Skip to main content

Aortic Valve Valvuloplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Percutaneous Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women
  • 463 Accesses

Abstract

Today, the safety of percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is good with improved technical evolutions and operators’ experiences due to current diffusion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although, this technique offers good immediate hemodynamic efficacy at an acceptable risk of major complications, the medium prognosis remains poor in the absence of definitive therapy. However, in high-risk patients with temporary contraindications to TAVI, BAV can be used as a bridge with the hope that the patient will improve sufficiently to become suitable for intervention.

In this setting, the effect of gender may be relevant to understand timing and opportunity of percutaneous intervention. It has been demonstrated that elderly women with aortic stenosis (AS) have smaller body size and consequently smaller aortic annulus and reduced iliofemoral diameters compared to men, resulting in a higher risk of major complications after BAV. In the future, it seems mandatory to collect more prospective data to accurately evaluate risk and strategy for patients with severe AS according to sex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Osnabrugge RL, Mylotte D, Head SJ, et al. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1002–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cribier A, Savin T, Saoudi N, Rocha P, Berland J, Letac B. Percutaneous transluminal valvuloplasty of acquired aortic stenosis in elderly patients: an alternative to valve replacement? Lancet. 1986;1:63–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Safian RD, Berman AD, Diver DJ, et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in 170 consecutive patients. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:125–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lieberman EB, Bashore TM, Hermiller JB, et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in adults: failure of procedure to improve long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1522–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Dor I, Pichard AD, Satler LF, et al. Complications and outcome of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in high-risk or inoperable patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:1150–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eltchaninoff H, Durand E, Borz B, et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: acute and long-term outcomes. Am Heart J. 2014;167:235–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:S1–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Carlo M, Giannini C, Ettori F, et al. Impact of treatment choice on the outcome of patients proposed for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2010;6:568–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Saia F, Marrozzini C, Moretti C, et al. The role of percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty as a bridge for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2011;7:723–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carroll JD, Carroll EP, Feldman T, et al. Sex-associated differences in left ventricular function in aortic stenosis of the elderly. Circulation. 1992;86:1099–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bach DS, Radeva JI, Birnbaum HG, Fournier AA, Tuttle EG. Prevalence, referral patterns, testing, and surgery in aortic valve disease: leaving women and elderly patients behind? J Heart Valve Dis. 2007;16:362–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fuchs C, Mascherbauer J, Rosenhek R, et al. Gender differences in clinical presentation and surgical outcome of aortic stenosis. Heart. 2010;96:539–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Conrotto F, D’Ascenzo F, Presbitero P, et al. Effect of gender after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:809–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Puls M, Sobisiak B, Bleckmann A, et al. Impact of frailty on short- and long-term morbidity and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: risk assessment by Katz Index of activities of daily living. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:609–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Buja P, Napodano M, Tamburino C, et al. Comparison of variables in men versus women undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis (from Italian Multicenter CoreValve Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:88–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Watanabe Y, Hayashida K, Lefèvre T, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients of small body size. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84:272–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrante G, Pagnotta P, Petronio AS, et al. Sex differences in postprocedural aortic regurgitation and mid-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84(2):264–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayashida K, Lefèvre T, Chevalier B, et al. True percutaneous approach for transfemoral aortic valve implantation using the Prostar XL device: impact of learning curve on vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:207–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Otto CM, Mickel MC, Kennedy JW, et al. Three-year outcome after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Insights into prognosis of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1994;89:642–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Williams M, Kodali SK, Hahn RT, et al. Sex-related differences in outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: insights from the PARTNER trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1522–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kulik A, Burwash IG, Kapila V, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Long-term outcomes after valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 2006;114:I553–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Giannini MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giannini, C. (2017). Aortic Valve Valvuloplasty. In: Presbitero, P., Mehilli, J., Petronio, A. (eds) Percutaneous Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39611-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39611-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39609-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39611-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics