Skip to main content

Putnam’s Paradox: Diversity, Destruction of Community, and Anti-Oedipal Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Correctness and the Destruction of Social Order
  • 1019 Accesses

Abstract

The distinguished political scientist Robert Putnam found that increased diversity was associated, except in the case of political activity, with the decline of social capital. I propose that it was not diversity, as such, that led to this decline, but the identity politics associated with it. This politics is discussed in terms of the anti-Oedipal dynamics of political correctness and the normalization of the pristine self. The development of social capital depends on common understandings and mutual assumptions, which are felt as antagonistic to the pristine self. This idea is elaborated through an analysis of the concept of microaggression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwartz, H.S. (2016). Putnam’s Paradox: Diversity, Destruction of Community, and Anti-Oedipal Psychology. In: Political Correctness and the Destruction of Social Order. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39805-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics