Skip to main content

Formalizing Organization Implementation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Enterprise Engineering X (EEWC 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 252))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Our research program aims at finding building blocks that are able to deal quickly with the constant change that organizations face. In order to do so, a deeper understanding of possible organization implementation variants is necessary, as well as the implications on the operation and IT support of organizations. In earlier research, we have composed a list of Organization Implementation Variables to informedly decide upon organization implementation, enabling traceability in governing enterprise and IT transformations. This list has been validated and extended by four practical case studies and has been formalized afterwards and validated by prototyping. In this paper the resulting framework is presented which (a) is broader and more detailed than before, (b) has a sound theoretical basis, and (c) contains precise and validated definitions of the variables itself. This paper shows that the framework is not only suitable for organization modeling, but also has possibilities for designing software in which implementation choices can be made explicit and variable. This paper also provides insights in the implications of implementation choices on the operation of an organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that it might be confusing that implementation itself is a category within the broader meaning of implementation. For the rest of this section, implementation is meant in the narrow definition.

  2. 2.

    The term ‘population’ is used instead of ‘instantation’ as instantiation may imply that one instance is enough, where population implies multiple instances should be used for validation.

References

  1. Oosterhout, M.P.A.: Business agility and information technology in service organizations. Ph.D. thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  2. Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., Sambamurthy, V.: Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15, 120–131 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dietz, J.L.G., Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Enterprise ontology and enterprise architecture - how to let them evolve into effective complementary notions. GEAO J. Enterp. Architect. 2007, 1 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krouwel, M.: Towards designing modular structures for reducing non-linear effects of organizational change: research proposal. http://www.ciaonetwork.org/uploads/eewc2013/presentations/doctoral_consortium/1_krouwel.ppt. Accessed 3 April 2016

  5. Lind, M., Goldkuhl, G.: Designing business process variants – using the BAT framework as a pragmatic lens. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 408–420. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Capturing variability in business process models: the provop approach. J. Softw. Maintenance Evol. Res. Pract. 22(6–7), 519–546 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Regev, G., Soffer, P., Schmidt, R.: Taxonomy of flexibility in business processes. In: Regev, G., Soffer, P., Schmidt, R. (eds.) BPMDS, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 236 (2006). CEUR-WS.org

  8. Schonenberg, H., Mans, R., Russell, N., Mulyar, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Towards a taxonomy of process flexibility. In: Bellahsne, Z., Woo, C., Hunt, E., Franch, X., Coletta, R. (eds.) CAiSE Forum, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 344, pp. 81–84 (2008). www.CEUR-WS.org

  9. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J.: Normalized Systems: Re-creating Information Technology Based on Laws for Software Evolvability. Koppa, Kermt, Belgium (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Terlouw, L.: Modularization and specification of service-oriented systems. Ph.D. thesis, TU Delft (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Kervel, S.: Ontology driven enterprise information systems engineering. Ph.D. thesis, TU Delft (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Jong, J.: A method for enterprise ontology based design of for enterprise information systems. Ph.D. thesis, TU Delft (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Op ’t Land, M., Krouwel, M.: Exploring organizational implementation fundamentals. In: Proper, H.A., Aveiro, D., Gaaloul, K. (eds.) EEWC 2013. LNBIP, vol. 146, pp. 28–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Op ’t Land, M., Proper, H.A.: Impact of principles on enterprise engineering. In: Österle, H., Schelp, J., Winter, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1965–1976 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology - Theory and methodology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Mulder, J.B.F.: Rapid enterprise design. Ph.D. thesis, TU Delft (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Op ’t Land, M., Zwitzer, H., Ensink, P., Lebel, Q.: Towards a fast enterprise ontology based method for post merger integration. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing (SAC-ACM2009), pp. 245–252. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krouwel, M.R., Op ’t Land, M.: Using enterprise ontology as a basis for requirements for cross-organizationally usable applications. In: Figueiredo, A.D., Ramos, I., Trauth, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7\(^{th}\) Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems 2012 (MCIS2012), MCIS Proceedings, University of Minho, Portugal, AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Paper 23(2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Molly, S.: Exploring organizational implementation fundamentals in a real enterprise. Master’s thesis, Antwerp Management School (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Bockhooven, S., Op ’t Land, M.: Organization implementation fundamentals: a case study validation in the youthcare sector. In: Complementary Proceedings of the Workshops TEE, CoBI, and XOC-BPM at IEEE-COBI 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. de Laat, L., Op ’t Land, M., Krouwel, M.: Supporting goal-oriented organizational implementation - combining DEMO and process simulation in a practice-tested method. In: Aveiro, D.G.D. (ed.) EEWC 2016. LNBIP, vol. 252, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Krouwel, M.R., Huysmans, P.: Observing organization implementation variables in practice: a case study on dutch municipal subsidy agents. Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weinberg, G.M.: An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise engineering - the manifesto. http://www.ciaonetwork.org/publications/EEManifesto.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2016

  25. Dietz, J.L.: The FI theory - understanding information and factual knowledge. Technical report, Czech Technical University in Prague, Delft University of Technology version 2.3 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dietz, J.L.: The MU theory - understanding models and modelling. Technical report, Czech Technical University in Prague, Delft University of Technology, Antwerp Management School version 1.2 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hevner, A.R.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19(2), 87–92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Heidelberg (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Hayes, J.: The Theory and Practice of Change Management, 4th edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Schein, E.H.: Organization Culture and Leadership, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chen, P.P.: The Entity Relationship Approach to Logical Database Design. Q.E.D. Information Sciences, Wellesley (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Halpin, T.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases, 1st edn. Academic Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dietz, J.L.G., Hoogervorst, J.A.: EE theories Overview. Technical report, Czech Technical University in Prague (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tribolet, J.: An engineering approach to natural enterprise dynamics: From top-down purposeful systemic steering to bottom-up adaptive guidance control. In: 2014 International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (ENASE), p. 1, April 2014

    Google Scholar 

  38. Object Management Group: Business Motivation Model (BMM) Specification, V1.1. OMG Available Specification OMG Document Number: formal/2010-05-01, Object Management Group http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/1.1/PDF/. Accessed 3 April 2016

  39. Dietz, J.L., Halpin, T.: Using DEMO and ORM in concert - a case study. In: Siau, K. (ed.) Advanced topics in database research, vol. 3, pp. 218–236. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Halpin, T.: Object-role modeling version 2. In: Liu, L., Özsu, M.T. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Database Systems, pp. 1941–1946. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Offerman, T.: Improving IT Supported organizational change; formalizing organizational implementation fundamentals. Master’s thesis, Universiteit Leiden (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mike, J.M., Keller, P.J.: Business Process Mapping: Improving Customer Satisfaction. Wiley, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Open Group: Archimate 2.1 Specification. Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ettema, R., Dietz, J.L.G.: ArchiMate and DEMO – mates to date? In: Albani, A., Barjis, J., Dietz, J.L.G. (eds.) CIAO! 2009. LNBIP, vol. 34, pp. 172–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Dietz, J.L.: The DELTA theory - understanding systems ontology. Technical report, Czech Technical University in Prague, Delft University of Technology, Antwerp Management School version 3.0 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gouveia, D., Aveiro, D.: Two Protocols for DEMO Engines: PSI or Tell&Agree. CIAO DC 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marien R. Krouwel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krouwel, M.R., Op ’t Land, M., Offerman, T. (2016). Formalizing Organization Implementation. In: Aveiro, D., Pergl, R., Gouveia, D. (eds) Advances in Enterprise Engineering X. EEWC 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 252. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39567-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39567-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39566-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39567-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics