Advertisement

Social Media - New Face of Collaborative Policing?

A Survey Exploring Perceptions, Behavior, Challenges for Police Field Officers and Residents
  • Niharika SachdevaEmail author
  • Ponnurangam Kumaraguru
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9742)

Abstract

Online social media (OSM) has become a preferred choice of police to communicate and collaborate with citizens for improved safety. Various studies investigate perceptions and opinion of high ranked police officers on use of OSM in policing, however, understanding and perceptions of field level police personnel is largely unexplored. We collected survey responses of 445 police personnel and 204 citizens’ survey in India to understand perceptions on OSN use for policing. Further, we analyzed posts from Facebook pages of Indian police organizations to study the behavior of police and citizens as they pursue social and safety goals on OSN. We find that success of OSN for policing demands effective communication between the stakeholders (citizens and police). Our results show preliminary evidences that OSN use for policing can help (1) increase participation in problem solving process, (2) increase community engagement by providing unique channel for both Feedback and Anonymity. However, such a system will need appropriate acknowledgment and trustworthiness channels to be successful. We also identify challenges in adopting OSN and outline design opportunities for HCI researchers and practitioners to design tools supporting social interactions for policing.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdalla, A., Yayilgan, S.Y.: A review of using online social networks for investigative activities. In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) SCSM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8531, pp. 3–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chermak, S., Weiss, A.: An analysis of police-media relations. J. Crim. Justice 33, 501–512 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Choudhury, M., Monroy-Hernandez, A., Mark, G.: “Narco” emotions: affect and desensitization in social media during the mexican drug war. In: Proceedings of CHI 2014. ACM (2014). http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=208580
  4. 4.
    Cobb, C., McCarthy, T., Perkins, A., Bharadwaj, A., Comis, J., Do, B., Starbird, K.: Designing for the deluge: understanding and supporting the disturbed, collaborative work of crisis volunteers. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Denef, S., Bayerl, P.S., Kaptein, N.: Social media and the police - tweeting practices of British police forces during the August 2011 riots. In: Proceedings of CHI 2013, pp. 3471–3480. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Denef, S., Kaptein, N., Bayerl, P.S.: ICT Trends in European Policing: The COMPOSITEProject (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Express News Service: Is community policing need of the hour? (2013). http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/karnataka/article1430481.ece
  8. 8.
    Gupta, A., Kumaraguru, P.: Twitter explodes with activity in mumbai blasts! a lifeline or an unmonitored daemon in the Lurking? Technical report, IIIT-Delhi (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gupta, A., Kumaraguru, P.: Misinformation on twitter during crisis events. In: Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining (ESNAM), Springer Publications (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gupta, A., Lamba, H., Kumaraguru, P.: $ 1.00 per RT #BostonMarathon #PrayForBoston: Analyzing Fake Content on Twitter. eCrime Research Summit (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta, A., Joshi, A., Kumaraguru, P.: Identifying and characterizing user communities on Twitter during crisis events. In: Workshop on UMSocial, Co-located with CIKM (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heverin, T., Zach, L.: Twitter for city police department information sharing. In: Proceedings of ASIST 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hughes, A.L., St. Denis, L.A.A., Palen, L., Anderson, K.A.: Online public communications by police & fire services during the 2012 Hurricane Sandy. In: Proceedings of CHI 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hughes, A., Palen, L., Sutton, J., Liu, S., Vieweg, S.: “Site- Seeing” in disaster: an examination of on-line social convergence. In: Proceedings of ISCRAM 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Kumaraguru, P.: Riots in Muzaffarnagar (Uttar Pradesh), India. Technical report, IIIT-Delhi, September 2013Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lexis Nexis Risk Solutions: Survey of Law Enforcement Personnel and Their Use of Social Media in Investigations (2012). www.lexisnexis.com/investigations
  19. 19.
    López, C.A., Butler, B.S.: Consequences of content diversity for online public spaces for local communities. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2013, pp. 673–682. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., Castillo, C.: Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? In: Proceedings of Social Media Analytics, SOMA 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nayak, V.: 92 Million Facebook Users Makes India The Second Largest Country[STUDY] (2014). http://www.dazeinfo.com/2014/01/07/facebook-inc-fb-india-demographic-users-2014
  22. 22.
    Palen, L., Vieweg, S.: The emergence of online widescale interaction: assiatance, alliance and retreat. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peak, K.J., Glensor, R.W.: Community Policing and Problem Solving: Strategies and Practices. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Plane, B.: [Infographic] How Police Departments Use Twitter (2013). http://connectedcops.net/2013/04/23/infographic-how-police-departments-use-twitter/
  25. 25.
    Qu, Y., Wu, P., Wang, X.: A case study of Tianya forum in the 2008 China earthquake. In: Proceedings of 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sachdeva, N., Kumaraguru, P.: Online social networks and police in India - understanding the perceptions, behavior, challenges. In: Proceedings of ECSCW 2015, pp. 183–203 (2015a). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4_10
  27. 27.
    Sachdeva, N., Kumaraguru, P.: Social networks for police and residents in India: exploring online communication for crime prevention. In: Proceedings of dg.o 2015, pp. 256–265. ACM (2015b)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Semaan, B., Mark, G.: ‘Facebooking’ towards crisis recovery and beyond: disruption as an opportunity. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2012, pp. 27–36 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Starbird, K., Palen, L.: “Voluntweeters”: self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp. 1071–1080 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    The Times of India: Fearing attacks, 5000 people from northeast flee Bangalore (2012). http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bangalore/Fearing-attacks-5000-people-from-northeast-flee-Bangalore/articleshow/15512723.cms
  31. 31.
    Vieweg, S., Hughes, A., Starbird, K., Palen, L.: Micro-blogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In: Proceedings of CHI 2010, pp. 1079–1088 (2010)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang, Y., Leon, P.G., Acquisti, A., Cranor, L.F., Forget, A., Sadeh, N.: A field trial of privacy nudges for Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2367–2376. ACM (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indraprastha Institute of Information TechnologyDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations