Abstract
The paper present two atlas selection strategies: segmentation with a fixed, single individual atlas and segmentation with the best atlas for liver CT images. These two strategies was implemented and results were compared using DICE similarity coefficient, mean surface and Hausdorff distance. The average mean surface distance for single individual atlas equals 3.49 and 3.08 mm for Sum of Squared Differences and Mutual Information respectively. Average Hausdorff distance for the similarity measures mentioned above, which measure outliers, equal to 6.02 and 4.65 mm. The average DICE similarity coefficient are 0.49 and 0.59. The better results were obtained for Mutual Information similarity measure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rathore, S., Iftikhar M., Hussain M., Jalil A.: Texture analysis for liver segmentation and classification: a survey. In: Frontiers of Information Technology, pp. 121â126 (2011)
Mharib, A., Ramli, A., Mashohor, S., Mahmood, R.: Survey on liver CT image segmentation methods. Artif. Intell. Rev. 37(2), 83â95 (2012)
Priyadarsini, S., Selvathi, D.: Survey on Segmentation of liver from CT images. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies (2012)
Punia, R., Singh, S.: Review on machine learning techniques for automatic segmentation of liver images. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 3(4), 666â670 (2013)
Okada, T., Shimada, R., Sato, Y., Hori, M., Yokota, K., Nakamoto, M., Chen, Y., Nakamura, H., Tamura, S.: Automated segmentation of the liver from 3D CT Images using probabilistic atlas and multi-level statistical shape model. Med. Image Comput. Comput.-Assist. Intervention 4791, 86â93 (2007)
Slagmolen, P., Elen, A., Seghers, D., Loeckx, D., Maes, F.: Haustermans K.: Atlas based liver segmentation using nonrigid registration with a B-spline transformation model. Proceedings of MICCAI Workshop on 3D Segmentation In The Clinic: A Grand Challenge, pp. 197â206 (2007)
Linguraru, M., Sandberg, J., Li, Z., Pura, J., Summers, R.: Atlas-based automated segmentation of spleen and liver using adaptive enhancement estimation. Med. Image Comput. Comput.-Assist. Intervention 5762, 1001â1008 (2009)
Wyawahare, M., Patil, P., Abhyankar, H.: Image registration techniques: an overview. Int. J. Signal Process. Image Process. Pattern Recogn. 2(3), 11â28 (2009)
KaliniÄ, H.: Atlas-based image segmentation: a survey. Department of Electronic Systems and Information Processing, Universiy of Zagreb, pp. 1â7 (2008)
Rohlfing, T., Brandt, R., Menzel, R., Russakoff, D., Maurer, C.: Quo Vadis, Atlas-Based Segmentation? Handbook of Biomedical Image Analysis, pp. 435â486 (2005)
Kikinis, R., Shenton, M., Iosifescu, D., McCarley, R., Saiviroonporn, P., Hokama, H., Robatino, A., Metcalf, D., Wible, C., Portas, C., Donnino, R., Jolesz, F.: A digital brain atlas for surgical planning, model-driven segmentation, and teaching. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 2(3), 232â241 (1996)
Staring, M., Klein, S., Pluim, J.: A rigidity penalty term for nonrigid registration. Med. Phys. 34(11), 4098â4108 (2007)
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by National Science Center, Poland, Grant No. UMO-2012/05/B/ST7/02136.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Âİ 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Spinczyk, D., KrasoĊ, A. (2016). Simple Atlas Selection Strategies for Liver Segmentation in CT Images. In: PiÄtka, E., Badura, P., Kawa, J., Wieclawek, W. (eds) Information Technologies in Medicine. ITiB 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 471. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39796-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39796-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39795-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39796-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)