Skip to main content

Stealing Fire from the Gods (and the Weak)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

positively connoted concept of (human) nature, according to which nature is not that which needs to be overcome, but rather both that which enables us to go beyond those “natural” limitations and that for the sake of which we should go beyond them. We turn against nature as limitation, as we must precisely because it is our nature to do so. As Gregory Stock (2003, 2) once put it, stealing fire from the gods “is too characteristically human”. This chapter analyses the normative understanding of human nature that often underlies current demands for a biotechnological enhancement of the human. Hauskeller shows how the public denouncement of human nature as that which confines us is complemented by an embracement of nature as that which enables and indeed urges us to overcome all limits and boundaries and that for the sake of which we should overcome them. Indeterminacy itself becomes the primary goal and is at the same time regarded as the normative core of human nature. The inconsistencies of this view are shown through a discussion of Nietzsche’s philosophy of the overhuman, C.S. Lewis’s critique of the ideology of empowerment, and Zoltan Istvan’s novel The Transhumanist Wager.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ansell-Pearson, Keith (1992) “Who is the Ubermensch? Time, Truth, and Woman in Nietzsche”, Journal of the History of Ideas 53/2: 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banja, John (2011) “Virtue essentialism, prototypes, and the moral conservative opposition to enhancement: A neuroethical critique”, AJOB Neuroscience 2/2: 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, Nick (2005) “The Fable of the Dragon Tyrant,” Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 273–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2005a) “A History of Transhumanist Thought”, Journal of Evolution and Technology 14/1: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2005b) “Transhumanist Values”, Review of Contemporary Philosophy 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis (2002) Our Posthuman Future, New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2009) Transhumanism, Foreign Policy, http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/23/transhumanism/

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (2003) The Future of Human Nature, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, Alan (1969) The Immortalist, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, John (2007) Enhancing Evolution. The Ethical Case for Making Better People, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauskeller, Michael (2009) “Prometheus Unbound. Transhumanist Arguments from (Human) Nature”, Ethical Perspectives 16/1: 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2011a) “Forever Young? Life Extension and the Ageing Mind”, Ethical Perspectives 18/3: 385–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2011b) “Human Enhancement and the Giftedness of Life”, Philosophical Papers 40/1: 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istvan, Zoltan (2013) The Transhumanist Wager, Futurity Imagine Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, Karl (1971) Philosophy of Existence, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, Leon (2003) “Ageless bodies, happy souls”, New Atlantis 1/1: 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, Laurence (1987) Nietzsche’s Teaching. An Interpretation of Thus Spoke Zarathustra, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C.S. (1955) The Abolition of Man [1943], New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKibben, Bill (2003) Enough. Genetic engineering and the end of human nature, London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • More, Max (1996) “Transhumanism. Towards a Futurist Philosophy”, www.maxmore.com/transhum.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2009) “True Transhumanism”, Global Spiral, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2010) “The Overhuman in the Transhuman”, Journal of Evolution and Technology 21/1: 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich (1966) Werke in drei Bänden (W). Ed. Karl Schlechta, Munich: Hanser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pico della Mirandola (1985) On the Dignity of Man, On Being and the One, Heptaplus, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael (2007) The Case Against Perfection. Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, Julian (2001) “Procreative Beneficence: why we should select the best children”, Bioethics 15(5/6): 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, Julian, Bennett Foddy, and Megan Clayton (2004) “Why We Should Allow Performance Enhancing Drugs in Sport”, British Journal of Sports Medicine 38: 666–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Gary (1980) “The Rhetoric of Nietzsche’s Zarathustra”, Boundary 2/8: 165–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorgner, Stefan (2009) “Nietzsche, the Overhuman, and Transhumanism”, Journal of Evolution and Technology 20/1: 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, Gregory (2003) Redesigning Humans, London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, James Stacey (2009) Practical Autonomy and Bioethics, New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wudarczyk, Olga, Brian D. Earp, Adam Guastella, and Julian Savulescu (2013) “Could intranasal oxytocin be used to enhance relationships? Research imperatives, clinical policy, and ethical considerations”, Current Opinion in Psychiatry 26/5: 474–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zak, Paul J. (2012) The Moral Molecule. The new science of what makes us good or evil, London: Transworld Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hauskeller, M. (2016). Stealing Fire from the Gods (and the Weak). In: Mythologies of Transhumanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39741-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics