Skip to main content

Are Pedagogical Agents’ External Regulation Effective in Fostering Learning with Intelligent Tutoring Systems?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 9684))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this study we tested whether external regulation provided by artificial pedagogical agents (PAs) was effective in facilitating learners’ self-regulated learning (SRL) and can therefore foster complex learning with a hypermedia-based intelligent tutoring system. One hundred twenty (N = 120) college students learned about the human circulatory system with MetaTutor during a 2-hour session under one of two conditions: adaptive scaffolding (AS) or a control (C) condition. The AS condition received timely prompts from four PAs to deploy various cognitive and metacognitive SRL processes, and received immediate directive feedback concerning the deployment of the processes. By contrast, the C condition learned without assistance from the PAs. Results indicated that those in the AS condition gained significantly more knowledge about the science topic than those in the C condition. In addition, log-file data provided evidence of the effectiveness of the PAs’ scaffolding and feedback in facilitating learners’ (in the AS condition) metacognitive monitoring and regulation during learning. We discuss implications for the design of external regulation by PAs necessary to accurately detect, track, model, and foster learners’ SRL by providing more accurate and intelligent prompting, scaffolding, and feedback regarding SRL processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Bonferroni correction was used to adjust p values since several statistical tests were performed simultaneously on the data set.

References

  1. Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.): International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer, Amsterdam (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Winne, P.H., Azevedo, R.: Metacognition. In: Sawyer, K. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd edn, pp. 63–87. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.: Confusion and its dynamics during device comprehension with breakdown scenarios. Acta Psychol. 151, 106–116 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kinnebrew, J., Segedy, J., Biswas, G.: Integrating model-driven and data-driven techniques for analyzing learning behaviors in open-ended learning environments. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies (in press). doi:10.1109/TLT.2015.2513387

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sabourin, J., Lester, J.: Affect and engagement in game-based learning environments. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 5, 45–56 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taub, M., Azevedo, R., Bouchet, F., Khosravifar, B.: Can the use of cognitive and metacognitive self-regulated learning strategies be predicted by learners’ levels of prior knowledge in hypermedia-learning environments? Comput. Hum. Behav. 39, 356–367 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Azevedo, R.: Issues in dealing with sequential and temporal characteristics of self- and socially-regulated learning. Metacognition Learn. 9, 217–228 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Azevedo, R.: Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educ. Psychol. 50, 84–94 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Azevedo, R., Taub, M., Mudrick, N.V., Martin, S.A., Grafsgaard, J.F.: Understanding and reasoning about real-time cognitive, affective, metacognitive processes to foster self-regulation with advanced learning technologies. In: Schunk, D., Greene, J.A. (eds.) Handbook of Self-regulation and Performance, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Calvo, R., D’Mello, S.K. (eds.): New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Technologies. Springer, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duffy, M., Azevedo, R.: Motivation matters: interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Comput. Hum. Behav. 52, 338–348 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harley, J.M., Bouchet, F., Hussain, S., Azevedo, R., Calvo, R.: A multi-componential analysis of emotions during complex learning with an intelligent multi-agent system. Comput. Hum. Behav. 48, 615–625 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Azevedo, R., Harley, J., Trevors, G., Duffy, M., Feyzi-Behnagh, R., Bouchet, F., Landis, R.: Using trace data to examine the complex roles of cognitive, metacognitive, and emotional self-regulatory processes during learning with multi-agent systems. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, pp. 427–449. Springer, Amsterdam (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Azevedo, R., Johnson, A., Chauncey, A., Graesser, A.: Use of hypermedia to convey and assess self-regulated learning. In: Zimmerman, B.J., Schunk, D.H. (eds.) Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance, pp. 102–121. Routledge, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hadwin, A.F., Järvelä, S., Miller, M.: Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially-shared regulation of learning. In: Zimmerman, B.J., Schunk, D.H. (eds.) Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance, pp. 65–84. Routledge, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. VanLehn, K.: The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educ. Psychol. 46, 197–221 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (DRL 1431552).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Azevedo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Azevedo, R., Martin, S.A., Taub, M., Mudrick, N.V., Millar, G.C., Grafsgaard, J.F. (2016). Are Pedagogical Agents’ External Regulation Effective in Fostering Learning with Intelligent Tutoring Systems?. In: Micarelli, A., Stamper, J., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39582-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39583-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics