Skip to main content

Stiffness of Prosthetic Repairs for Historic Timber Beams

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Historical Earthquake-Resistant Timber Framing in the Mediterranean Area

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 1))

  • 893 Accesses

Abstract

Glued connections are often used as reinforcements or repairs of decayed parts in historic timber frames. Those timber frames are most of the time statically indeterminate structures, meaning that the ratios of stiffness between different members and joints of the structure are related to distribution of stresses within the structure. Hence, a poor repair, i.e. a too stiff or at the contrary a too flexible intervention may change dangerously the distribution of stresses within the structure, induce cracks and damage the whole structure. However, there are still no guidelines on how to evaluate the stiffness of glued connections and therefore, on how to predict the impact of these interventions on the force distribution in the timber frame. This paper focuses on glued-in rods, and uses finite element models to predict and compare the stiffness of glued-in rods in different configurations of repairing connections. This study shows sensitively different axial stiffness between those configurations: they may indeed vary in the ratio of one to two for the same strength. This highlights the importance of predicting the stiffness of glued-in rod connections to be able to make recommendations for the configuration which best respects the original structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Descamps T, Lambion J, Laplume D (2006) Timber structure: rotational stiffness of carpentry joints. In: 9th world conference on timber engineering, Portland, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Descamps T, Leoskool L, Van Parys L et al (2014) Influence of the joint stiffness in old timber hyperstatic frames. In: World conference on timber engineering, Quebec, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  3. Branco J, Descamps T (2015) Analysis and strengthening of carpentry joints. In: Construction and building materials

    Google Scholar 

  4. Descamps T, Avez C, Carpentrier O et al (2015) Historic timber roofs modelling: prosthesis and resin repairs. In: SHATIS-3rd international conference on structural health assessment of timber structures, Wroclaw, Poland

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moore D (1998) Rotafix resiwood systems: estimating for timber resin repairs

    Google Scholar 

  6. Steiger R, Serrano E, Stepinac M et al (2015) Strengthening of timber structures with glued-in rods. In: Construction and building materials

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tlustochowicz G, Serrano E, Steiger R (2011) State-of-the-art review on timber connections with glued-in steel rods. In: Materials and structures, vol 44, pp 997–1020

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stepinac M (2012) State-of-the-Art review on timber connections with glued-in steel rods. In: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction—Meeting forty six, Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  9. Serrano E (2001) Glued-in rods for timber structures—A 3D model and finite element parameter studies. Int J Adhes Adhes 21:115–127

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johanssen C-J, Bengtsson C (2002) GIROD-glued-in rods for timber structures: final report. SMT4-CT97-2199

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rossignon A, Espion B (2008) Experimental assessment of the pull-out strength of single rods bonded in glulam parallel to the grain. In: Holz Roh Werkst 66, pp 419–432

    Google Scholar 

  12. Steiger R, Gehri E, Widmann R (2009) Pull-out strength of axially loaded steel rods bonded in glulam parallel to the grain. In: Materials and structures, vol 40, pp 69–78

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feligioni L, Lavisci P, De Ciechi M et al (2003) Influence of glue rheology and joint thickness on the strength of bonded-in rods. In: Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff, vol 61, pp 281–287

    Google Scholar 

  14. Natterer J, Sandoz JL, Rey M (2004) Traité de Génie Civil de l’Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne- vol 13-Construction en bois: Matériau, Technologie et Dimensionnement, Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et universitaires romandes, pp 243–248

    Google Scholar 

  15. Avez C, Descamps T, Van Parys L (2015) Development of a cohesive surface-based model predicting glued-in FRP rods behaviour. In: AB2015-3rd international conference on structural adhesive bonding, Porto, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  16. Avez C, Descamps T, Van Parys L (2015) Development of a cohesive crack model for glued timber connections. In: Matinée des Chercheurs UMons (MDC2015), Mons, Belgique

    Google Scholar 

  17. German National Application Document DIN V EN 1995-1-1/NA 1:2044-12

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gonzales E, Tannert T, Avez C (2015) Timber joints with multiple glued-in steel rods. In: AB2015-3rd international conference on structural adhesive bonding, Porto, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pliogrip structural adhesives, Technical Datasheet, Document 2432 V2 F2, 2012, Ashland Inc

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cognard P (2006) Collage du bois-Colles. Adhésifs. Liants-bm7636 in «Techniques de l’ingénieur»

    Google Scholar 

  21. European standard-EN 338-Timber grades

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tannert T, Faghani P, Zhu H et al (2014) Timber joints with glued-in FRP rods. In: World conference on timber engineering, Quebec, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  23. Datoussaïd S (2014) Calcul des Structures et problèmes non linéaires. Université de Mons, Mons

    Google Scholar 

  24. Serrano E (2004) A numerical study of the shear-strength-predicting capabilities of test specimens for wood-adhesive bonds. Int J Adhes Adhes 24:23–25

    Google Scholar 

  25. Campilho R, Banea MD, Da Silva LFM (2013) Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer. Int J Adhes Adhes 48–56

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cognard P (2002) Collage des matériaux-Mécanismes. Classification des colles.bm7615 in «Techniques de l’Ingénieur»

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Coralie Avez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Avez, C., Descamps, T. (2016). Stiffness of Prosthetic Repairs for Historic Timber Beams. In: Cruz, H., Saporiti Machado, J., Campos Costa, A., Xavier Candeias, P., Ruggieri, N., Manuel Catarino, J. (eds) Historical Earthquake-Resistant Timber Framing in the Mediterranean Area. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39492-3_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39492-3_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39491-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39492-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics