Skip to main content

Otto Neugebauer’s Vision for Rewriting the History of Ancient Mathematics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1008 Accesses

Part of the book series: Trends in the History of Science ((TRENDSHISTORYSCIENCE))

Abstract

Historians of mathematics have long exalted the achievements of the ancient Greeks as symbolized by a single name, Euclid of Alexandria. The thirteen books that comprise his Elements hold a place within Greek mathematics comparable to the Parthenon in its architectural tradition. Appreciation for Greek classicism was long reinforced by the formal ideal of Euclidean geometry, a style that persisted until well into the nineteenth century. Not until the early decades of the twentieth did a new picture of ancient mathematics emerge, advanced by the pioneering researches of Otto Neugebauer on Egyptian and especially Mesopotamian mathematics. Although grounded in detailed analysis of primary sources, Neugebauer ’s work was guided by a broad vision of the exact sciences in ancient cultures that predated the Greeks. He thereby broke with the traditional Greco-centric understanding of European science. Neugebauer ’s historical views and methodological approach, which elevated mathematical techniques while diminishing the importance of philosophical commentary, came under strong attack after he immigrated to the United States in 1939.

The common belief that we gain “historical perspective” with increasing distance seems to me utterly to misrepresent the actual situation. What we gain is merely confidence in generalizations which we would never dare make if we had access to the real wealth of contemporary evidence.

— Otto Neugebauer , The Exact Sciences in Antiquity (Neugebauer 1969, viii)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The sharpest attack against Neugebauer ’s methodological approach came from Sabetai Unguru in (Unguru 1975); for this text and reactions to it, see (Christianidis 2004). I discussed this within the larger context of the historiographical debates from that period in (Rowe 1996). See also the contribution by Schneider to the present volume “Contextualizing Unguru’s 1975 Attack on the Historiography of Ancient Greek Mathematics”.

  2. 2.

    It was later translated into English by Eva Brann (1929) (Klein 1968).

  3. 3.

    Ancient sources only hint at the circumstances surrounding this discovery, which probably took place during the latter half of the fifth century. Before this time, it was presumed that magnitudes of the same kind, for example two lengths, could always be measured by a third, hence commensurable. This is equivalent to saying that their ratio will be equal to the ratio of two natural numbers. This theory had to be discarded when it was realized that even simple magnitudes, like the diagonal and side of a square, have an irrational ratio because their lengths are incommensurable lengths. The discovery of such irrational objects in geometry had profound consequences for the practice of Greek geometry in the fourth century, see (Fowler 1999).

  4. 4.

    Die Antwort auf diese Frage, d. h. auf die Frage nach der geschichtlichen Ursache der Uraufgabe der gesamten geometrischen Algebra, kann man heute vollständig geben: sie liegt einerseits in der aus der Entdeckung irrationaler Größen folgenden Forderung der Griechen, der Mathematik ihre Allgemeingültigkeit zu sichern durch Übergang vom Bereich der rationalen Zahlen zum Bereich der allgemeinen Größenverhältnisse, andererseits in der daraus resultierenden Notwendigkeit, auch die Ergebnisse der vorgriechischen “algebraische” Algebra in eine “geometrische” Algebra zu übersetzen. Hat man das Problem einmal in dieser Weise formuliert, so ist alles Weitere vollständig trivial und liefert den glatten Anschluß der babylonischen Algebra an die Formulierungen bei Euklid.

  5. 5.

    Jeder Versuch, Griechisches an Vorgriechisches anzuschließen begegnet einem intensiven Widerstand. Die Möglichkeit, das gewohnte Bild der Griechen modifizieren zu müssen, ist immer wieder unerwünscht, trotz aller Wandlungen … stehen also die Griechen in der Mitte und nicht mehr am Anfang.

  6. 6.

    See, for example, the essays by Knorr in (Christianidis 2004).

  7. 7.

    See (Christianidis 2004) for a recent account of older as well as the newer historiography on Greek mathematics.

  8. 8.

    Neugebauer here alludes to the so-called “foundations crisis” that supposedly ensued with the discovery of incommensurable magnitudes. This interpretation became popular during the 1920s, but later fell out of favour (Christianidis 2004).

  9. 9.

    This refers to “The Unicorn in Captivity,” one of seven tapestries dating from ca. 1500 located in The Cloisters in New York. In the pagan tradition, the unicorn was a one-horned creature that could only be tamed by a virgin; whereas Christians made this into an allegory for Christ's relationship with the Virgin Mary.

References

  • Cherniss, H. (1935). Aristotle’s criticism of Presocratic philosophy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianidis, J. (Ed.). (2004). Classics in the history of Greek mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Santillana, G. & Pitts, Walter. (1951). Philolaos in Limbo, or: What Happened to the Pythagoreans? Isis, 42, 112–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, D. H. (1999). The mathematics of Plato’s academy. A new reconstruction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, E. (1923). Plato und die sogenannten Pythagoreer: Ein Kapitel aus der Geschichte des griechischen Geistes. Halle: Niemeyer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, T. L. (Ed.). (1956). The thirteen books of Euclid’s elements (Vol. 1). New York: Dover.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heidel, W. A. (1940). The Pythagoreans and Greek mathematics. American Journal of Philosophy, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. (1936). Die griechische Logistik und die Entstehung der Algebra. Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik, Astronomie und Physik, B: Studien, 3, 18–105 and 122–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. (1968). Greek mathematical thought and the origin of algebra. Trans. Eva Brann. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O. (1925). Litteraturanmeldelse (T. E. Peet, The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus). Matematisk Tidsskrift A, 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O. (1927). Zur Entstehung des Sexagesimalsystems. Abhandlungen der Akadamie der Wissenshaften zu Göttingen, 13, 1–55.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O. (1931). Zur vorgriechischen Mathematik. Erkenntnis, 2, 122–134.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O. (1932). Apollonius-Studien. Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik, Astronomie und Physik, B: Studien, 2, 215–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O. (1934). Vorlesungen über Geschichte der antiken mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 1. Vorgriechische Mathematik. Berlin: Verlag Julius Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O. (1936). Zur geometrischen Algebra (Studien zur Geschichte der Algebra III). Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik, Astronomie und Physik, B: Studien, 3, 245–259.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O. (1940). Review of (van der Waerden 1940). Mathematical Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O. (1941). Review of (van der Waerden 1941). Mathematical Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O. (1945). Review of (Steck 1945). Mathematical Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O. (1956). A Notice of Ingratitude. Isis, 47, 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O. (1963). Reminiscences on the Göttingen Mathematical Institute on the Occasion of R. Courant’s 75th Birthday. Otto Neugebauer Papers, Box 14, publications vol. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O. (1969). The exact sciences in Antiquity (2nd rev ed.). New York: Dover.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pyenson, L. (1995). Inventory as a Route to Understanding: Sarton, Neugebauer, and Sources. History of Science, 33, 253–282.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, C. (1976). Courant in Göttingen and New York: The Story of an Improbable Mathematician. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmert, V. & Schneider, Ute. (2010). Eine Disziplin und ihre Verleger. Disziplinenkultur und Publikationswesen der Mathematik in Deutschland (pp. 1871–1949). Bielefeld: Transkript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. E. (1986). ‘Jewish Mathematics’ at Gottingen in the Era of Felix Klein. Isis, 77, 422–449.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. E. (1996). New trends and old images in the history of mathematics. In R. Calinger (Ed.), Vita mathematica: historical research and integration with teaching (pp. 3–16). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. E. (2004). Making mathematics in an oral culture: Göttingen in the Era of Klein and Hilbert. Science in Context, 17, 85–129.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. E. (2012). Otto Neugebauer and Richard Courant: On exporting the Göttingen approach to the history of mathematics. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 34, 29–37.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarton, G. (1936a). The Study of the History of Science, with an Introductory Bibliography. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarton, G. (1936b). The study of the history of mathematics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarton, G. (1952). Review of Otto Neugebauer, The exact sciences in antiquity. Isis, 43, 69–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegmund-Schultze, R. (2009). Mathematicians Fleeing from Nazi Germany: Individual fates and global impact. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Steck, M. (Ed.). (1945). Proklus Diadochus, Kommentar zum ersten Buch von Euklids „Elementen“ (trans. by Leander Schönberger). Halle: s.n.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow, N. M. (1993). Otto E. Neugebauer (26 May 1899-19 February 1990). Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 137, 138–165.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Unguru, S. (1975). On the need to rewrite the history of Greek mathematics. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 15, 67–114.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van der Waerden, B. L. (1940). Zenon und die Grundlagenkrise der griechischen Mathematik. Mathematische Annalen, 117, 141–161.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van der Waerden, B. L. (1941). Die Astronomie der Pythagoreer und die Entstehung des geozentrischen Weltbildes. Himmelswelt, 51, 97–103 and 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeuthen, H. G. (1896). Geschichte der Mathematik im Altertum und Mittelalter. Kopenhagen: Verlag A. F. Hoest.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Rowe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rowe, D.E. (2016). Otto Neugebauer’s Vision for Rewriting the History of Ancient Mathematics. In: Remmert, V., Schneider, M., Kragh Sørensen, H. (eds) Historiography of Mathematics in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Trends in the History of Science. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39649-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics