Advertisement

The Role of Folliculo-Luteal Function in the Outcome of Pregnancy

  • György Siklósi
Chapter
  • 211 Downloads

Abstract

Recently an increasing amount of evidence has shown that pregnancy outcome is already decided in the early phase of pregnancy and that inadequate placentation “ischaemic placental disease” underlies the various forms of adverse pregnancy outcome, the cause of which is still unclear. The characteristics of the secretory endometrium (thickness, blood supply, etc.) and thus the conditions for placentation are essentially determined by the preovulatory oestradiol (E2) and the following progesterone (P) and E2 level. Based on this, we assumed that the outcome of pregnancy is inherently determined by the quantitative relations of the folliculo-luteal function (FLF).

To test this assumption, we investigated the relationship between FLF and pregnancy outcome in 884 pregnancies conceived under treatment for unexplained infertility. We described FLF with the average value of luteal P and E2. The average luteal P and E2 was significantly (p < 0.001) different in pregnancies ending with miscarriage, preterm birth and mature birth and also in pregnancies resulting in newborns with retardation and in eutrophic newborns. We found a strong and significant correlation (r = 0.80–0.84, p < 0.001) between the luteal P and E2 values and the length of pregnancy (weeks). A strong correlation was also detected between the luteal P and E2 values and the length, weight, weight percentile and biparietal diameter of newborns (r = 0.73–0.84; p < 0.001).

Based on the outcome of pregnancy, three grades of folliculo-luteal insufficiency (FLI) can be differentiated:
  • Physiological FLF:
    • Average P > 23 ng/ml and E2 350–800 pg/ml: singular, mature and eutrophic birth

  • FLI grade I:
    • Average P 17–23 ng/ml and E2 220–350 pg/ml: preterm birth, IUGR, preeclampsia

  • FLI grade II:
    • Average P 11–17 ng/ml and E2 100–220 pg/ml: miscarriage during the first and second trimesters

  • FLI grade III:
    • Average P < 11 ng/ml and E2 < 100 pg/ml: infertility

We are able to determine FLF prior to conception – by treatment controlled with the luteal P and E2 value – which makes it possible to prevent the various forms of adverse pregnancy outcome.

