirical analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Marketing Trends Conference, Venice (2014). Accessed 31 Jan 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Interactive Media and Educational TechnologiesDanube University KremsKremsAustria
  2. 2.Centre of Innovation and Product ManagementUniversity of Applied Sciences Upper AustriaWelsAustria

Personalised recommendations