Skip to main content

Application of Business Process Diagrams’ Complexity Management Technique Based on Highlights

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (BPMDS 2016, EMMSAD 2016)

Abstract

The purpose of business process diagrams is mainly to make the communication between process-related stakeholders more effective. Currently, BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) is the leader and de-facto standard for business process modeling. However, the notation and their corresponding diagrams have been perceived as complex by many different researchers. Much work was already done in order to manage such complexity by changing or extending the existing BPMN notation. In this paper, we will propose a solution that aims to decrease the complexity of business process diagrams without changing the notation or existing approaches by introducing opacity-driven graphical highlights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moody, D.: The ‘physics’ of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(6), 756–779 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: Complexity metrics for business process models. In: 9th International Conference on Business Information Systems, BIS 2006, pp. 1–12 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cardoso, J.: Approaches to compute workflow complexity. Business 06291, 16–21 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Decker, G., Puhlmann, F.: Extending BPMN for modeling complex choreographies. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 24–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernández, H.F., Palacios-González, E., García-Díaz, V., Pelayo G-Bustelo, B.C., Sanjuán Martínez, O., Cueva Lovelle, J.M.: SBPMN — an easier business process modeling notation for business users. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 32(1–2), 18–28 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Muehlen, Mz, Recker, J.: How much language is enough? Theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 465–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kocbek, M., Jost, G., Hericko, M., Polancic, G.: Business process model and notation: the current state of affairs. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 12(2), 509–539 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Object Management Group (OMG): Business process model and notation (BPMN) version 2.0. Business, vol. 50, p. 170 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Terry, M., Mynatt, E.D.: Enhancing general-purpose tools with multi-state previewing capabilities. Knowl.-Based Syst. 18(8), 415–425 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cardoso, J.: How to measure the control-flow complexity of web process and workflows. In: Workflow Handbook, vol. 2005, pp. 199–212 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Edmonds, B.: What is Complexity - The philosophy of complexity per se with application to some examples in evolution, p. 13. Manchester Metropolitan University (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Latva-Koivisto, A.M.: Finding a complexity measure for business process models. Complexity, pp. 1–26 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L.: Graph matching algorithms for business process model similarity search. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Cardoso, J.: What makes process Smodels understandable? In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. La Rosa, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Wohed, P., Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Managing process model complexity via concrete syntax modifications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 7(2), 255–265 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Erol, S.: Coloring support for process diagrams: a review of color theory and a prototypical implementation. Vienna University of Economics and Business (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Rolón, E., Ruiz, F., García, F., Piattini, M.: Applying Software metrics to evaluate business process models. CLEI Electron. J. 9, 15 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregor Jošt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jošt, G., Polančič, G. (2016). Application of Business Process Diagrams’ Complexity Management Technique Based on Highlights. In: Schmidt, R., Guédria, W., Bider, I., Guerreiro, S. (eds) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2016 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 248. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39429-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics