A Posthumous Note on the Lombard Rate in Mauritius

  • Indranarain Ramlall


The current study sheds light on the Lombard Rate which had been used as the main stance for monetary policy in Mauritius prior to the introduction of the Key Repo Rate. Results show that yields on Treasury Bills were cointegrated with movements in the Lombard Rate. In the long run, yields for different maturities adjusted more or less by the same amount. Most importantly, a 1% change in the Lombard Rate triggered approximately a 0.37% change in the respective Treasury Bills yields, showing that local market players did not fully adjust their bidding yields patterns. The most plausible explanation relates to an excessively strong level of aggressiveness in the Mauritian Treasury Bill market. Based on the ingrained Mauritian culture of depositing money mainly in banks, banks are thereby usually awash in cash which compel them to invest aggressively in the Treasury Bill market to ensure comfortable returns. Policy-wise, this implies that full monetary policy transmission mechanism onto the Treasury Bill market will always be incomplete on the back of conventional depositors, which ironically sounds like a good omen to the government in terms of undermined cost for public debt.


Interest Rate Monetary Policy Unit Root Test Term Structure Banking Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bank of Mauritius. (2006). A new framework for the conduct of monetary policy by the Bank of Mauritius. Communiqué, 13 December.
  2. Campbell, J. Y., & Shiller, R. J. (1987). Cointegration and tests of present value models. The Journal of Political Economy, 95, 1062–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarida, R. H., Sarno, L., Taylor, M. P., & Valente, G. (2006). The role of asymmetries and regime shifts in the term structure of interest rates. Journal of Business, 79, 1193–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clements, M. P., & Galvao, A. B. (2003). Testing the expectations theory of the term structure of interest rates in threshold models. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 7, 567–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engsted, T., & Tanggaard, C. (1994). A cointegration analysis of Danish zero-coupon bond yields. Applied Financial Economics, 4, 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerlach, S., & Smets, F. (1997). The term structure of Euro-rates: Some evidence in support of the expectations hypothesis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 16, 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall, S. G., Anderson, H. M., & Granger, C. W. J. (1992). A cointegration analysis of treasury bill yields. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74, 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration-with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koukouritakis, M., & Michelis, L. (2008). The term structure of interest rates in the 12 newest EU countries. Applied Economics,Taylor & Francis Journals. 40 (4), 479–490.Google Scholar
  10. Mili, M., Sahut, J. M., & Teulon, F. (2012). New evidence of the expectation hypothesis of interest rates: A flexible nonlinear approach. Applied Financial Economics, 22, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Musti, S., & D’Ecclesia, R. L. (2008). Term structure of interest rates and the expectations hypothesis: The eurozone. European Journal of Operational Research, 185, 1596–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ramlall, I. (2014). Is there a pecking order in the demand for financial services/product in Mauritius? Journal of African Business, 15(1), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Indranarain Ramlall
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MauritiusMokaMauritius

Personalised recommendations