Keywords

Preterm Birth Pregnancy Outcome Embryo Transfer Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Recurrent Miscarriage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Ischemic placental disease: epidemiology and risk factors. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159:77–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. ASRM 2008 – Progesterone supplementation during the luteal phase and in early pregnancy in the treatment of infertility: an educational bulletin. American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee Fertil Steril 2008:90:789–92.Google Scholar
  3. ASRM 2012 – The clinical relevance of luteal phase deficiency: a committee opinion. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1112–7.Google Scholar
  4. Asvold BO, Vatten LJ, Tanbo TG, Eskild A. Concentrations of human chorionic gonadotrophin in very early pregnancy and subsequent pre-eclampsia: a cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1153–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Balasch J, Gratacós E. Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29(4):263–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bamfo JE, Odibo AO. Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction. J Pregnancy. 2011;2011:640–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Rinaudo PF, Zhou L, Hummel AC, Guo W. Symptomatic patients with an early viable intrauterine pregnancy: HCG curves redefined. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:50–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnhart KT, Fay CA, Suescum M, Sammel MD, Appleby D, Shaunik A, Dean AJ. Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of ultrasonography in symptomatic first-trimester pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;11:299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Behrman RE, Butler AS, editors. Preterm birth: causes, consequences, and prevention. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on understanding premature birth and assuring healthy outcomes. Washington (DC). National Academies Press (US); 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Berkő P, Joubert K. IUGR and its obstetrical management (Az intrauterin növekedési retardáció és annak szülészeti ellátása.). [Article in Hungarian]. Magyar Nőorvosok Lapja, 2015:78(2):18–28.Google Scholar
  11. Branch DW, Gibson M, Silver RM. Recurrent miscarriage. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1740–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bukowski R, Smith GC, Malone FD, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Hankins GD, Berkowitz RL, Gross SJ, Dugoff L, Craigo SD, Timor-Tritsch IE, Carr SR, Wolfe HM, D’Alton ME, FASTER Research Consortium. Fetal growth in early pregnancy and risk of delivering low birth weight infant: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2007;334(7598):836.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Casper RF. It’s time to pay attention to the endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(3):519–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Casper RF, Mitwally MF. Use of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;54(4):685–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chung K, Sammel M, Zhou L, Hummel A, Guo W, Barnhart K. Defining the curve when initial levels of human chorionic gonadotropin in patients with spontaneous abortions are low. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):508–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis OK, Berkeley AS, Naus GJ, Cholst IN, Freedman KS. The incidence of luteal phase defect in normal, fertile women, determined by serial endometrial biopsies. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:582–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. ESHRE 2000a - Crosignani PG, Rubin BL. Optimal use of infertility diagnostic tests and treatments. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:723–32.Google Scholar
  18. ESHRE 2000b. – The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. (No authors listed). Hum Reprod. 2000;15(8):1856–64.Google Scholar
  19. ESHRE 2005 – Capri Workshop Group. Baird DT, Collins J, Egozcue J, Evers LH, Gianaroli L, Leridon H, Sunde A, Templeton A, Van Steirteghem A, Cohen J, Crosignani PG, Devroey P, Diedrich K, Fauser BC, Fraser L, Glasier A, Liebaers I, Mautone G, Penney G, Tarlatzis B. Fertility and ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:261–76.Google Scholar
  20. Filicori M, Butler JP, Crowley Jr WF. Neuroendocrine regulation of the corpus luteum in the human. Evidence for pulsatile progesterone secretion. J Clin Invest. 1984;73:1638–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hafner E, Metzenbauer M, Höfinger D, Munkel M, Gassner R, Schuchter K, Dillinger-Paller B, Philipp K. Placental growth from the first to the second trimester of pregnancy in SGA-foetuses and pre-eclamptic pregnancies compared to normal foetuses. Placenta. 2003;24:336–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Halász M, Szekeres-Barthó J. The role of progesterone in implantation and trophoblast invasion. J Reprod Immunol. 2013;97:43–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Iams JD. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1861.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones GS. Luteal phase defect: a review of pathophysiology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1991;3:641–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Joubert K. Standards of birth weight and length based on liveborn data in Hungary, 1990–1996. J Hungarian Gynecol. 2000;63:155–63 (In Hungarian with English summary).Google Scholar
  26. Kathiresan AS, Cruz-Almeida Y, Barrionuevo MJ, Maxson WS, Hoffman DI, Weitzman VN, Christie DR, Manko GF, Ory SJ. Prognostic value of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin is dependent on day of embryo transfer during in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:1362–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. McLean M, Smith R. Corticotropin-releasing hormone in human pregnancy and parturition. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 1999;10(5):174–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mihm M, Gangooly S, Muttukrishna S. The normal menstrual cycle in women. Anim Reprod Sci. 2011;124(3-4):229–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mook-Kanamori DO, Steegers EA, Eilers PH, Raat H, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW. Risk factors and outcomes associated with first-trimester fetal growth restriction. JAMA. 2010;303(6):527–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Muglia LJ, Katz M. The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(6):529–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Paradisi R, Barzanti R, Natali F, Battaglia C, Venturoli S. Metroplasty in a large population of women with septate uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(4):449–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Parker SE, Werler MM. Epidemiology of ischemic placental disease: a focus on preterm gestations. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38(3):133–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Paulson RJ. Hormonal induction of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(3):530–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Platt MJ. Outcomes in preterm infants. Public Health. 2014;128(5):399–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Radwanska E, Smith P, Hammond J. Correlation between preovulatory serum estradiol and midluteal progesterone levels during induction of ovulation with Clomid and HCG. J Reprod Med. 1980;24:79–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Raghupathy R, Al-Mutawa E, Al-Azemi M, Makhseed M, Azizieh F, Szekeres-Bartho J. Progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) modulates cytokine production by lymphocytes from women with recurrent miscarriage or preterm delivery. J Reprod Immunol. 2009;80:91–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sadek S, Bell SC. The effects of the antihormones RU486 and tamoxifen on fetoplacental development and placental bed vascularisation in the rat: a model for intrauterine fetal growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103(7):630–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Seeber BE. What serial hCG can tell you, and cannot tell you, about an early pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2012;9:1074–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharkey AM, Smith SK. The endometrium as a cause of implantation failure. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;17(2):289–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Siklósi G, Siklós P, Hintalan A, Olajos F, Marcsek Z. Episodic secretion of hormones and the diagnostic value of single blood estimates. II. progesterone, oestradiol and oestrone. Acta Med Hung. 1984;41:203–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Siklósi G, Bánhidy F, Ács N. Fundamental role of folliculo-luteal function in recurrent miscarriage. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(5):299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith GC, Smith MF, McNay MB, Fleming JE. First-trimester growth and the risk of low birth weight. N Engl J Med. 1998,339(25):1817–22.Google Scholar
  43. Smith GC. First trimester origins of fetal growth impairment. Semin Perinatol. 2004;28:41–50.Google Scholar
  44. Sonntag B, Loebbecke KC, Nofer JR, Kiesel L, Greb RR. Serum estradiol and progesterone in the mid-luteal phase predict clinical pregnancy outcome in IVF/ICSI cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29(7):700–3.Google Scholar
  45. Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010;376:631–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Strigini FA, Lencioni G, De Luca G, Lombardo M, Bianchi F, Genazzani AR. Uterine artery velocimetry and spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(3):374–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Török M, Mészáros J, Métneki J, Dobos A, Hajdú K, Doszpod J, Gáti I. Az iker és singuláris magzatok méhen belüli növekedésének sajátosságai. Magy Nőorv L. 1988;51:278–80.Google Scholar
  48. Urbancsek J, Hauzman E, Fedorcsák P, Halmos A, Dévényi N, Papp Z. Serum human chorionic gonadotropin measurements may predict pregnancy outcome and multiple gestation after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:540–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. van den Elzen HJ, Cohen-Overbeek TE, Grobbee DE, Quartero RW, Wladimiroff JW. Early uterine artery Doppler velocimetry and the outcome of pregnancy in women aged 35 years and older. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;5(5):328–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Yaron Y, Heifetz S, Ochshorn Y, Lehavi O, Orr-Urtreger A. Decreased first trimester PAPP-A is a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome. Prenat Diagn. 2002a;22(9):778–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Yaron Y, Ochshorn Y, Heifetz S, Lehavi O, Sapir Y, Orr-Urtreger A. First trimester maternal serum free human chorionic gonadotropin as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2002b;17(6):352–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Young SL. Oestrogen and progesterone action on endometrium: a translational approach to understanding endometrial receptivity. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27(5):497–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • György Siklósi
    • 1
  1. 1.Semmelweis University Second Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations