Skip to main content

Agent-Based Modeling—A Tool for Urban Resilience Research?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Resilience-related topics have been gaining importance for urban planners and policy makers over the last decades. In this chapter, we argue that agent-based modeling (ABM) offers a promising tool to assess and test resilience-related measures which are planned and implemented in urban neighborhoods. We demonstrate potentials, but also limitations of the method, using the concept of urban electricity sharing as a demonstration case. Electricity sharing systems are based on decentralized electricity generation and large batteries. The availability of such a system can provide local communities with a back-up system during black-outs, which may occur in the aftermath of catastrophic events such as natural or man-made disasters. When real-world tests are costly or impossible, agent-based models can be used to investigate possible collective behaviors and inefficiencies of such a system. Despite limitations when extrapolating results from simulation runs to the real world, and several other challenges, we conclude that the utilization of agent-based models can very well aid planners and policy makers in designing more resilient cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We used NetLogo version 5.3. There are numerous alternative software packages for implementing ABM, e.g. Anylogic, Ascape, Gama, MASON, MATSim or Repast. Some advantages of NetLogo are free accessibility, beginner-friendliness and easy graphical representation of models.

References

  • Agudelo-Vera, C. M., Leduc, W. R. W., Mels, A. R., & Rijnaarts, H. H. M. (2012). Harvesting urban resources towards more resilient cities. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 64, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (2006). Agent-based modeling as a bridge between disciplines. In K. L. Judd & L. Tesfatsion (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics: Agent-based computational economics (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston, M., Liu, Z., Jacques, C., & Mitrani-Reiser, J. (2014). Towards assessing the resilience of a community in seismic events using agent based modeling. In: Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (distributor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudermann, T. (2010). Massenpsychologie. Psychologische Ansteckung, kollektive Dynamiken, Simulationsmodelle (German Edition). Wien/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudermann, T. (2014). Mass psychology revisited: Insights from social psychology, neuroscience and simulation. In U. Weidmann, U. Kirsch, & M. Schreckenberg (Eds.), Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics 2012 (pp. 39–54). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brudermann, T., & Fenzl, T. (2010). Agent-based modelling: A new approach in viral marketing research. In: R. Terlutter, S. Diehl, & S. Okazaki, (Eds.), Advances in advertising research: Cutting edge international research (Vol. 1, pp. 397–412). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudermann, T., Reinsberger, K., Orthofer, A., Kislinger, M., & Posch, A. (2013). Photovoltaics in agriculture: A case study on decision making of farmers. Energy Policy, 61, 96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brudermann, T., & Yamagata, Y. (2014a). Towards studying collective dynamics of electricity sharing systems. Energy Procedia, 61, 975–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brudermann, T., & Yamagata, Y. (2014b). Towards an agent-based model of urban electricity sharing. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference and Utility Exhibition on Green Energy for Sustainable Development, ICUE 2014, (pp. 1–5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella, T. J. (2006). Urban resilience and the recovery of New Orleans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(2), 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimellaro, G. P., Roh, H., & Koh, Y. (2014). Applying control theories and ABM to improve resilience-based design of systems. In: Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (distributor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cong, R.-G., Smith, H. G., Olsson, O., & Brady, M. (2014). Managing ecosystem services for agriculture: Will landscape-scale management pay? Ecological Economics, 99, 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte, R., Gilbert, N., Bonelli, G., Cioffi-Revilla, C., Deffuant, G., Kertesz, J., et al. (2012). Manifesto of computational social science. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottineau, C., Chapron, P., & Reuillon, R. (2015). Growing models from the bottom up. An evaluation-based incremental modelling method (EBIMM) applied to the simulation of systems of cities. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(4), 9–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, A., Castle, C., & Batty, M. (2008). Key challenges in agent-based modelling for geo-spatial simulation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32(6), 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Orazio, M., Quagliarini, E., Bernardini, G., & Spalazzi, L. (2014). EPES—Earthquake pedestrians’ evacuation simulator: A tool for predicting earthquake pedestrians’ evacuation in urban outdoor scenarios. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10, 153–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, C. M., & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2009). An agent-based approach to model future residential pressure on a regional landscape. Landscape Ecology, 24(9), 1237–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, R. L., & Janssen, M. A. (2005). Computational models of collective behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 424–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotts, N. M., Polhill, J. G., & Law, A. N. (2003). Agent-based simulation in the study of social dilemmas. Artificial Intelligence Review, 19(1), 3–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, D., Haase, A., Kabisch, N., Kabisch, S., & Rink, D. (2012). Actors and factors in land-use simulation: The challenge of urban shrinkage. Environmental Modelling and Software, 35, 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckbert, S., Baynes, T., & Reeson, A. (2010). Agent-based modeling in ecological economics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185, 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbing, D. (2001). Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, 73(4), 1067–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbing, D., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T. (2000). Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature, 407(6803), 487–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoste, G. R. G., Dvorak, M. J., & Jacobson, M. Z. (2009). Matching hourly and peak demand by combining different renewable energy sources—A case study for California in 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabareen, Y. (2013). Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities, 31, 220–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, R., Birkin, M., & Evans, A. (2014). An agent-based model of residential mobility. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 48, 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanta, L., & Zechman, E. (2013). Complex adaptive systems framework to assess supply-side and demand-side management for urban water resources. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(1), 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesling, E., Günther, M., Stummer, C., & Wakolbinger, L. M. (2011). Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: A review. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 20(2), 183–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koinegg, J., Brudermann, T., Posch, A., & Mrotzek, M. (2013). “It would be a shame if we did not take advantage of the spirit of the times …” An analysis of prospects and barriers of building integrated photovoltaics. GAIA, 22(1), 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leichenko, R. (2011). Climate change and urban resilience. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(3), 164–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovric, M., Kaymak, U., & Spronk, J. (2010). Modeling investor sentiment and overconfidence in an agent-based stock market. Human Systems Management, 29(2), 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menoni, S., Molinari, D., Parker, D., Ballio, F., & Tapsell, S. (2012). Assessing multifaceted vulnerability and resilience in order to design risk-mitigation strategies. Natural Hazards, 64(3), 2057–2082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, H. (2012). Agent-based simulation of urban infrastructure asset management activities. Automation in Construction, 28, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. T., Murray-Rust, D., Rieser, V., Milicic, V., & Rounsevell, M. (2012). Modelling the impacts of land system dynamics on human well-being: Using an agent-based approach to cope with data limitations in Koper, Slovenia. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(2), 164–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., Kahlenberg, D., Haase, D., & Seppelt, R. (2012). ABMland—A tool for agent-based model development on urban land use change. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 15(2), 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. F., Daffara, P., O’Toole, K., Matthews, J., Thomsen, D. C., Inayatullah, S., et al. (2011). A method for building community resilience to climate change in emerging coastal cities. Futures, 43(7), 673–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S. J., Malanson, G. P., Entwisle, B., Rindfuss, R. R., Mucha, P. J., Heumann, B. W., et al. (2013). Design of an agent-based model to examine population-environment interactions in Nang Rong District, Thailand. Applied Geography, 39, 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (1999). “NetLogo”. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagata, Y., & Seya, H. (2013). Spatial electricity sharing system for making city more resilient against X-Events. Innovation and Supply Chain Management, 7(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, Y., Torrens, P. M., Ghanem, R. G., & Kevrekidis, I. G. (2012). Accelerating agent-based computation of complex urban systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(10), 1917–1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Brudermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brudermann, T., Hofer, C., Yamagata, Y. (2016). Agent-Based Modeling—A Tool for Urban Resilience Research?. In: Yamagata, Y., Maruyama, H. (eds) Urban Resilience. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics