Skip to main content

Simple Atlas Selection Strategies for Liver Segmentation in CT Images

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technologies in Medicine (ITiB 2016)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 471))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper present two atlas selection strategies: segmentation with a fixed, single individual atlas and segmentation with the best atlas for liver CT images. These two strategies was implemented and results were compared using DICE similarity coefficient, mean surface and Hausdorff distance. The average mean surface distance for single individual atlas equals 3.49 and 3.08 mm for Sum of Squared Differences and Mutual Information respectively. Average Hausdorff distance for the similarity measures mentioned above, which measure outliers, equal to 6.02 and 4.65 mm. The average DICE similarity coefficient are 0.49 and 0.59. The better results were obtained for Mutual Information similarity measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rathore, S., Iftikhar M., Hussain M., Jalil A.: Texture analysis for liver segmentation and classification: a survey. In: Frontiers of Information Technology, pp. 121–126 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mharib, A., Ramli, A., Mashohor, S., Mahmood, R.: Survey on liver CT image segmentation methods. Artif. Intell. Rev. 37(2), 83–95 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Priyadarsini, S., Selvathi, D.: Survey on Segmentation of liver from CT images. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Punia, R., Singh, S.: Review on machine learning techniques for automatic segmentation of liver images. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 3(4), 666–670 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Okada, T., Shimada, R., Sato, Y., Hori, M., Yokota, K., Nakamoto, M., Chen, Y., Nakamura, H., Tamura, S.: Automated segmentation of the liver from 3D CT Images using probabilistic atlas and multi-level statistical shape model. Med. Image Comput. Comput.-Assist. Intervention 4791, 86–93 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Slagmolen, P., Elen, A., Seghers, D., Loeckx, D., Maes, F.: Haustermans K.: Atlas based liver segmentation using nonrigid registration with a B-spline transformation model. Proceedings of MICCAI Workshop on 3D Segmentation In The Clinic: A Grand Challenge, pp. 197–206 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Linguraru, M., Sandberg, J., Li, Z., Pura, J., Summers, R.: Atlas-based automated segmentation of spleen and liver using adaptive enhancement estimation. Med. Image Comput. Comput.-Assist. Intervention 5762, 1001–1008 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wyawahare, M., Patil, P., Abhyankar, H.: Image registration techniques: an overview. Int. J. Signal Process. Image Process. Pattern Recogn. 2(3), 11–28 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kalinić, H.: Atlas-based image segmentation: a survey. Department of Electronic Systems and Information Processing, Universiy of Zagreb, pp. 1–7 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rohlfing, T., Brandt, R., Menzel, R., Russakoff, D., Maurer, C.: Quo Vadis, Atlas-Based Segmentation? Handbook of Biomedical Image Analysis, pp. 435–486 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kikinis, R., Shenton, M., Iosifescu, D., McCarley, R., Saiviroonporn, P., Hokama, H., Robatino, A., Metcalf, D., Wible, C., Portas, C., Donnino, R., Jolesz, F.: A digital brain atlas for surgical planning, model-driven segmentation, and teaching. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 2(3), 232–241 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Staring, M., Klein, S., Pluim, J.: A rigidity penalty term for nonrigid registration. Med. Phys. 34(11), 4098–4108 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by National Science Center, Poland, Grant No. UMO-2012/05/B/ST7/02136.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Spinczyk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Âİ 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Spinczyk, D., KrasoĊ„, A. (2016). Simple Atlas Selection Strategies for Liver Segmentation in CT Images. In: Piętka, E., Badura, P., Kawa, J., Wieclawek, W. (eds) Information Technologies in Medicine. ITiB 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 471. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39796-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39796-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39795-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39796-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics