Skip to main content

Causality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uncertainty
  • 3612 Accesses

Abstract

Cause is analogical. There is not one type, flavor, or aspect of cause, but four. A formal, material, efficient, and final or teleological. Most causation concerns events which occur not separately, as in this before that, but simultaneously, where simultaneous events can be spread through time. Many causal data are embedded in time, and there two types of time series which are often confused: per se and accidental. These should not be mistaken for non-causal data series (the most common) which are all accidental. All causes are activiations of potentials by something actual. A vase is potential a pile of shards. It is made actually a pile of shards by an actual baseball. All four aspects of the cause are there: form of shards, clay fragments, efficient bat, and the pile itself as an end. Deterministic (and probability) models are epistemological; essential causal models are ontological and express true understanding of the nature of a thing. Causes, if they exist and are present, must always be operative, a proposition that has deep consequences for probability modeling. Falsifiability is rarely of interest, and almost never happens in practice. And under-determination, i.e. the possibility of causes other than those under consideration, will always be with us.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bernardo, J.M., Rueda, R.: Bayesian hypothesis testing: a reference approach. Int. Stat. Rev. 70, 351–372 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Briggs, W.M.: On probability leakage. arxiv.org/abs/1201.3611 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Briggs, W.M.: The crisis of evidence: why probability & statistics cannot discover cause. arxiv.org/abs/1507.07244 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cartwright, N.: Aristotelian natures and the modern experimental method. In: Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science. University of California Press, Los Angeles (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castelvecchi, D.: Feuding physicists turn to philosophy for help. Nature 528, 446–447 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Drake, D.: Utility, sensitivity analysis, and cross-validation in Bayesian model-checking (comment to Gelman et al., 1996). Stat. Sin. 6 (4), 760–767 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Einstein, A., Podolsky, P., Rosen, N.: Underdeterminism: Craig and Ramsey. Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis, G., Silk, J.: Scientific method: defend the integrity of physics. Nature 516, 321–323 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feser, E.: Kripke, ross, and the immaterial aspects of thought. Am. Cathol. Philos. Q. 87, 1–32 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feser, E.: Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Editions Scholasticae, Neunkirchen-Seelscheid (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gelman, A.: Diagnostic checks for discrete data regression models using posterior predictive simulations. Appl. Stat. 49 (Part 2), 247–268 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jaynes, E.T.: Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kripke, S.: Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  14. List, C.: Craig’s theorem and the empirical underdetermination thesis reassessed. Disputatio 7, 28–39 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maddy, P.: Mathematical alchemy. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 37, 279–314 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Meng, X.L.: Posterior predictive p-values. Ann. Stat. 22 (3), 1142–1160 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Mooij, J.M., Peters, J., Janzing, D., Zscheischler, J., Scholkopf, B.: Distinguishing cause from effect using observational data: methods and benchmarks. arxiv.org/abs/1412.3773 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Quine, W.V.: Two dogmas of empiricism. Philos. Rev. 60, 20–43 (1951)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Quine, W.V.: Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Harper and Row, Harper Torchbooks, Evanston (1953)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Wallace, W.A.: The Modeling of Nature. CUA Press, Washington, DC (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Watson, L.: Nigel short: ‘Girls just don’t have the brains to play chess’. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/chess/11548840/Nigel-Short-Girls-just-dont-have-the- brains-to-play-chess.html (2015)

  23. Wikipedia: List of chess grandmasters. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chess_grandmasters (2015). Online; Accessed 22 April 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Briggs, W. (2016). Causality. In: Uncertainty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39756-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics