Skip to main content

Managing Innovation in Multicultural Environments: An Imperative of Responsibility Within Interorganizational Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

The complexity of environmental, societal, economic challenges, etc. and businesses need to address with their innovation strategies and practices calls for new underlying concepts to support sustainable business behaviors within increasingly multicultural business and consumer environments. We address the issue of responsibility and coordinated decision making innovation in multicultural networks, and define critical steps for managing innovation within inter-organizational networks via creation of long-term stakeholder engagement on the international scale. The research is based on the case study of R&D intensive innovation development within multicultural interorganizational network in highly vulnerable sector of medical engineering for intensive healthcare units worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok V, Lemmens P (2015) The emerging concept of responsible innovation. Three reasons why it is questionable and calls for a radical transformation of the concept of innovation. Responsible Innov 2:19–35, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundiers K, Wiek A (2010) Educating students in real-world sustainability research: vision and implementation. Innov High Educ 36(2):107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che H, Narasimhan C, Padmanabhan V (2010) Leveraging uncertainty through backorder. Quant Mark Econ 8(3):365–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough HW (2003) The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 44(3):35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough HW, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (2006) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge D (1980) The social control of technology. St. Martin’s Press, New York, NY; Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1992) Formal scientific and technical institutions in the national system of innovation. In: Lundvall BA (ed) National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellström T (2003) Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technol Society 25(3):369–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janiunaite B, Kriaucioniene M, Jucevicius R (2004) New analytical framework of NIS based on integration of innovative performance and innovative culture indicators: the case of Lithuania. Innovation systems and development, emerging opportunities and challenges: the 2nd Globelics Conference, October 16–20, Beijing, China, pp 1–48, ISBN 7894945641

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale S (2007) Doing interviews. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall BÅ (1992) National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier Pleis L (2014) Overcoming uncertainty. Strateg Financ 96:21

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore G (1965) Moore’s law made real by Intel innovation. Intel, Santa Clara, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore G (1999) Crossing the chasm. Rev edn. HarperCollins, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (2005) Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ost F (1995) La Nature hors la loi. La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J (2012) Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science to society, with society. Sci Public Policy 39(6):751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen R, Stilgoe J, Macnaghten P, Gorman M, Fisher E, Guston D (2013) A framework for responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parayre R (2014) Uncertainty to your advantage. Convenience Store News 50:88–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavie X (2009) Une innovation responsible ? Constructif, November 2009, N 24. www.constructif.fr/bibliotheque/2009-11/une-innovation-responsable.html?item_id=2987

  • Pavie X (2012) The importance of responsible-innovation and the necessity of innovation-care. ESSEC working paper, No. 1203

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavie X, Carthy D (2015) Leveraging uncertainty: a practical approach to the integration of responsible innovation through design thinking. Procedia-Social Behav Sci 213:1040–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavie X, Egal J (2014) Innovation and responsibility: a managerial approach to the integration of responsibility in a disruptive innovation model. In: van den Hoven J et al (eds) Responsible innovation 1: innovative solutions for global issues. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 53–66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pavie X, Scholten V, Carthy D (2014) Responsible innovation: from concept to practice. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pavie X, Jouanny C, Carthy D, Verez F (2015) Le design thinking au service de l’innovation responsible. Maxima, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffaelle R, Robison W, Selinger E (2010) 5 Questions: sustainability ethics. Automatic/VIP Press, Portland, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim ARA, Baksh MSM (2003) Case study method for new product development in engineer-to-order organizations. Work Study 52(1):25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwells R (1994) Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. Int Mark Rev 11(1):7–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid A (2004) Conflict and cooperation. Institutional and behavior economics. Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J (1939) Business cycles: a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw Hill, New York, NY, p 105

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith K (1992) Environmental hazards: asserting risk and reducing disaster. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl BC (2013) Responsible research and innovation: the role of privacy in an emerging framework. Sci Public Policy 40(6):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42(9):1568–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe H (2011). A report on responsible research and innovation for the European Commission, MATTER, London. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2015

  • Taleb, N. N. (2001) [2007]. The Black Swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis W (1997) Application of a case study methodology. Qual Report 3(3):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vrande V, Lemmens C, Vanhaverbeke W (2006) Choosing governance modes for external technology sourcing. R&D Manage 36(3):347–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaverbeke W (2006) The interorganizational context of open innovation. In: Chesbrough, Vanhaverbeke, West (eds) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaverbeke W, Cloodt M, Van de Vrande V (2007) Connecting absorptive capacity and open innovation. Oslo Centre for Advanced Study, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Heintw M, Bessant J (eds) Responsible innovation. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward H (2005) Corporate responsibility and the business of law. Swedish Partnership for Global Responsibility. Available online http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G00195.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by a grant (No. GER-001/2015) from the Research Council of Lithuania. This research was performed in cooperation with the ESSEC Business School, Paris, France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Petraite .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petraite, M., Pavie, X., Ceicyte, J., Janiunaite, B., Carthy, D. (2017). Managing Innovation in Multicultural Environments: An Imperative of Responsibility Within Interorganizational Networks. In: Rozkwitalska, M., Sułkowski, Ł., Magala, S. (eds) Intercultural Interactions in the Multicultural Workplace. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39771-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics