Development Aid Decision Making Framework Based on Hybrid MCDM
Developmental Aid Programs or what is normally referred to as Official Development Assistance (ODA), plays a key role in the growth process of many underdeveloped and developing countries. However, with a recent growing scarcity of resources and a general call for strict accountability from aid-recipient countries, there has been some interests in the design of aid performance evaluation methodologies or tools. To deepen such interests, this paper proposes a hybrid Fuzzy AHP Synthetic Extent—PROMETHEE framework of how aid-recipient countries could be evaluated and selected in developmental aid programs. With the use of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) set of subjective criteria for evaluating aid programs, a decision framework pre-defined by linguistic terms of triangular fuzzy number format is provided for such selection decision problem. The framework serves to deepen transparency, fairness, value for money and sustainability of development aid programs.
KeywordsDevelopment aid Fuzzy AHP Fuzzy PROMETHEE Performance evaluation Poor countries
This work was supported by Grant Agency of the Czech Republic—GACR P103/15/06700S, further by financial support of research project NPU I no. MSMT-7778/2014 by the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic and also by the European Regional Development Fund under the Project CEBIA-Tech No. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0089. Further, this work was supported by Internal Grant Agency of Tomas Bata University under the project no. IGA/CebiaTech/2016/007.
- 1.Kharas, K.: Measuring Aid Effectiveness Effectively: A Quality of Official Development Assistance Index. Brookings Institution Press (2011). http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2011/07/26-aid-effectiveness-kharas. Accessed 10 Dec 2014
- 2.Morrison, K.M.: As the world bank turns: determinants of IDA lending in the cold war and after. Bus. Politics 13 (2011)Google Scholar
- 5.Dalgaard, C.J., Hansen, H.: Evaluating Aid Effectiveness in the Aggregate: A Critical Assessment of the Evidence. University Library of Munich, Germany (2010)Google Scholar
- 6.Palenberg, M.: Tools and Methods for Evaluating the Efficiency of Development Interventions. Evaluation Working Papers (2011)Google Scholar
- 9.Chang, D.Y.: Extent Analysis and Synthetic Decision, Optimization Techniques and Applications, vol. 1, pp. 352. World Scientific, Singapore (1992)Google Scholar
- 10.Saaty, T.L., Thomas L.: How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48(1), 9–26 (1990)Google Scholar
- 13.OECD: International Development Statistics. OECD Press (2014)Google Scholar