Skip to main content

What Factors Drive Hedging Among Mauritian Firms?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 346 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter fills a vital gap when it comes to assessing the drivers behind hedging in Mauritius. It is widely acknowledged by both practitioners and academicians that knowledge about derivatives’ use constitutes a major hurdle in their use. Prior empirical evidence on hedging is chiefly focused on developed countries with little being understood about the situation in developing countries. Using data for the period 2005–06, findings clearly show that managers’ incentives to hedge, the tax convexity motive to hedge along with financial and operational explanations underlying hedging, are not applicable to the Mauritian context. Important drivers for hedging are found to be a composition of the size and age of firms, buttressing the notion that high fixed costs and knowledge about derivatives act as the main propelling forces for a derivatives framework. These findings suggest that larger firms are the ones most susceptible to use derivatives. Consequently, smaller firms, though subject to currency risk, are less susceptible to endorse sound risk management programmes. The government is therefore advised to establish a derivatives house whereby smaller firms can have the possibility to hedge as per their size so that currency risk impacts are well contained in the economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rights issues do not constitute a common practice on the Stock Exchange of Mauritius.

  2. 2.

    This could also lead to lower risk, it all depends on the movements in the two currencies vis-à-vis the rupee.

  3. 3.

    Such a depreciating rupee is highly appreciated among exporters as it their revenue receipts denominated in rupees.

  4. 4.

    The solution is to analyse whether they report their asset and liabilities in foreign currencies to make them eligible for the analysis.

  5. 5.

    But this holds only for a small number of companies.

  6. 6.

    Technically speaking, the sample should be biased towards importers based on the depreciating rupee; because many exporters are also importers, however, they were incorporated into the analysis.

  7. 7.

    Both hedgers and speculators account for the main actors in the derivatives market.

Bibliography

  • Aabo, T. (2006). The importance of foreign debt as an alternative to currency derivatives in actual management of exchange rate exposure. European Financial Management, 12(4), 663–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam, T. R. (2002). Risk management and the credit risk premium. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 243–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allayannis, G., & Ofek, E. (2001). Exchange rate exposure, hedging, and the use of foreign currency derivatives. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 273–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allayannis, G., & Weston, J. P. (2001). The use of foreign currency derivatives and firm market value. The Review of Financial Studies, 14, 243–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allayannis, G., Lel, U., & Miller, D. (2004). Corporate governance and the hedging premium around the world. Working paper, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amihud, Y. (1993). Evidence on exchange rates and equity shares, exchange rates and corporate performance. Irwin: Business One.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartram, S., Brown, G., & Fehle, F. (2004). International evidence on financial derivatives usage. Working paper, Lancaster University, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and University of South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, H., Bradhury, M., & Magan, S. (1997). An international comparison of derivatives use. Financial Management, 26(4), 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borokhovich, K., Brunarski, K., Crutchley, C., & Simkins, B. (2004). Board composition and corporate use of interest rate derivatives. The Journal of Financial Research, 27(2), 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breeden, D., & Viswanathan, S. (1996). Why do firms hedge? An asymmetric information model. Working paper, Duke University, Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breeden, D. T., & Viswanathan, S. (1998). Why do firms hedge? An asymmetric information model. The Journal of Fixed Income, 25(3), 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., Crabb, P., & Haushalter, D. (2003). Are firms successful at selective hedging? Working paper, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Northwest Nazarene University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E., & Judge, A. P. (2007). The determinants of foreign currency: Does foreign currency debt induce a bias. European Financial Management, 14(3), 445–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, A., Ligterink, J., & Macrae, V. (2002). A firm-specific analysis of the exchange rate exposure of Dutch firms. ERIM Report Series Research Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarzo, P., & Duffie, D. (1995). Corporate incentives for hedging and hedge accounting. Review of Financial Studies, 95, 743–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, G., & Garand, M. (2003). Risk management determinants affecting firm’s values in the gold mining industry: New empirical results. Econometric Letters, 79, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolde, W. (1995). Hedging, leverage, and primitive risk. Journal of Financial Engineering, 4, 187–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., & Peterson, B. C. (1988). Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 141–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, E., Jr., & Lessard, D. R. (1986). On the measurement of operating exposure to exchange rates: A conceptual approach. Financial Management, 15, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froot, K., Scharfstein, D., & Stein, J. (1993). Risk management: Coordinating investment and financing policies. Journal of Finance, 48, 425–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, D., & Nam, J. (1998). The underinvestment problem and corporate derivatives use. Financial Management, 27(4), 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geczy, C., Minton, B. A., & Schrand, C. (1997). Why firms use currency derivatives. Journal of Finance, 52, 1323–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R., & Rogers, D. A. (2002). Do firms hedge in response to tax incentives? The Journal of Finance, LVII(2), 815–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankins, K. W. (2007). How do firms manage risk? The interaction of financial and operational hedging. SSRN working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haushalter, G. D. (2000). Financing policy, basis risk, and corporate hedging: Evidence from oil and gas producers. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 107–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (1990). The exchange rate exposure of U.S. multinationals. Journal of Business, 63, 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, N. L., & Hewins, R. D. (1997). The motives for corporate hedging among UK multinationals. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 2, 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do Investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., Mathur, I., & Nam, J. (2006). Is operational hedging a substitute for or a complement to financial hedging? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 834–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lel, U. (2004). Currency risk management, corporate governance, and financial market development. Working paper, University of Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lel, U. (2006). Currency hedging and corporate governance: A cross-country analysis (International Finance discussion paper 858). Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. D. (1994). Exchange rates and the valuation of firms. In Y. Amihud & R. Levich (Eds.), Exchange rates and the valuation of equity shares. New York: Irwin Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., & Wang, H. C. (2001). Firm risk management policies: Financial hedging and corporate diversification. Academy of Management Proceeding, 20(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Chen-Miao., & Smith, S. (2003). Hedging, financing and investment decision: A theory and empirical test. Woking paper, Georgia State University and Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, R. (2001). The effects of industry structure on economic exposure. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S. L. (1996). Evidence on corporate hedging policy. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 419–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporate finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 32, 261–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nance, D. R., Smith, C. W., & Smithson, C. (1993). On the determinants of corporate hedging. The Journal of Finance, XLVIII(1), 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H., & Faff, R. (2003). Can the use of foreign currency derivatives explain variations in foreign exchange exposure?: Evidence from Australian companies. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 13(3), 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. A., & Thiagarajan, S. R. (1997). Risk measurement and hedging, Working paper, North-Western University, Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramlall, I. (2009). Determinants of hedging: An empirical investigation for Mauritius. The ICFAI University Journal of Financial Risk Management, 6(3/4), 99–120. ISSN 0972-916X, ZDB-ID 24871539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, T. (1994). Gold Hedge Survey. Burns Fry Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. W., & Stulz, R. M. (1985). The determinants of firms’ hedging policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20(4), 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufano, P. (1996). Who manages risk? An empirical examination of risk management practices in the Gold Mining Industry. The Journal of Finance, LI(4), 1097–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whidbee, D. A., & Wohar, M. (1999). Derivative activities and managerial incentives in the banking industry. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5, 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zingales, L. (1995). What determines the value of corporate votes? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 1047–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramlall, I. (2017). What Factors Drive Hedging Among Mauritian Firms?. In: Economics and Finance in Mauritius. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39435-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39435-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39434-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39435-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics