Abstract
As has often been said, the theories of secularization constituted a paradigm and reigning dogma of the sociology of the 1960s and 1970s (Tschannen 1991; Swatos and Christiano 1999). Many sociologists subscribed to Anthony Wallace’s statement, ‘The future of religion is extinction.’ Since the end of the Cold War and especially in the period after September 11, 2001, the roles have been reversed; now one might say that religion is here to stay while the future of secularization theory may be extinction, failure, or, at least, reformulation (Berger 1999; Stark 1999; Reeh 2009b). Religion has mounted the stage again and to a degree that would have been unfathomable, for instance, in the 1980s.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For an analysis of the rise of educational systems in Europe that includes competition but not the military struggle between states, see Ramirez and Boli 1987 2–17.
References
Assmann, J. (1997). Moses the Egyptian: The memory of Egypt in western monotheism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Beaman, L. G., Beyer, P., et al. (2008). Religion and diversity in Canada (Religion and the social order). Brill: Leiden.
Beckford, J. A. (2010). Religious pluralism and diversity: Response to Yang and Thériault. Social Compass, 57(2), 217–223.
Berger, P. L. (1969). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Doubleday.
Berger, P. L. (1999). The desecularization of the world: A global overview. In P. L. Berger (Ed.), The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Berger, P. L., Davie, G., et al. (2008). Religious America, secular Europe? A theme and variations. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Boserup, A. (1986). Staten, samfundet og krigen hos Clausewitz. In N. Berg (Ed.), Om krig. København: Rhodos.
Brown, C. G. (2001). The death of Christian Britain: Understanding secularisation, 1800–2000. London: Routledge.
Bruce, S. (2002). God is dead: Secularization in the West. Malden: Blackwell.
Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Casanova, J. (2007). Rethinking secularization: A global comparative perspective. In L. G. Beaman & P. Beyer (Eds.), Religion, globalization and culture. International studies in religion and society. Leiden: Brill.
Cubberley, E. P. (1920). Readings in the history of education a collection of sources and readings to illustrate the development of educational practice, theory, and organization. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Davie, G. (1994). Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without belonging. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dobbelaere, K. (2002). Secularization: An analysis at three levels. Bruxelles: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.
Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.
Elias, N. (1980). Über den Prozess der Zivilisation soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Finke, R. (1990). Religious deregulation: Origins and consequences. Journal of Church and State, 323, 609–637.
Finke, R., & Stark, R. (1992). The churching of America, 1776–1990: Winners and losers in our religious economy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Furet, F. O., & Ozouf, J. (1982). Reading and writing: Literacy in France from Calvin to Jules Ferry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giddens, A. (1985). The nation-state and violence, volume 2 of a contemporary critique of historical materialism. London: Polity.
Gorski, P. S., & Altinordu, A. (2008). After secularization? Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 55–85.
Halikiopoulou, D. (2011). Patterns of secularization: Church, state and nation in Greece and the Republic of Ireland. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.
Hervieu-Léger, D. (2000). Religion as a chain of memory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Højrup, T. (2002). Dannelsens dialektik etnologiske udfordringer til det glemte folk redaktion …: Marie Sandberg. København: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Højrup, T. (2003). State, culture, and life-modes the foundations of life-mode analysis. Burlington: Ashgate.
Jensen, T. (2005). European and Danish religious education: Human rights, the secular state, and rethinking religious education and plurality. Religion and Education, 321, 60–78.
Jensen, T. (2007). The study of religions and religion in Denmark. Nederlandsch theologisch tijdschrift, 614, 265–360.
Kaspersen, L. B. (2002). The “warfare-paradigm” in historical sociology: Warfare as a driving historical force. Distinktion, 32, 101–124.
Kaspersen, L. B. (2004). How Denmark became democratic: The impact of warfare and military reforms. Acta Sociologica, 471, 71–89.
Loserth, J. (1916). Die protestantischen Schulen der Steiermark im sechzehnten Jahrhundert. München: Akademie Verlag GmbH.
Luckmann, T. (1974). The invisible religion. New York: Macmillan.
Martin, D. (1978). A general theory of secularization. Oxford: Blackwell.
McLeod, H. (2000). Secularisation in Western Europe, 1848–1914. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
McLeod, H., Brown, C. G., et al. (2010). Secularisation in the christian world: Essays in honour of Hugh McLeod. Surrey: Ashgate.
Melton, J. V. H. (1988). Absolutism and the eighteenth-century origins of compulsory schooling in Prussia and Austria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nørr, E. (1979). Det højere skolevæsen og kirken. København: Akademisk Forlag.
Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987). The political construction of mass schooling: European origins and worldwide institutionalization. Sociology of Education, 601, 2–17.
Reeh, N. (2006). Religion and the state of Denmark – State religious politics in the elementary school system from 1721 to 1975, an alternative approach to secularization. Ph.d.-afhandling. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen
Reeh, N. (2009a). American civil religion as state-mythology. In A. Hvithamar, M. Warburg, & B. A. Jacobsen (Eds.), Holy nations and global identities: Civil religion, nationalism, and globalisation. Leiden: Brill.
Reeh, N. (2009b). Towards a new approach to secularization: Religion, education and the state in Denmark, 1721–1900. Social Compass, 56(2), 179–188.
Reeh, N. (2009c). Ideas and state subjectivity in history, the introduction of the equestrian schools in 1720 and the confirmation in 1736. Ideas in History, 3, 83–110.
Reeh, N. (2011). A shinning city on another hill: Danish civil religion as state mythology. Social Compass, 58(2), 235–246.
Reeh, N. (2013a). A relational approach to the study of religious survival units. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 25, 264–282.
Reeh, N. (2013b). Danish state policy on the teaching of religion from 1900 to 2007. Social Compass, 60(2), 236–250.
Reventlow, J. L. (1787). Ønsker, angaaende en General-Skole-Commission, og derefter en General-Skole-Directions Indretning. Copenhagen: Augustinus Faber.
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in: Strategies of current research. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stark, R. (1999). Secularization, R.I.P. The sociology of religon, 603, 249–273.
Strakosch-Grassmann, G. (1905). Geschichte des österreichischen Unterrichtswesens. Wien: Pichler.
Swatos, W. H., & Christiano, K. J. (1999). Introduction — Secularization theory: The course of a concept. Sociology of Religion, 603, 209–228.
Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, capital, and European states, A.D.990–1990.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Tschannen, O. (1991). The secularization paradigm: A systematization. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 304, 395–415.
Weber, M. (1965). Politics as a vocation. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
Wienecke, F. (1913). Die Begründung der evangelischen Volksschule in der Kurmark und ihre Entwicklung bis zum Tode König Friedrichs I. 1540–1713. http://goobiweb.bbf.dipf.de/viewer/resolver;jsessionid=8239DDDE5B2504D6AA70EF3B4FDBD2CA?urn=urn%3Anbn%3Ade%3A0111-bbf-spo-6457187 Accessed 2 Nov 2015.
Wilson, B. R. (1976). Aspects of secularization in the West. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 3, 259–276.
Acknowledgements
The chapters of this book have been written over a number of years and before the rise of the Islamic State and the tragic attack in Paris on November 13 2016. After these murders, this work sadly seems even more relevant, since one of the main issues that the book argues is that the academic studies of religion should pay more attention to the relations between religions as well as the relations between state and religion.
Since the book has been written over a number of years, earlier versions of some arguments have appeared in the following publications: Reeh 2006: Religion and the state of Denmark - state religious politics in the elementary school system from 1721 to 1975, an alternative approach to secularization. Unpublished Ph.D.-dissertation, University of Copenhagen; Reeh 2009a: “American civil religion as state-mythology” published in Holy nations and global identities: civil religion , nationalism, and globalisation , ed. A. Hvithamar, M. Warburg and B. A. Jacobsen. Published by Brill Academic Publishers; Reeh 2009b: “Towards a new approach to secularization: religion, education and the state in Denmark, 1721–1900” in Social Compass 56(2): 179–188 published by Sage; Reeh: 2009c. “Ideas and state subjectivity in history, the introduction of the equestrian schools in 1720 and the confirmation in 1736” in Ideas in History; Reeh 2011:“A shinning city on another hill: Danish civil religion as state mythology” in Social Compass 58(2): 235–246 published by Sage; Reeh 2013a:“A relational approach to the study of religious survival units” in Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 25 published by Koninklijke Brill NV and Reeh 2013b: “Danish State policy on the teaching of religion from 1900 to 2007” published in Social Compass 60(2): 236–250. I am grateful for the permission to expand on these earlier versions of my work.
Over the years, my work has been funded by the Danish Council for Independent Research and the Carlsberg Foundation. I am very grateful for this support. With regards to the content, this book has benefitted from comments, assistance and advice from many individual persons. The point of departure for the study at hand was a Ph.D. thesis at the Department of History of Religions at the University of Copenhagen. I would like to thank Margit Warburg who most importantly was my Ph.D. supervisor and to whom I am greatly indebted. I am grateful to Thomas Højrup for providing me with a radical different theoretical outlook without which this book could not have been written and who has been a stimulating critic as well as a friend, throughout the years. The same goes for James Beckford who was a member of the assessment committee at my Ph.D. defence and who since have remained a friend and provided me with invaluable advice and recommendations. I would like to thank Danielle Allen, Joan Scott and Didier Fassin who gave me the amazing opportunity of spending a full year at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. Furthermore, I am greatly indebted to Catharina Raudvere who invited me to partake in her Carlsberg funded research project Many Roads in Modernity, which provided an opportunity to continue my work and to be part of a stimulating research group in which we had many fruitful and inspiring discussions. I would also like to express my gratitude towards the editors of the book, namely Lene Kühle, Lori Beaman and Anna Halahoff for their encouragements, patience and constructive editorial advice. Various pieces of the book have been presented in different settings over the years and a number of individuals who in different ways have given me advice, comments or simply been good colleagues. In particular, I would like to thank Peter J. Katzenstein, Peter Beyer, Christian Meyer, Jesper Eckhardt Larsen, Ingrid Markussen, Erik Reenberg Sand, Annika Hvithamar, Jørgen Podemann Sørensen, Tove Tybjerg, Peter Westergaard, Morten Warmind, Laura Feldt, Lars Kjær Bruun, Morten Thomsen Højsgaard, Mikael Rothstein, Mogens Pelt, Abdullah Simsek, Trine Stauning Willert, Zlatko Jovanovic, Kristian Frisk, Mads Damgaard, Andreas Baumann and Erik Sporon Fiedler. Finally, I would like to thank my wife Tine Reeh for her support and encouragement throughout the years.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reeh, N. (2016). Introduction. In: Secularization Revisited - Teaching of Religion and the State of Denmark. Boundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39608-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39608-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39606-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39608-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)