Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Resilience to Transformation Via a Regenerative Sustainability Development Path

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Resilience

Abstract

Urban resilience frameworks and strategies currently taken up in cities around the globe fall short of adequately preparing urban communities for the scale of change that many will face in coming decades. For cities aiming to address the impacts of climate change in a proactive sense as well as post-disaster, urban resilience presents itself as a useful frame, grounded in both ecological systems theory and psychological theory. This chapter tackles the question of where the notion of resilience helps, and where it holds cities back, in terms of urban planning and policy. Resilience in the urban planning and policy context may hold cities back because it lacks normative value in social and political spheres. That is, while concepts such as social justice and sustainable development suggest a normative direction for planning toward the improvement of our communities, resilience thinking does not imply any value-based criteria by which communities might determine how best to “bounce back” or “bounce forward.” Additional tools for urban resilience planning are needed, and we suggest and elaborate here upon two: the development path and regenerative sustainability. The notion of the development path originated within the IPCC process and draws upon futures studies, scenario planning and backcasting, in order to understand the social and political change and decision making implications of responding to climate change. The second concept we offer, regenerative sustainability, can be considered as the work of increasing the capacity of the current generation to give back more than we receive. The contribution of these two concepts to the value of urban resilience thinking in political contexts is explained through a discussion of five possible scenarios of urban transformation, which vary in terms of the social and political intentions at work in the strategies needed to build resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2003). Social aspects of adaptive capacity. In J. Smith, R. Klein, & S. Huq (Eds.), Climate change, adaptive capacity and development (pp. 29–49). London: Imperial College Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Auld, G., Mallett, A., Burlica, B., Nolan-Poupart, F., & Slater, R. (2014). Evaluating the effects of policy innovations: Lessons from a systematic review of policies promoting low-carbon technology. Global Environmental Change, 29, 444–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autonomous Geographies Collective. (2010). Beyond scholar activism: Making strategic interventions inside and outside the neoliberal university. ACME: An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies, 9(2), 245–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, R., Haas-Lyons, S., & Robinson, J. (2012). What’s there not to ‘like’? The technical affordances of sustainability deliberations on Facebook. JeDEM, 4(1), 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok, A. (2012). Greening cosmopolitan urbanism? On the transnational mobility of low-carbon formats in Northern European and East Asian cities. Environment and Planning A, 44(10), 2327–2343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience—Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59, 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2000). The urban question as a scale question: reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 361–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, S. (2010). Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: Insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Global Environmental Change, 20(2), 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, S., Shaw, A., Dale, A., & Robinson, J. (2014). Triggering transformative change: A development path approach to climate change response in communities. Climate Policy, 14(4), 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Dreborg, K. H., Moll, H. C., & Padovan, D. (2008). Participative backcasting: A tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning. Futures, 40(1), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Sheppard, S. R. J., Shaw, A., Flanders, D., Burch, S., Taylor, W., et al. (2012). Downscaling and visioning of mountain snow packs and other climate change implications in North Vancouver, British Columbia. Mitigation Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17(1), 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. S., & Perry, K. M. E. (2011). Like a fish out of water: Reconsidering disaster recovery and the role of place and social capital in community disaster resilience. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 395–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A., et al. (2013). Meeting the climate change challenge case studies. Available online at: http://mc-3.ca/case-studies

  • Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., et al. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreborg, K. H. (1996). Essence of backcasting. Futures, 28(9), 813–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S. (1997). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental discourses (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraydin, A., & Tasan-Kok, T. (Eds.). (2013). Resilience thinking in urban planning. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., & Abrahamse, W. (2009). Beyond rhetoric: The possibilities of and for ‘sustainable lifestyles’. Environmental Politics, 18(4), 486–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. (2015). Resilience and justice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, L., Harms, L., Howell-Meurs, S., Block, K., Lusher, D., & Richardson, J. (2015). Community well-being: Applications for a disaster context. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 30(3), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. B., Hassan, S., Holtz, S., Tansey, J., & Whitelaw, G. (2005). Sustainability assessment: Criteria and processes. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 4, 136–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. F. (2013). Rethinking private authority: Agents and entrepreneurs in global environmental governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haas-Lyons, S., Walsh, M., Aleman, E., & Robinson, J. (2014). Exploring regional futures: Lessons from Metropolitan Chicago’s online MetroQuest. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H., Wiener, J., & Warner, K. (2012). From fatalism to resilience: Reducing disaster impacts through systematic investments. Disasters, 36, 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2009). Cities mediating technological transitions: Understanding visions, intermediation and consequences. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(4), 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010). Can cities mediate socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, 39(4), 447–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, M. (2011). Public participation and local sustainability: Questioning a common agenda in urban governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 312–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, J., & Robèrt, K. H. (2000). Backcasting—A framework for strategic planning. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 7(4), 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, R. (2008). The transition handbook. Totnes, UK: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2014). Why are policy innovations rare and so often negative? Blame avoidance and problem denial in climate change policy-making. Global Environmental Change, 29, 395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, A.E.G., Gibbs, D., & While, A. (2011). The new urban politics as a politics of carbon control. Urban Studies, 48(12), 2537–2554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Hilden, M., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., Schoenfeld, J., et al. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change,. doi:10.1038/nclimate2725

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, H., Peck, J. & Sheppard, E.S. (2007). Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban frontiers. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander, S. L., Bows, A., Anderson, K. L., Shackley, S., Agnolucci, P., & Ekins, P. (2008). The Tyndall decarbonisation scenarios—Part I: Development of a backcasting methodology with stakeholder participation. Energy Policy, 36(10), 3754–3763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R. (2013). Constructing sustainability science: Emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G., de Vries, B., Fenhann, J., Gaffin, S., et al. (2000). IPCC Special Report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quist, J. (2007). Backcasting for a sustainable future: The impact after 10 years. Eburon Uitgeverij BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quist, J., & Vergragt, P. (2006). Past and future of backcasting: The shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures, 38(9), 1027–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. B. (1988). Unlearning and backcasting: Rethinking some of the questions we ask about the future. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 33(4), 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2008). Being undisciplined: Transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond. Futures, 40(1), 70–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., & Cole, R. (2015). Theoretical underpinnings of regenerative sustainability. Building Research & Information, 43(2), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., & Herbert, D. (2001). Integrating climate change and sustainable development. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 1(2), 130–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., Morita, T., Adegbulugbe, A., Alcamo, J., Herbert, D., Lebre La Rovere, E., et al. (2001). Greenhouse gas emissions: Mitigation scenarios and implications. In B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart, & J. Pan (Eds.), Climate change 2001: Mitigation (pp. 115–166). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., Burch, S., Talwar, S., O’Shea, M., & Walsh, M. (2011). Envisioning sustainability: Recent progress in the use of participatory backcasting approaches for sustainability research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 756–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (2011). Bird on Fire: Lessons from the world’s least sustainable city. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, J., Robinson, J., & Wiek, A. (2010). Participatory methods of integrated assessment—A review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(5), 697–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathaye, J., Najam, A., Cocklin, C., Heller, T., Lecocq, F., Llanes-Regueiro, J., et al. (2007) Sustainable development and mitigation. In B. Metz, O. R. Davidson, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave, & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Available online: http://www.ipcc-wg3.de/assessment-reports/fourth-assessment-report/.files-ar4/Chapter12.pdf

  • Scott, M. (2013). Editorial. Planning Theory and Practice, 14(4), 429–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S. R. J., Mathew Iype, D., Cote, S., & Salter, J. (2015). Special Report—A synthesis of PICS-funded social mobilization research. Prepared for Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions (PICS). Climate Change: Impacts & Responses Conference, April 2015, Victoria, BC. http://pics.uvic.ca/synthesis-pics-funded-social-mobilization-research

  • Sheppard, S. R. J., Pond, E., & Campbell, C. (2008). Low-carbon, attractive, resilient communities: New imperatives for sustainable redevelopment. In Conference Proceedings, 2008 Climate Change and Urban Design Council for European Urbanism Conference (pp. 42–58), September 14–16, 2008, Oslo, Norway. Conference Reader.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Kern, F. (2009). The transitions storyline in Dutch environmental policy. Environmental Politics, 18(1), 78–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart, R., Robinson, J., & Cohen, S. (2003). Climate change and sustainable development: Expanding the options. Climate Policy, 3(1), S19

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. & Heynen, N. (2003). Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, 35(5), 898-918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrie, R. D., Bryant, T., Beer, M., Anderson, B., Marshall, D., Kadowski, R., et al. (2013, March). An inventory of low-carbon energy for Canada. Vancouver and Ottawa: The Trottier Energy Futures Project. http://www.trottierenergyfutures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/An-Inventory-of-Low-Carbon-Energy-for-Canada.pdf

  • United Nations Commission on Environment and Development. (1992). Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Regional Information Centre. (2015, February 3). Figueres: First time the world economy is transformed intentionally. News release. Available online: http://www.unric.org/en/latest-un-buzz/29623-figueres-first-time-the-world-economy-is-transformed-intentionally

  • Vergragt, P. J., & Quist, J. (2011). Backcasting for sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(5), 747–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zolli, A. (2012, November 2). Learning to bounce back. New York Times. Opinion Pages. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/03/opinion/forget-sustainability-its-about-resilience.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urban Studies and Geography, Simon Fraser University, 2nd Floor, 515 W. Hastings St., Vancouver, V6B 5K3, Canada

    Meg Holden

  2. Munk School of Global Affairs and School of the Environment, University of Toronto, 315 Bloor St. W., Room 202, Toronto, M5S 3K7, Canada

    John Robinson

  3. Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning and Urban Forestry Program, Forest Sciences Centre 2045, 2424, University of British Columbia, Main Mall, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada

    Stephen Sheppard

Authors
  1. Meg Holden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephen Sheppard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meg Holden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

    Yoshiki Yamagata

  2. Preferred Networks, Inc.,, Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Hiroshi Maruyama

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holden, M., Robinson, J., Sheppard, S. (2016). From Resilience to Transformation Via a Regenerative Sustainability Development Path. In: Yamagata, Y., Maruyama, H. (eds) Urban Resilience. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation